Project Management Simulation-Based Learning For Systems Engineering Students

Traditional training based on static models and case studies is the backbone of most teaching and training programs in the area of systems engineering. However, in order to teach and learn project management for systems engineering students, a new methodology based on dynamic models and real-time simulation is introduced. A project management course for students in systems engineering included learning how to use the Project Management Trainer (PMT) that simulates a dynamic, stochastic project management environment. The students used the simulator both in single-user mode (simple project management) and in multi-user multi-project mode. A class of 66 students performed repetitive simulation-runs (in single-user mode) with a break period of several weeks between the runs and repetitive simulation-runs in multi-user mode. The students used different history recording mechanisms. For the single-user mode, manual or automatic history recording mechanisms were used by the experimental group, while the control group did not use any history recording mechanism. The findings indicate that for the initial learning phase, the manual mechanism is better than the automatic mechanism. However, for the relearning phase, the break period length influenced the performance after the break. A comparison between the experimental group and the control group for both single-user mode and multi-user mode revealed that using any history recording mechanism reduced forgetting. Based on the findings, some practical implications of using simulators to improve the learning-forgetting process are discussed.

[1]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[3]  Geert Vissers,et al.  A Simple Classification Model for Debriefing Simulation Games , 2004 .

[4]  Maurice Bonney,et al.  Production breaks and the learning curve: The forgetting phenomenon , 1996 .

[5]  S. Sikström,et al.  The power integration diffusion model for production breaks. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[6]  Mohamad Y. Jaber,et al.  A numerical comparison of three potential learning and forgetting models , 2004 .

[7]  David A. Kolb,et al.  Developing teams using the Kolb Team Learning Experience , 2005 .

[8]  Charles F. Petranek.  Written Debriefing: The Next Vital Step in Learning with Simulations , 2000 .

[9]  Ezey M. Dar-Ei,et al.  Human learning : from learning curves to learning organizations , 2000 .

[10]  W A Wickelgren,et al.  Alcoholic intoxication and memory storage dynamics , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Avi Parush,et al.  Simulation‐based Learning in Engineering Education: Performance and Transfer in Learning Project Management , 2006 .

[12]  Mohamad Y. Jaber,et al.  Countering forgetting through training and deployment , 2003 .

[13]  Shlomo Globerson,et al.  Incorporating Forgetting into Learning Curves , 1987 .

[14]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members , 2000 .

[15]  Paul V. Martorana,et al.  What Do Groups Learn from Their Worldliest Members? Direct and Indirect Influence in Dynamic Teams , 2000 .

[16]  B Hesketh,et al.  Learning from errors in a driving simulation: effects on driving skill and self-confidence , 2000, Ergonomics.

[17]  V. Ruohomäki.  Viewpoints on learning and education with simulation games , 1994 .

[18]  Mustafa Uzumeri,et al.  Experiential learning and forgetting for manual and cognitive tasks , 2000 .

[19]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  Learning and forgetting industrial skills: An experimental model , 1993 .