What Shapes the Temperatures of Living Rooms in Three European Regions

The paper presents results of a study of heating habits (particularly the reported temperature in the living room during the heating season) in three EU regions: Aberdeenshire in Scotland, Brandenburg state in Germany, and South Bohemia in the Czech Republic. Data were collected using a questionnaire study carried out in 2010. There were approximately 500 respondents in each region. Three types of data are analysed: socio-demographics (including gender, age, education, income); housing characteristics (e.g. type, size, insulation, heating system), and attitudes towards energy and environmental issues (perception of climate change and perceived self-efficacy of energy saving). The results show some explanatory power of income, house insulation, age, place of living and self-efficacy on people’s reported living room temperatures. The biggest differences were found, however, between the three regions. Scottish households report the lowest average temperature, Germans higher and Czechs the highest. We also discuss the role of the local climatic conditions and put the results (especially the negligible role of most socio-demographics and housing characteristics) into the framework of theory of social practice and discussions about the limits of traditional sociopsychological ABC models (attitude-behaviour-choice) of pro-environmental behaviours.

[1]  D.R.G. Hunt,et al.  A national field survey of house temperatures , 1982 .

[2]  U. Norlén,et al.  Domestic indoor temperatures in Sweden , 1984 .

[3]  D. Cicchetti.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[4]  Ingo Schmoranz,et al.  Der Energieverbrauch der privaten Haushalte , 1994 .

[5]  E. Shove.  Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[6]  A. Warde.  Consumption and Theories of Practice , 2005 .

[7]  R. Gifford,et al.  Free-Market Ideology and Environmental Degradation , 2006 .

[8]  Sami Karjalainen,et al.  Thermal comfort and use of thermostats in Finnish homes and offices , 2009 .

[9]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  C. Vlek,et al.  Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda , 2009 .

[11]  W. Abrahamse,et al.  How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relate to households' direct and indirect energy use and savings? , 2009 .

[12]  E. Shove.  Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[13]  Neil Allan,et al.  Low-energy dwellings: the contribution of behaviours to actual performance , 2010 .

[14]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Residential heat comfort practices: understanding users , 2010 .

[15]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Emerging strategies of urban reproduction : the UK low carbon transition plan , 2010 .

[16]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change , 2011 .

[17]  Rosie Day,et al.  'Only old ladies would do that': age stigma and older people's strategies for dealing with winter cold. , 2011, Health & place.

[18]  Michelle Shipworth,et al.  Thermostat settings in English houses: No evidence of change between 1984 and 2007 , 2011 .

[19]  Kirsten Gram-Hanssen,et al.  Understanding change and continuity in residential energy consumption , 2011 .

[20]  J. Urban,et al.  Exploring domestic energy-saving: The role of environmental concern and background variables , 2012 .

[21]  B. Megyesi,et al.  Climate Change? No, Wise Resource Use is the Issue: Social Representations of Energy, Climate Change and the Future , 2012 .

[22]  Andrea D Finney,et al.  Coping with low incomes and cold homes , 2012 .

[23]  A. Summerfield,et al.  Heating patterns in English homes: Comparing results from a national survey against common model assumptions , 2013 .

[24]  Michael I. Gentry,et al.  Predicting the diversity of internal temperatures from the English residential sector using panel methods , 2013 .

[25]  Environmentally Significant Behaviour in the Czech Republic: Energy, Food and Transportation , 2013 .

[26]  Kathryn B. Janda,et al.  From “if only” to “social potential” in schemes to reduce building energy use , 2014 .

[27]  Harold Wilhite,et al.  Rethinking embodied knowledge and household consumption , 2014 .

[28]  Gordon Walker,et al.  What Is Energy For? Social Practice and Energy Demand , 2014 .

[29]  Tanja Winther,et al.  Electricity consumption: should there be a limit? Implications of people’s attitudes for the forming of sustainable energy policies , 2014 .

[30]  Gordon Walker,et al.  The dynamics of energy demand: Change, rhythm and synchronicity , 2014 .

[31]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The North East Scotland Energy Monitoring Project: Exploring relationships between household occupants and energy usage , 2014, Energy and Buildings.

[32]  Stefan Bouzarovski,et al.  Energy poverty in the European Union: landscapes of vulnerability , 2014 .

[33]  Karen Bickerstaff,et al.  Thermal comfort practices in the home and their impact on energy consumption , 2014 .