Numerical experiments on oil sands shear dilation and permeability enhancement in a multiphase thermoporoelastoplasticity framework

Abstract Oil sands exhibit substantial shear dilation during thermal oil recovery processes. Shear dilation is the result of increasing effective horizontal stresses induced by inhomogeneous thermal expansion; shear dilation is irreversible and in quartzose sands leads to porosity, permeability and compressibility increases. Hence, shear dilation has been considered a major and positive geomechanics factor in thermal enhanced oil recovery. In this paper we extend a fully-coupled thermal reservoir model in the multiphase thermoporoelastic framework to a multiphase thermoporoelastoplastic framework, in order to account for shear dilation. In a series of numerical experiments we explore how the stiffness and Poisson's ratio of overburden rocks and the initial stress state in the reservoir affect the reservoir stress path, thus directing changes in the magnitude of shear dilation, porosity change and permeability enhancement. Numerical results indicate that a stiffer overburden rock leads to a smaller magnitude of shear dilation and permeability enhancement; a smaller Poisson's ratio of the overburden rock has only a slightly positive contribution; a larger initial lateral stress ratio corresponds to a larger magnitude of shear dilation and permeability enhancement; and a larger dilation angle of oil sands leads to a larger magnitude of shear dilation and permeability enhancement.

[1]  M. Dusseault Coupled Processes and Petroleum Geomechanics , 2004 .

[2]  Karsten Pruess,et al.  Integral solutions for transient fluid flow through a porous medium with pressure-dependent permeability , 2000 .

[3]  Maurice B. Dusseault,et al.  24. Geomechanics Effects in Thermal Processes for Heavy-Oil Exploitation , 2010 .

[4]  Shunde Yin,et al.  Multiphase poroelastic modeling in semi-space for deformable reservoirs , 2009 .

[5]  M. Dusseault,et al.  Seismic monitoring and geomechanics simulation , 2007 .

[6]  I. Fatt,et al.  Reduction in Permeability With Overburden Pressure , 1952 .

[7]  P. Li,et al.  When is it important to consider geomechanics in SAGD operations? Author's reply , 2004 .

[8]  Olivier Coussy,et al.  Mechanics of porous continua , 1995 .

[9]  Henry J. Ramey,et al.  Absolute Permeability as a Function of Confining Pressure, Pore Pressure, and Temperature , 1987 .

[10]  Craig J. Hickey,et al.  Mechanics of porous media , 1994 .

[11]  Richard Wan,et al.  Couplled Geomechanical-thermal Simulation For Deforming Heavy-oil Reservoirs , 1994 .

[12]  Rajagopal Raghavan,et al.  Fully Coupled Geomechanics and Fluid-Flow Analysis of Wells With Stress-Dependent Permeability , 2000 .

[13]  B. Schrefler,et al.  The Finite Element Method in the Static and Dynamic Deformation and Consolidation of Porous Media , 1998 .

[14]  Shunde Yin,et al.  Thermal reservoir modeling in petroleum geomechanics , 2009 .

[15]  A. Settari,et al.  Coupling Of Fluid Flow And Soil Behaviour To Model Injection Into Uncemented Oil Sands , 1989 .

[16]  A. Settari,et al.  Geotechnical aspects of recovery processes in oil sands , 1993 .

[17]  M. Dusseault,et al.  Shear strength of Athabasca Oil Sands , 1978 .

[18]  M. Dusseault Stress Changes in Thermal Operations , 1993 .

[19]  P. Collins Geomechanical Effects on the SAGD Process , 2007 .

[20]  Maurice B. Dusseault,et al.  Description of fluid flow around a wellbore with stress-dependent porosity and permeability , 2003 .

[21]  W. S. Tortike,et al.  A Framework for Multiphase Nonisothermal Fluid Flow in a Deforming Heavy Oil Reservoir , 1987 .

[22]  Michael S. Bruno,et al.  Casing Shear: Causes, Cases, Cures , 2001 .

[23]  Jonny Rutqvist,et al.  Stress-dependent permeability of fractured rock masses: A numerical study , 2004 .

[24]  M. Dusseault Petroleum Geomechanics: Excursions Into Coupled Behaviour , 1999 .

[25]  M. Dusseault Coupling Geomechanics and Transport in Petroleum Engineering , 2008 .