Temporal organization of bi-directional traffic in the ant Lasius niger (L.)

SUMMARY Foraging in ants is generally organized along well-defined trails supporting a bi-directional flow of outbound and nestbound individuals and one can hypothesize that this flow is maximized to ensure a high rate of food return to the nest. In this paper we examine the effect of bottlenecks on the temporal organization of ant flow. In our experiments ants had to cross a bridge to go from their nest to a food source. Two types of bridges were used: one with and one without bottlenecks. Traffic counts show that, in spite of the bottlenecks and the reduction of path width, the volume of traffic and the rate of food return were the same on both bridges. This was due to a change in the temporal organization of the flow: when path width decreases alternating clusters of inbound and outbound ants were observed crossing the bridge. This organization limits the number of head-on encounters and thus allows to maintain the same travel duration as on the wide bridge. A model is proposed to assess in various conditions the importance of the behavioural rules observed at the individual level for the regulation of traffic flow. It highlights how the interplay between the value of the flow and cooperative behaviours governs the formation and size of the clusters observed on the bridge.

[1]  John G. Robinson On the Move. How and Why Animals Travel in Groups , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  I. Couzin,et al.  Self-Organization and Collective Behavior in Vertebrates , 2003 .

[3]  Alexander John,et al.  Collective effects in traffic on bi-directional ant trails. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  P. Ball Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another , 2004 .

[5]  Philippe Rasse,et al.  Etude sur la régulation de la taille et sur la structuration du nid souterrain de la fourmi Lasius niger , 1999 .

[6]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the antLasius niger (L.) , 1992, Insectes Sociaux.

[7]  Audrey Dussutour,et al.  Organisation spatio-temporelle des déplacements collectifs chez les fourmis , 2004 .

[8]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Self-Organizing Pedestrian Movement , 2001 .

[9]  F. Roces,et al.  Information about food quality influences load-size selection in recruited leaf-cutting ants , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  I. Couzin,et al.  Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  M. Burd,et al.  Head-on encounter rates and walking speed of foragers in leaf-cutting ant traffic , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[12]  J. Hutchinson Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[13]  W. Gotwald,et al.  Army Ants: The Biology of Social Predation , 1995 .

[14]  Tadao Matsumoto,et al.  Open-Air Litter Foraging in the Nasute Termite Longipeditermes longipes (Isoptera: Termitidae) , 1998, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[15]  Lubos Buzna,et al.  Self-Organized Pedestrian Crowd Dynamics: Experiments, Simulations, and Design Solutions , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[16]  K. Linsenmair,et al.  Polydomy and the organization of foraging in a colony of the Malaysian giant ant Camponotus gigas (Hym. / Form.) , 1998, Oecologia.

[17]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[18]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions , 2004, Nature.

[19]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  How do ants assess food volume? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Debashish Chowdhury,et al.  Self-organized patterns and traffic flow in Colonies of organisms: from bacteria and social insects to vertebrates , 2004, q-bio/0401006.

[21]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies. I. Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources , 1987 .

[22]  M. Burd,et al.  Traffic Dynamics of the Leaf‐Cutting Ant, Atta cephalotes , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[24]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns: Testing a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1991, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[25]  W. H. Whitcomb,et al.  Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. , 1970 .

[26]  I D Couzin,et al.  Self-organized lane formation and optimized traffic flow in army ants , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[28]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[29]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research , 2004 .

[30]  T. Matsumoto,et al.  Foraging organization of the open-air processional lichenfeeding termite Hospitalitermes (Isoptera, Termitidae) in Borneo , 1998, Insectes Sociaux.

[31]  U. Maschwitz,et al.  Foraging of a hypogaeic army ant: a long neglected majority , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.