Two experiments were conducted to examine the ways in which the visual estimation of distance to a target is affected by constraints perceived to be placed on the subsequent locomotion to the target without vision. We hypothesized that an appraisal of impending effort would play a role in ascertaining the distance to be walked. In Experiment 1, the amount of resistance to walking was variable and unpredictable. One group of subjects performed against relatively low resistance, whereas another group performed against substantially greater resistance. In the low-resistance condition, no significant differences in CE, VE, time to target, or number of steps to target were found between any of the eight combinations of predictable or unpredictable resistances during walking. In the high-resistance condition, however, significant differences were found for CE and number of strides to target when resistance varied unpredictably during walking. Experiment 2 was similar in design but required subjects to walk with combinations of normal or short steps after they had viewed the target knowing only the gait type that would be used to begin locomotion. No differences in CE, VE, or time to target were found between four different combinations of gait type and predictability, under subjectively controlled conditions. When the step constraints were externally imposed, however, differences were found for CE. None of the results from either experiment, in which the number of strides needed to reach the target or the predictability of gait did not change from normal, supported the hypothesis that motor output requirements are necessary in forming a mental representation of the target position that can be used to walk to the target with eyes closed. Whichever locomotor technique was used to walk the estimated distance in these cases, the representation was able to be used independently. When walking mechanics were altered by externally imposed constraints, however, the success at reaching the estimated target position was reduced. These latter results are consistent with those obtained using up, down, and level walking and support the premise that mental representations used in blind walking are linked to the locomotor mechanics afforded by environmental conditions.
[1]
M A Goodale,et al.
The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist?
,
1988,
Journal of motor behavior.
[2]
D. Elliott.
Continuous visual information may be important after all: a failure to replicate Thomson (1983).
,
1986,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3]
D. Elliott,et al.
The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation.
,
1987,
Journal of motor behavior.
[4]
Peter Johnson.
The Functional Equivalence of Imagery and Movement
,
1982,
The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[5]
A. Patla,et al.
Locomotor Estimation of Distance after Visual Scanning by Children and Adults
,
1985,
Perception.
[6]
J. Thomson.
How do we use visual information to control locomotion?
,
1980,
Trends in Neurosciences.
[7]
J. Corlett.
The effect of environmental cues on locomotor distance estimation by children and adults
,
1986
.
[8]
J. Thomson.
Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion?
,
1983,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[9]
J. Thomson.
Intermittent versus continuous visual control: a reply to Elliott.
,
1986,
Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[10]
David N. Lee,et al.
Regulation of gait in long jumping.
,
1982
.