Environmental interference factors affecting detection range in acoustic telemetry studies using fixed receiver arrays

Historically, acoustic telemetry studies tracking movement of aquatic organisms have lacked rigorous, long-term evaluations of detection range. The purpose of the present study was to identify potential sources of variability in long-term acoustic telemetry data, focusing specifically on environmental variability. The study was conducted for 15 mo in Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary, Georgia, USA, using 2 submersible Vemco VR2W hydrophone receivers and 2 stationary range test transmitters (controls). Tag detections (±1 SE) decreased from 54.2 ± 2.5 to 11.4 ± 0.5 detections d �1 as transmission distance increased from 100 to 300 m. Detections varied seasonally (likely due to stratification), with the direction of flood and ebb tidal currents (12.4 h cycle), and with tidal current speed (6.2 h cycle). Tides explained up to 92% of the short-term variability in hourly detection data. Detections also increased or decreased during episodic weather events depending on the season and type of event. These results suggest that stationary control tags are useful for characterizing variability in sound transmission in open water marine acoustic telemetry studies.

[1]  James C Preisig,et al.  Performance analysis of adaptive equalization for coherent acoustic communications in the time-varying ocean environment. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D M Webber,et al.  Design and calibration of an acoustic telemetry system subject to upwelling events , 2009 .

[3]  Paul A van Walree,et al.  Coherent acoustic communication in a tidal estuary with busy shipping traffic. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  B. Smith,et al.  Underwater Acoustics , 1971, Nature.

[5]  D. M. Webber,et al.  Performance of remote acoustic receivers within a coral reef habitat: implications for array design , 2012, Coral Reefs.

[6]  Alistair J. Hobday,et al.  Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and deployment of listening station arrays , 2006 .

[7]  S. Cadrin,et al.  Movement patterns of winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) in the southern Gulf of Maine: observationswith the use of passive acoustic telemetry , 2010 .

[8]  Catherine R. Edwards,et al.  Comparison of Buoy-Mounted and Bottom-Moored ADCP Performance at Gray’s Reef , 2007 .

[9]  S. Szedlmayer,et al.  Site fidelity, residence time and movements of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus estimated with long-term acoustic monitoring , 2011 .

[10]  Richard D. Hedger,et al.  Environmental influence on transmitter detection probability in biotelemetry: developing a general model of acoustic transmission , 2013 .

[11]  James Preisig,et al.  Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development , 2006, Underwater Networks.

[12]  Josep Alós,et al.  Contrasting Fish Behavior in Artificial Seascapes with Implications for Resources Conservation , 2013, PloS one.

[13]  Angela B. Collins,et al.  Variation in the performance of acoustic receivers and its implication for positioning algorithms in a riverine setting , 2008 .

[14]  Wing,et al.  Spatial structure of relaxation events and crab settlement in the northern California upwelling system , 1995 .

[15]  Colin A. Simpfendorfer,et al.  Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers , 2008 .

[16]  Jayson M. Semmens,et al.  Interpreting diel activity patterns from acoustic telemetry: the need for controls , 2010 .

[17]  L. Dill,et al.  Habitat use and foraging behavior of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) in a seagrass ecosystem , 2002 .

[18]  C. Torrence,et al.  A Practical Guide to Wavelet Analysis. , 1998 .

[19]  The numerical solution of acoustic propagation through dispersive moving media , 2009, OCEANS 2009.

[20]  M. Kendall,et al.  Benthic Mapping Using Sonar, Video Transects, and an Innovative Approach to Accuracy Assessment: A Characterization of Bottom Features in the Georgia Bight , 2005 .

[21]  James C. Preisig Acoustic propagation considerations for underwater acoustic communications network development , 2007 .

[22]  Paul Hursky,et al.  Effects of ocean thermocline variability on noncoherent underwater acoustic communications. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  W. Large,et al.  Open Ocean Momentum Flux Measurements in Moderate to Strong Winds , 1981 .

[24]  H. Seim,et al.  Complex EOF Analysis as a Method to Separate Barotropic and Baroclinic Velocity Structure in Shallow Water , 2008 .

[25]  A. Shanks Mechanisms of cross-shelf transport of crab megalopae inferred from a time series of daily abundance , 2006 .

[26]  C. Tindle,et al.  Temporal patterns in ambient noise of biological origin from a shallow water temperate reef , 2008, Oecologia.

[27]  Simon de Lestang,et al.  Acoustic tracking: issues affecting design, analysis and interpretation of data from movement studies , 2012 .