Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the clinical beam commissioning results and lateral penumbra characteristics of our new pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using a multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) calculated by use of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. Eighteen collimated uniform dose plans for cubic targets were optimized by the RayStation 9A treatment planning system (TPS), varying scan area, modulation widths, measurement depths, and collimator angles. To test the patient‐specific measurements, we also created and verified five clinically realistic PBS plans with the MLC, such as the liver, prostate, base‐of‐skull, C‐shape, and head‐and‐neck. The verification measurements consist of the depth dose (DD), lateral profile (LP), and absolute dose (AD). We compared the LPs and ADs between the calculation and measurements. For the cubic plans, the gamma index pass rates (γ‐passing) were on average 96.5% ± 4.0% at 3%/3 mm for the DD and 95.2% ± 7.6% at 2%/2 mm for the LP. In several LP measurements less than 75 mm depths, the γ‐passing deteriorated (increased the measured doses) by less than 90% with the scattering such as the MLC edge and range shifter. The deteriorated γ‐passing was satisfied by more than 90% at 2%/2 mm using uncollimated beams instead of collimated beams except for three planes. The AD differences and the lateral penumbra width (80%–20% distance) were within ±1.9% and ± 1.1 mm, respectively. For the clinical plan measurements, the γ‐passing of LP at 2%/2 mm and the AD differences were 97.7% ± 4.2% on average and within ±1.8%, respectively. The measurements were in good agreement with the calculations of both the cubic and clinical plans inserted in the MLC except for LPs less than 75 mm regions of some cubic and clinical plans. The calculation errors in collimated beams can be mitigated by substituting uncollimated beams.

[1]  T. Yamashita,et al.  Dose distribution effects of spot-scanning proton beam therapy equipped with a multi-leaf collimator for pediatric brain tumors , 2021, Oncology letters.

[2]  Hosang Jin,et al.  Performance evaluation of adaptive aperture's static and dynamic collimation in a compact pencil beam scanning proton therapy system: A dosimetric comparison study for multiple disease sites. , 2020, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[3]  X. Zhu,et al.  Clinical commissioning of intensity modulated proton therapy systems: Report of AAPM Task Group 185. , 2020, Medical physics.

[4]  Minglei Kang,et al.  Commissioning and Beam Characterization of The First Gantry-Mounted Accelerator Pencil Beam Scanning Proton System. , 2019, Medical physics.

[5]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using a realistic lung phantom , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[6]  M. Kuroda,et al.  Dose distribution of intensity-modulated proton therapy with and without a multi-leaf collimator for the treatment of maxillary sinus cancer: a comparative effectiveness study , 2019, Radiation Oncology.

[7]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Validation of the RayStation Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm using realistic animal tissue phantoms , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[8]  T. Wong,et al.  Parametric characterization of penumbra reduction for aperture-collimated pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy , 2019, Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.

[9]  A. Lomax,et al.  Contour scanning, multi-leaf collimation and the combination thereof for proton pencil beam scanning , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  T. Suh,et al.  Investigations of line scanning proton therapy with dynamic multi-leaf collimator. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  C. Bäumer,et al.  Collimated proton pencil-beam scanning for superficial targets: impact of the order of range shifter and aperture , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  A. Lomax,et al.  A study of lateral fall-off (penumbra) optimisation for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Robert J. Shirey,et al.  Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[14]  C. Omachi,et al.  Evaluation of dosimetric advantages of using patient‐specific aperture system with intensity‐modulated proton therapy for the shallow depth tumor , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[15]  Tony Wong,et al.  Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  A J Lomax,et al.  Contour scanning for penumbra improvement in pencil beam scanned proton therapy , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  T. Wong,et al.  Clinical Commissioning of a Pencil Beam Scanning Treatment Planning System for Proton Therapy. , 2016, International journal of particle therapy.

[18]  T. Solberg,et al.  Technical Note: A treatment plan comparison between dynamic collimation and a fixed aperture during spot scanning proton therapy for brain treatment. , 2016, Medical physics.

[19]  Adam Henry Aitkenhead,et al.  A Monte Carlo study on the collimation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy beams. , 2016, Medical physics.

[20]  H. Shirato,et al.  Development and evaluation of a short-range applicator for treating superficial moving tumors with respiratory-gated spot-scanning proton therapy using real-time image guidance , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Y. Shibamoto,et al.  A patient-specific aperture system with an energy absorber for spot scanning proton beams: Verification for clinical application. , 2015, Medical physics.

[22]  T. Solberg,et al.  Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes , 2015, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[23]  R. Mohan,et al.  Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. , 2013, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[24]  Heng Li,et al.  Use of treatment log files in spot scanning proton therapy as part of patient-specific quality assurance. , 2013, Medical physics.

[25]  R. Mohan,et al.  Robust optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  H. Paganetti,et al.  Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Potential benefits of scanned intensity-modulated proton therapy versus advanced photon therapy with regard to sparing of the salivary glands in oropharyngeal cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  Anders Forsgren,et al.  Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[29]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Intensity-modulated proton therapy reduces the dose to normal tissue compared with intensity-modulated radiation therapy or passive scattering proton therapy and enables individualized radical radiotherapy for extensive stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: a virtual clinical study. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  J. Mechalakos,et al.  IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. , 2009, Medical physics.

[31]  C. Allgower,et al.  Clinical characterization of a proton beam continuous uniform scanning system with dose layer stacking. , 2008, Medical physics.

[32]  Matthias Fippel,et al.  A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  E Pedroni,et al.  Experimental characterization and physical modelling of the dose distribution of scanned proton pencil beams , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[35]  M Goitein,et al.  A pencil beam algorithm for proton dose calculations. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  I. Rinaldi,et al.  Proton theraPy sPecial feature: full PaPer Beam commissioning of the first compact proton therapy system with spot scanning and dynamic field collimation , 2020 .

[37]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. , 1995, Medical physics.