Nanoparticle emissions from a heavy-duty engine running on alternative diesel fuels.

We have studied the effect of three different fuels (fossil diesel fuel (EN590); rapeseed methyl ester (RME); and synthetic gas-to-liquid (GTL)) on heavy-duty diesel engine emissions. Our main focus was on nanoparticle emissions of the engine. Our results show that the particle emissions from a modern diesel engine run with EN590, GTL, or RME consisted of two partly nonvolatile modes that were clearly separated in particle size. The concentration and geometric mean diameter of nonvolatile nucleation mode cores measured with RME were substantially greater than with the other fuels. The soot particle concentration and soot particle size were lowest with RME. With EN590 and GTL, a similar engine load dependence of the nonvolatile nucleation mode particle size and concentration imply a similar formation mechanism of the particles. For RME, the nonvolatile core particle size was larger and the concentration dependence on engine load was clearly different from that of EN590 and GTL. This indicates that the formation mechanism of the core particles is different for RME. This can be explained by differences in the fuel characteristics.

[1]  C. O'Dowd,et al.  Evaluating measurements of new particle concentrations, source rates, and spatial scales during coastal nucleation events using condensation particle counters , 2002 .

[2]  Liisa Pirjola,et al.  Heavy duty diesel engine exhaust aerosol particle and ion measurements. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  John M. E. Storey,et al.  Emission Performance of Selected Biodiesel Fuels , 2003 .

[4]  B. Buchholz,et al.  A Numerical Investigation into the Anomalous Slight NOx Increase when Burning Biodiesel: A New (Old) Theory , 2007 .

[5]  A. De Filippo,et al.  Diesel nucleation mode particles: semivolatile or solid? , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  G. Oberdörster,et al.  Nanotoxicology: An Emerging Discipline Evolving from Studies of Ultrafine Particles , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  On-line measurements of diesel nanoparticle composition and volatility , 2003 .

[8]  F. Yu,et al.  Role of the binary H2SO4–H2O homogeneous nucleation in the formation of volatile nanoparticles in the vehicular exhaust , 2006 .

[9]  Jyrki Ristimäki,et al.  Sampling method for particle measurements of vehicle exhaust , 2001 .

[10]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engines , 1998 .

[11]  A. C. Barone,et al.  Measurements of nanoparticles of organic carbon and soot in flames and vehicle exhausts. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Liisa Pirjola,et al.  Nucleation mode particles with a nonvolatile core in the exhaust of a heavy duty diesel vehicle. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  M. Graboski,et al.  Impact of biodiesel source material and chemical structure on emissions of criteria pollutants from a heavy-duty engine. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Yukio Akasaka,et al.  Exhaust Emissions of a DI Diesel Engine Fueled with Blends of Biodiesel and Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel , 1997 .

[15]  Richard C. Flagan,et al.  Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer , 1989 .

[16]  Tiegang Fang,et al.  Characterization of particle size distribution from diesel engines fueled with palm-biodiesel blends and paraffinic fuel blends , 2008 .

[17]  A. S. Cheng,et al.  Investigation of the impact of biodiesel fuelling on NO x emissions using an optical direct injection diesel engine , 2006 .

[18]  J. Keskinen,et al.  Effect of oxidation catalysts on diesel soot particles. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Koji Kitano,et al.  GTL Fuel Impact on DI Diesel Emissions , 2007 .

[20]  Chris Sharp,et al.  The Effect of Biodiesel Fuels on Transient Emissions from Modern Diesel Engines, Part I Regulated Emissions and Performance , 2000 .

[21]  Jon H. Van Gerpen,et al.  Fuel Properties and Engine Performance for Biodiesel Prepared from Modified Feedstocks , 1997 .

[22]  Heinz Fissan,et al.  Design and evaluation of a nanometer aerosol differential mobility analyzer (Nano-DMA) , 1998 .

[23]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Fischer-Tropsch Diesel Fuels - Properties and Exhaust Emissions: A Literature Review , 2003 .

[24]  S. Boland,et al.  Airborne particles evoke an inflammatory response in human airway epithelium. Activation of transcription factors , 2004, Cell Biology and Toxicology.

[25]  W. MacNee,et al.  Combustion-derived nanoparticles: A review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[26]  Richard Hugh Clark,et al.  Emissions Performance of Shell GTL Fuel in the Context of Future Fuel Specifications , 2006 .

[27]  J. C. Ball,et al.  The Formation of Reactive Oxygen Species Catalyzed by Neutral, Aqueous Extracts of NIST Ambient Particulate Matter and Diesel Engine Particles , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[28]  N. Clark,et al.  Emissions from nine heavy trucks fueled by diesel and biodiesel blend without engine modification , 2000 .

[29]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols-Part1: Summary of diesel engine results , 2006 .

[30]  Nils-Olof Nylund,et al.  Particle Emissions at Moderate and Cold Temperatures Using Different Fuels , 2003 .

[31]  Leonidas Ntziachristos,et al.  Electrical Filter Stage for the ELPI , 2002 .

[32]  Athanasios Tsolakis,et al.  Effects on Particle Size Distribution from the Diesel Engine Operating on RME-Biodiesel with EGR , 2006 .

[33]  Robert L. McCormick,et al.  Regulated Emissions from Biodiesel Tested in Heavy-Duty Engines Meeting 2004 Emission Standards , 2005 .

[34]  D. Kittelson.  Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[35]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .