Selective imaging of adherent targeted ultrasound contrast agents

The goal of ultrasonic molecular imaging is the detection of targeted contrast agents bound to receptors on endothelial cells. We propose imaging methods that can distinguish adherent microbubbles from tissue and from freely circulating microbubbles, each of which would otherwise obscure signal from molecularly targeted adherent agents. The methods are based on a harmonic signal model of the returned echoes over a train of pulses. The first method utilizes an 'image-push-image' pulse sequence where adhesion of contrast agents is rapidly promoted by acoustic radiation force and the presence of adherent agents is detected by the signal change due to targeted microbubble adhesion. The second method rejects tissue echoes using a spectral high-pass filter. Free agent signal is suppressed by a pulse-to-pulse low-pass filter in both methods. An overlay of the adherent and/or flowing contrast agents on B-mode images can be readily created for anatomical reference. Contrast-to-tissue ratios from adherent microbubbles exceeding 30 dB and 20 dB were achieved for the two methods proposed, respectively. The performance of these algorithms is compared, emphasizing the significance and potential applications in ultrasonic molecular imaging.

[1]  S. Kaul,et al.  Noninvasive Imaging of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury Using Leukocyte-Targeted Contrast Echocardiography , 2002, Circulation.

[2]  E. Unger,et al.  In vitro studies of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  K. Ferrara,et al.  A new imaging strategy using wideband transient response of ultrasound contrast agents , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[4]  Ralph Weissleder,et al.  Molecular imaging in the clinical arena. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  P. Dayton,et al.  Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: effect of transmitted phase and bubble size , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine. , 2005, Cancer research.

[7]  R. J. Fornaris,et al.  A swept-scanning mode for estimation of blood velocity in the microvasculature , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Jonathan R Lindner,et al.  Molecular imaging with contrast ultrasound and targeted microbubbles , 2004, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[9]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.

[10]  V. Algazi,et al.  A statistical analysis of the received signal from blood during laminar flow , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[12]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  P J Lund,et al.  Evaluation of new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[14]  Katherine W. Ferrara,et al.  A new high resolution color flow system using an eigendecomposition-based adaptive filter for clutter rejection , 2002 .

[15]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004, Molecular imaging.

[16]  Nico De Jong,et al.  Contrast superharmonic imaging: a feasibility study. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Targeted imaging using ultrasound , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. , 2005, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[20]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Detection of Individual Microbubbles of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Imaging of Free-Floating and Targeted Bubbles , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[21]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v-Integrins , 2003, Circulation.

[23]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[24]  S A Wickline,et al.  Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. , 2003, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[25]  D. Lohse,et al.  Response of bubbles to diagnostic ultrasound: a unifying theoretical approach , 1998, cond-mat/9805217.

[26]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[27]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[28]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Molecular and Cellular Imaging with Targeted Contrast Ultrasound , 2005, Proceedings of the IEEE.