Solvent and side‐chain contributions to the two‐cis ⇄ all‐trans equilibria of cyclic hexapeptides, cyclo(Xxx‐Pro‐D‐Yyy)2

Cyclic hexapeptides of the type cyclo(L‐Xxx‐L‐Pro‐D‐Yyy)2 or cyclo(L‐Xxx‐L‐Pro‐Gly)2 exist in solution predominantly in two forms of C2 average symmetry, one with all‐trans peptide bonds and generally well‐established conformation, and another with both Xxx‐Pro peptide bonds cis. We have been measuring the thermodynamic parameters of this equilibrium using carbon and proton nmr spectroscopy. Data have been obtained for peptides in which Yyy = Gly, D‐Ala, or D‐Phe, and Xxx = Gly, L‐Ala, L‐Leu, and L‐Val. In a given solvent, stability of the all‐trans form decreases (ΔG0 increases) as Xxx is changed through the series Gly, L‐Ala‐, L‐Leu, and L‐Val, consistent with expected increasing repulsion between the Xxx side chain and the proline δ methylene across the trnas Xxx‐Pro bond. Also, for a given set of side chains, the stability of the all‐trnas form increases as the polarity of the solvent decreases, consistent with models in which all CO and NH groups are accessible for solvation in the two‐cis form, but two CO and two NH groups are somewhat sequestered in the all‐trans form. With the available data it is not possible to identify pure intramolecular (solvent‐independent) or pure peptide‐bond solvation (side chain‐independent) terms in ΔH° or ΔS°, although trends are discernible.

[1]  A. Tonelli.  Conformational characteristics of polypeptides containing isolated L-proline residues with cis peptide bonds. , 1974, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  B. Pullman,et al.  The conformational energy map of an alanyl residue preceding proline: a quantum-mechanical approach. , 1970, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  K. Kopple,et al.  Conformation of cyclic peptides. 8. Cyclic hexapeptides containing the L-Pro-D-Phe sequence. , 1974, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  R. Drago,et al.  Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of Hydrogen Bonding , 1966 .

[5]  J N Brown,et al.  Crystal structure and molecular conformation of the hydrated cyclic hexapeptide cyclo(L-Ala-L-Pro-D-Phe)2. , 1976, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Influence of local interactions on protein structure. I. Conformational energy studies of N‐acetyl‐N′‐methylamides of pro‐X and X‐pro dipeptides , 1977, Biopolymers.

[7]  P J Flory,et al.  Conformational energies and configurational statistics of copolypeptides containing L-proline. , 1968, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  K. Kopple,et al.  Conformation of cyclic peptides. VII. Cyclic hexapeptides containing the D-Phe-L-Pro sequence. , 1973, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[9]  P. Santis,et al.  Allowed Conformations of Alanyl preceding Prolyl Residues , 1970, Nature.

[10]  A. R. Srinivasan,et al.  Solvent accessibilities in glycyl, alanyl and seryl dipeptides. , 1977, The Biochemical journal.

[11]  W. E. Thiessen,et al.  Crystal structure and molecular conformation of the cyclic hexapeptide cyclo-(Gly-L-Pro-Gly)2 , 1979 .

[12]  I. Siemion,et al.  Influence of the Distance of the Proline Carbonyl from the β and γ Carbon on the 13C Chemical Shifts , 1975 .

[13]  E. Blout,et al.  Cyclic peptides. 3. Solution conformations of cyclo(serylprolylglycylserylprolylglycyl) from nuclear magnetic resonance. , 1972, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[14]  Isaac N. Gibra.  Probability and Statistical Inference for Scientists and Engineers , 1973 .

[15]  E. Blout,et al.  Cyclic peptides. V. 1 H and 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance determination of the preferred beta conformation for proline-containing cyclic hexapeptides. , 1973, Journal of the American Chemical Society.