Avalanche Photodiodes in High-Speed Receiver Systems

The avalanche photodiode (APD) is widely used in optical fibre communications (Campbell, 2007) due to its ability to achieve high internal gain at relatively high speeds and low excess noise (Wei et al., 2002), thus improving the system signal-to-noise ratio. Its internal mechanism of gain or avalanche multiplication is a result of successive impact ionisation events. In an optical receiver system, the advantage of internal gain, in the APD, is experienced when the amplifier noise dominates that of a unity-gain photodiode. This increases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ultimately improves the receiver sensitivity as the gain increases until the APD noise rises to become dominant. Indium Phosphide (InP) is widely used as the multiplication layer material in commercially available APDs for applications in the 0.9–1.7μm wavelength region with In0.53Ga0.47As grown lattice-matched to it as the absorption layer. It has been predicted that Indium Alluminium Arsenide (In0.52Al0.48As) will replace InP, as a more favourable multiplication layer material due to its lower excess noise characteristics (Kinsey et al., 2000). In comparison to InP, tunnelling currents remain lower in InAlAs due to its larger bandgap. While holes ionise more readily than electrons in InP, the opposite holds true for InAlAs and InGaAs, as electrons ionise more readily than holes; thus making the InGaAs/InAlAs combination superior to InGaAs/InP in a SAM APD, in terms of lower excess noise, higher gain-bandwidth product, and improved sensitivity. Studies have also shown that the breakdown voltage of InAlAs APDs is less temperature dependent compared to InP (Tan et al., 2010), which would be useful in temperature sensitive applications, thus making temperature control less critical. The sensitivity performance criterion for digital receivers is its bit-error rate (BER), which is the probability of an error in the bit-identification by the receiver. The receiver sensitivity is defined as the minimum average optical power to operate at a certain BER; 10-12 being a common standard for digital optical receivers. The sensitivity of APD-based high speed optical receivers is governed by three main competing factors, namely the excess noise, avalanche-buildup time and dark current of the APD. Generally, the excess noise and avalanche-buildup time increases with APD gain. Thus, for a fixed multiplication layer thickness, there is a sensitivity-optimised gain that offers a balance between SNR while keeping the degrading contributions from the excess noise factor and intersymbolinterference (ISI) at a minimum. More importantly, changing the thickness of the multiplication layer strongly affects the receiver sensitivity, as the aforementioned three

[1]  Joe C. Campbell,et al.  GaN avalanche photodiodes , 2000 .

[2]  R. Mcintyre Multiplication noise in uniform avalanche diodes , 1966 .

[3]  R. Baertsch Low-frequency noise measurements in silicon avalanche photodiodes , 1966 .

[4]  Chee Hing Tan,et al.  Excess noise measurement in avalanche photodiodes using a transimpedance amplifier front-end , 2006 .

[5]  J. David,et al.  A simple model to determine multiplication and noise in avalanche photodiodes , 1998 .

[6]  J. C. Dries,et al.  Optimization of 10-Gb/s long-wavelength floating guard ring InGaAs-InP avalanche photodiodes , 2002, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[7]  M. Hopkinson,et al.  Excess Avalanche Noise in $\hbox{In}_{0.52}\hbox{Al}_{0.48}\hbox{As}$ , 2007, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[8]  H. Ando,et al.  Ionization coefficient measurement in GaAs by using multiplication noise characteristics , 1981 .

[9]  Y. L. Goh,et al.  A Comparison of the Lower Limit of Multiplication Noise in InP and InAlAs Based APDs for Telecommunications Receiver Applications , 2006, LEOS 2006 - 19th Annual Meeting of the IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society.

[10]  G. E. Stillman,et al.  Chapter 5 Avalanche Photodiodes , 1977 .

[11]  J.C. Campbell,et al.  Recent Advances in Telecommunications Avalanche Photodiodes , 2007, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[12]  Stephen R. Forrest,et al.  Evidence for tunneling in reverse‐biased III‐V photodetector diodes , 1980 .

[13]  J. David,et al.  Optimization of InP APDs for High-Speed Lightwave Systems , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  S. Forrest,et al.  In0.53Ga0.47As photodiodes with dark current limited by generation‐recombination and tunneling , 1980 .

[15]  C. Tan,et al.  Avalanche Noise Characteristics in Submicron InP Diodes , 2008, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[16]  Dieter Bimberg,et al.  Wide‐band frequency response measurements of photodetectors using low‐level photocurrent noise detection , 1993 .

[17]  Chee Hing Tan,et al.  Temperature Dependence of Avalanche Breakdown in InP and InAlAs , 2010, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics.

[18]  M. Hopkinson,et al.  Avalanche Multiplication in InAlAs , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[19]  G. Agrawal Fiber‐Optic Communication Systems , 2021 .

[20]  Jasprit Singh,et al.  Semiconductor Optoelectronics: Physics and Technology , 1995 .

[21]  B.E.A. Saleh,et al.  Statistical correlation of gain and buildup time in APDs and its effects on receiver performance , 2006, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[22]  John P. R. David,et al.  Avalanche multiplication noise characteristics in thin GaAs p/sup +/-i-n/sup +/ diodes , 1998 .