Bilateral Ultrathin Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty vs. Bilateral Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fuchs’ Dystrophy: Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations, Contrast Sensitivity and Quality of Life

Background and Objectives: The objective of this paper is to compare the visual outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after bilateral ultrathin Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) with bilateral penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy (FED). Materials and Methods: Retrospective comparative cohort study, including 11 patients with FED who underwent bilateral PK and 13 patients with FED who underwent bilateral UT-DSAEK. All patients were already pseudophakic or had undergone a combined cataract procedure. The main outcomes were corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs), contrast sensitivity (CS) and quality of life (QoL). Results: The mean follow-up after the second eye surgery was 32.5 ± 10.2 months in PK and 19.6 ± 8.6 months in UT-DSAEK patients. The CDVA in the UT-DSAEK group was significantly better than in the PK one (0.18 ± 0.07 vs. 0.35 ± 0.16 logMAR, p < 0.0001). The mean anterior corneal total HOAs of the central 5 mm were significantly lower in UT-DSAEK eyes than in PK eyes (0.438 ± 0.078 µ and 1.282 ± 0.330 µ respectively, p < 0.0001), whilst the mean posterior total HOAs did not differ between groups (0.196 ± 0.056 µ and 0.231 ± 0.089 µ, respectively, p = 0.253). The CS was lower at 0.75 and 1.5 cycles/degree in P the K group when compared to the DSAEK one (p = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). The QoL scores by the NEI RQL-42 test exhibited better values in DSAEK patients in 9 out of 13 scales. Conclusion: Our study confirms that UT-DSAEK provides a better visual function in terms of CDVA and CS, together with lower HOAs, when compared to PK. Hence, the vision-related QoL, binocularly evaluated by the NEI RQL-42 items, indicates a higher satisfaction in UT-DSAEK eyes.

[1]  C. Temstet,et al.  Influence of graft thickness and regularity on vision recovery after endothelial keratoplasty , 2019, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  M. Ang,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  G. Giannaccare,et al.  Five-Year Outcomes of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2019, Cornea.

[4]  J. Rose-Nussbaumer,et al.  Corneal Higher-Order Aberrations in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Ultrathin DSAEK in the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Rose-Nussbaumer,et al.  Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial: A Randomized Trial Comparing Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty with Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[6]  D. Sousa,et al.  DMEK versus DSAEK for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy: A meta-analysis , 2019, European journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  M. Nordlund,et al.  Comparison of Visual Acuity Outcomes Between Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2018, Cornea.

[8]  E. Holland,et al.  Technique for Preparing Ultrathin and Nanothin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue , 2018, Cornea.

[9]  A. Shortt,et al.  Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure. , 2016, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  Marcus Ang,et al.  Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Rebubbling for Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[12]  T. Berendschot,et al.  A Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus DSAEK. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[13]  M. Rajan,et al.  Visual Outcomes and Graft Thickness in Microthin DSAEK—One-Year Results , 2015, Cornea.

[14]  J. Mehta,et al.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity following Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[15]  A. Joussen,et al.  Retrospective contralateral study comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2015, Eye.

[16]  Yang Gao,et al.  Clinical outcomes of non-torque pattern double running suture technique for optical penetrating keratoplasty. , 2015, International journal of clinical and experimental medicine.

[17]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Vision-related quality of life before and after keratoplasty for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[18]  A. Casuccio,et al.  Working-age cataract patients: visual results, reading performance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses. , 2014, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[19]  T. Berendschot,et al.  Effects of graft thickness and asymmetry on visual gain and aberrations after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, JAMA ophthalmology.

[20]  V. Scorcia,et al.  Ultrathin descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[21]  G. Yoon,et al.  Visual performance with wave aberration correction after penetrating, deep anterior lamellar, or endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  D. Tan,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution. , 2012, Survey of ophthalmology.

[23]  K. Nishida,et al.  Characteristic higher-order aberrations of the anterior and posterior corneal surfaces in 3 corneal transplantation techniques. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  F. Kruse,et al.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[25]  K. Tsubota,et al.  The contribution of the posterior surface to the corneal aberrations in eyes after keratoplasty. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[26]  Jonathan E. Moore,et al.  Subscale assessment of the NEI-RQL-42 questionnaire with Rasch analysis. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[27]  E. Holland,et al.  Comparison of Central Corneal Graft Thickness to Visual Acuity Outcomes in Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[28]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Comparison of Corneal Thickness and Haze in DSAEK and Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[29]  R. Bowman,et al.  Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[30]  H. Hayashi,et al.  Comparison of visual function between phakic eyes and pseudophakic eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  V. Scorcia,et al.  Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[32]  I. Bahar,et al.  Retrospective Contralateral Study Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty With Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2009, Cornea.

[33]  Geunyoung Yoon,et al.  Posterior corneal aberrations and their compensation effects on anterior corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  C. Macaluso Closed-chamber pulling-injection system for donor graft insertion in endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[35]  M. Mannis,et al.  Corneal Suturing Techniques , 2007 .

[36]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratome-dissected and manually dissected donor tissue. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[37]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.

[38]  Ron D Hays,et al.  Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute-Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[39]  R. Hays,et al.  Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[40]  R. Hays,et al.  Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[41]  A. Adamis,et al.  Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy of the cornea. , 1993, Survey of ophthalmology.