Decision-making, cognitive functions, impulsivity, and media multitasking expectancies in high versus low media multitaskers

In several studies, individuals who reported to frequently multitask with different media displayed reduced cognitive performance, for example in fluid intelligence and executive functioning. These cognitive functions are relevant for making advantageous decisions under both objective risk (requiring reflection and strategical planning) and ambiguous risk (requiring learning from feedback). Thus, compared to low media multitaskers (LMMs), high media multitaskers (HMMs) may perform worse in both types of decision situations. The current study investigated HMMs and LMMs in a laboratory setting with the Game of Dice Task (GDT; objective risk), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT; ambiguous risk), various tests quantifying cognitive functions (logical reasoning, working memory, information processing, general executive functions), and self-report measures of impulsivity, media multitasking expectancies, and problematic Internet use. From 182 participants, 25 HMMs and 19 LMMs were identified using the Media Multitasking Index. Results show that HMMs compared to LMMs performed weaker on the IGT but not on the GDT. Furthermore, HMMs had slightly decreased performance in tests of logical reasoning and working memory capacity. HMMs tended to increased information processing speed but this difference was not significant. Furthermore, HMMs have more positive expectancies regarding media multitasking and reported higher tendencies toward problematic Internet use. HMMs and LMMs did not differ significantly with respect to impulsivity and executive functions. The results give a first hint that HMMs may have difficulties in decision-making under ambiguous but not under objective risk. HMMs may be more prone to errors in tasks that require feedback processing. However, HMMs appear not to be impaired in aspects of long-term strategic decision-making.

[1]  Rüdiger Hilker,et al.  Decision-Making Impairments in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease , 2005, Behavioural neurology.

[2]  L. Timmermann,et al.  Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson's disease: A neuropsychological and psychophysiological study , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Meredith Minear,et al.  Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers , 2013, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[4]  Mirko Pawlikowski,et al.  Decision making with and without feedback: The role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles , 2009, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[5]  R. Baumeister,et al.  High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. , 2004, Journal of personality.

[6]  Keith E Stanovich,et al.  Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. , 2010, Clinical psychology review.

[7]  M. Brand,et al.  Prefrontal Control and Internet Addiction: A Theoretical Model and Review of Neuropsychological and Neuroimaging Findings , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  M. Brand,et al.  Age-related variance in decisions under ambiguity is explained by changes in reasoning, executive functions, and decision-making under risk , 2017, Cognition & emotion.

[9]  A. Lawrence,et al.  The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[10]  Patti M. Valkenburg,et al.  The consequences of media multitasking for youth: A review , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Common and distinct neural correlates of dual-tasking and task-switching: a meta-analytic review and a neuro-cognitive processing model of human multitasking , 2019, Brain Structure and Function.

[12]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Cognitive predictors of a common multitasking ability: Contributions from working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Kimberly Young,et al.  Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder , 1998, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[14]  Yoori Hwang,et al.  Why do media users multitask?: Motives for general, medium-specific, and content-specific types of multitasking , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  M. Brand,et al.  Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  H. Nelson.  A Modified Card Sorting Test Sensitive to Frontal Lobe Defects , 1976, Cortex.

[17]  D. Strayer,et al.  Who Multi-Tasks and Why? Multi-Tasking Ability, Perceived Multi-Tasking Ability, Impulsivity, and Sensation Seeking , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  M. Brand,et al.  Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: What does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions? , 2011, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[19]  Y. Sorokin.  Transient ischemic attack and ischemic stroke in the International Classification of Diseases 11th revision , 2019 .

[20]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Working Memory Dimensions as Differential Predictors of the Speed and Error Aspect of Multitasking Performance , 2006 .

[21]  P. Calabrese,et al.  DemTect: ein neues Screening-Verfahren zur Unterstützung der Demenzdiagnostik , 2000 .

[22]  Yoori Hwang,et al.  Media Multitasking Effects on Cognitive vs. Attitudinal Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis , 2016 .

[23]  Silke M. Mueller,et al.  Short- and long-term consequences in decision-making under risk: immediate feedback about long-term prospects benefits people tending to impulsive processing , 2017 .

[24]  E. Katz,et al.  Uses and Gratifications Research , 2019, The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies.

[25]  Young-Chul Shin,et al.  Impulsivity in Internet Addiction: A Comparison with Pathological Gambling , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[26]  Brandon C. W. Ralph,et al.  Media multitasking and failures of attention in everyday life , 2014, Psychological research.

[27]  J. Patton,et al.  Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. , 1995, Journal of clinical psychology.

[28]  S. Raffard,et al.  Do facets of self-reported impulsivity predict decision-making under ambiguity and risk? Evidence from a community sample , 2011, Psychiatry Research.

[29]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Media multitasking and behavioral measures of sustained attention , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[30]  M. Griffiths,et al.  Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. , 2014, Current pharmaceutical design.

[31]  Esther Fujiwara,et al.  Decision-making deficits of korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: associations with executive functions. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[32]  Matthias Brand,et al.  Validation and psychometric properties of a short version of Young's Internet Addiction Test , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Anastasia D. Elder,et al.  Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance , 2018, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[34]  Meagan M. Wood,et al.  The Effects of Age, Priming, and Working Memory on Decision-Making , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[35]  Annie Lang,et al.  Media Multitasking: Good, Bad, or Ugly? , 2015 .

[36]  M. Wetherell,et al.  The multitasking framework: the effects of increasing workload on acute psychobiological stress reactivity. , 2014, Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.

[37]  Augusta H. Bargeron,et al.  Psychosocial correlates of internet gaming disorder: Psychopathology, life satisfaction, and impulsivity , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Matthias Brand,et al.  Decision-making under risk conditions is susceptible to interference by a secondary executive task , 2011, Cognitive Processing.

[39]  Weiyu Zhang,et al.  Explicating multitasking with computers: Gratifications and situations , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  A. R. Lang,et al.  Approaching avoidance. A step essential to the understanding of craving. , 1999 .

[41]  Naomi S. Baron,et al.  Media Multitasking and Cognitive, Psychological, Neural, and Learning Differences , 2017, Pediatrics.

[42]  Stephen R. Mitroff,et al.  Distractor Filtering in Media Multitaskers , 2011 .

[43]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[44]  Anthony D. Wagner,et al.  Media multitasking and memory: Differences in working memory and long-term memory , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[45]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking , 2015 .

[46]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[47]  Matthew S Cain,et al.  Media multitasking in adolescence , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  Johannes Schiebener,et al.  Decision Making Under Objective Risk Conditions–a Review of Cognitive and Emotional Correlates, Strategies, Feedback Processing, and External Influences , 2015, Neuropsychology Review.

[49]  A. Wu,et al.  Psychological risk factors of addiction to social networking sites among Chinese smartphone users , 2013, Journal of behavioral addictions.

[50]  H. Sohn,et al.  Delayed transition from ambiguous to risky decision making in alcohol dependence during Iowa Gambling Task , 2011, Psychiatry Research.

[51]  M. Bühner,et al.  Multitasking behavior and its related constructs: Executive functions, working memory capacity, relational integration, and divided attention , 2019, Cognition.

[52]  Melissa T. Buelow,et al.  Personality characteristics and state mood influence individual deck selections on the Iowa Gambling Task , 2013 .

[53]  Fabian Grabenhorst,et al.  Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Cognitive control in media multitaskers , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  H. Damasio,et al.  Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  Mark W. Becker,et al.  The association between media multitasking, task-switching, and dual-task performance. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[57]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[58]  N. Fineberg,et al.  Cognitive deficits in problematic internet use: meta-analysis of 40 studies , 2019, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[59]  Andrew Webb,et al.  Media multitasking, impulsivity and dual task ability , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  M. Brand,et al.  Internet addiction: coping styles, expectancies, and treatment implications , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[61]  A. Miyake,et al.  The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions , 2012, Current directions in psychological science.

[62]  M. Delazer,et al.  Decision-making with explicit and stable rules in mild Alzheimer's disease , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  Matthew S Cain,et al.  Distractor filtering in media multitaskers. , 2010, Perception.

[64]  D. Leutner,et al.  Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning using dual-task methodology. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[65]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  The risk construct. , 1992 .

[66]  S. Dickman,et al.  Impulsivity, arousal and attention , 2000 .

[67]  John M. Tchernev,et al.  The “Myth” of Media Multitasking: Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications , 2012 .

[68]  Kelvin F H Lui,et al.  Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[69]  T. Robbins,et al.  The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors , 2019, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[70]  A. Damasio,et al.  39. Normal Aging May Compromise the Ability to Decide Advantageously , 2001 .

[71]  Hwanjo Yu,et al.  Personality Factors Predicting Smartphone Addiction Predisposition: Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Systems, Impulsivity, and Self-Control , 2016, PloS one.

[72]  M. Moisala,et al.  Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults , 2016, NeuroImage.

[73]  Matthias Brand,et al.  Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations , 2006, Neural Networks.

[74]  M. Brand,et al.  Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[75]  Jonathan S. A. Carriere,et al.  Absent-mindedness: Lapses of conscious awareness and everyday cognitive failures , 2006, Consciousness and Cognition.

[76]  A. Damasio,et al.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex , 1994, Cognition.

[77]  Q. Lu,et al.  Impulse inhibition in people with Internet addiction disorder: Electrophysiological evidence from a Go/NoGo study , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[78]  A. Bechara,et al.  Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[79]  Mirko Pawlikowski,et al.  Excessive Internet gaming and decision making: Do excessive World of Warcraft players have problems in decision making under risky conditions? , 2011, Psychiatry Research.

[80]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: what participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Damage to the Fronto-Polar Cortex Is Associated with Impaired Multitasking , 2008, PloS one.

[82]  I. Lyoo,et al.  Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and Internet addiction , 2004, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[83]  Adrian Meule,et al.  Psychometrische Evaluation der deutschen Barratt Impulsiveness Scale – Kurzversion (BIS-15) , 2011 .

[84]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .

[85]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[86]  Liqi Zhu,et al.  Predictors of media multitasking in Chinese adolescents. , 2016, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[87]  Catherine A. Cole,et al.  The Orbitofrontal Cortex, Real‐World Decision Making, and Normal Aging , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[88]  Melissa T. Buelow,et al.  Construct Validity of the Iowa Gambling Task , 2009, Neuropsychology Review.

[89]  R. Reitan.  Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[90]  S. Dickman,et al.  Impulsivity and information processing. , 1993 .