Towards the environmental sustainability assessment for the viticulture

During the last decades in Italy the wine sector focused on the environmental sustainability of the production processes, including the agricultural, the agro-industrial and the packaging phases. Recent surveys highlighted that the wine consumers are interested in the environmental certifications, even if they are not familiar with them. Several environmental pressures can be evaluated in the viticulture phase, but an elevated number of the analysed impacts require the collection of a large set of input data and significant efforts during the elaboration phase. Therefore, the aim of the present work was the identification of the inventory data and impacts, which mainly describe the environmental pressures associated with the viticulture phase. Particularly, the results of the life cycle assessment (LCA) were integrated with those of a model and a simplified approach for evaluating the risks due to the pesticides use. The LCA identified three phases, which are responsible of 70-80% of the CO 2 eq (CO 2 equivalent), the cumulated energy utilisation, the acidification potential (expressed in SO 2 equivalent) and the eutrophication (expressed in PO 4 equivalent), i.e. the harvesting, the crop protection and the ligature. The phase of the pesticides use was analysed also through the pesticides risk indicator (PERI) model and a simplified approach elaborated by the Regional Agency for the Environment Protection in Tuscany, Italy. Results concerning the environmental risk showed that the PERI model, the Arpat approach and the LCA were coherent for the pesticide mix highlighting that the associated environmental risk is more than doubled from 2004 to 2010. Finally, some operative indications were elaborated in order to reduce the impacts and improve the local and global environmental sustainability of the viticulture phase.

[1]  B. Rugani,et al.  Tapping carbon footprint variations in the European wine sector , 2013 .

[2]  H. Saxe,et al.  LCA-based comparison of the climate footprint of beer vs. wine & spirits. , 2010 .

[3]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  How to approach the assessment , 2012 .

[4]  M. Hauschild,et al.  USEtox human exposure and toxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties , 2011 .

[5]  S. Bosco,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural phase of wine production in the Maremma rural district in Tuscany, Italy , 2011 .

[6]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[7]  M. Hauschild,et al.  USEtox fate and ecotoxicity factors for comparative assessment of toxic emissions in life cycle analysis: sensitivity to key chemical properties , 2011 .

[8]  Sandro Sacchelli,et al.  Climate Change, Wine and Sustainability: A Quantitative Discourse Analysis of the International Scientific Literature , 2016 .

[9]  Ettore Settanni,et al.  Including more technology in the production of a quality wine: the importance of functional unit , 2010 .

[10]  David Chiaramonti,et al.  Is life cycle assessment (LCA) a suitable method for quantitative CO2 saving estimations? the impact of field input on the LCA results for a pure vegetable oil chain , 2010 .

[11]  A. Pizzigallo,et al.  The joint use of LCA and emergy evaluation for the analysis of two Italian wine farms. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[13]  Christian Bockstaller,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of eight pesticide environmental risk indicators developed in Europe and recommendations for future use , 2002 .

[14]  Anna Irene De Luca,et al.  Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Vine-Growing Combining Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Costing and Multicriterial Analysis , 2016 .

[15]  Bruno Notarnicola,et al.  Life cycle assessment application in the fruit sector: State of the art and recommendations for environmental declarations of fruit products , 2014 .

[16]  Gerard Kiely,et al.  Nitrous Oxide Emission from Grazed Grassland Under Different Management Systems , 2011, Ecosystems.

[17]  Merete Halkjær Olesen,et al.  Collection and evaluation of relevant information on crop interception , 2013 .

[18]  Emanuele Bonamente,et al.  Environmental impact of an Italian wine bottle: Carbon and water footprint assessment. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.