360-Degree Scheimpflug Imaging to Predict Allograft Rejection After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose: To describe the use of 360-degree Scheimpflug imaging as a diagnostic tool for detection and documentation of subtle corneal changes preceding upcoming allograft rejection after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Methods: A total of 17 eyes (16 patients) were diagnosed with clinically manifest allograft rejection 2 to 42 months after DMEK. 360-degree Scheimpflug images of consecutive follow-up examinations (from 3–60 mo) of “asymptomatic” eyes before, during, and after rejection were retrospectively analyzed, to determine which abnormalities could be detected before allograft rejection became clinically manifest. The images were compared with DMEK control eyes (without rejection episode). Results: Scheimpflug images at the time of rejection showed keratic precipitates as distinct retrocorneal nodular elevations and/or a significant increase in pachymetry of ≥7%. More subtle changes could be identified retrospectively in 9/17 eyes (53%) on an average at 8 (±5) months before rejection became clinically manifest; in all eyes, these subtle changes were not recognized at routine slit-lamp examinations by various ophthalmologists as inflammatory changes heralding allograft rejection. Secondary graft failure occurred in 4/17 eyes (24%). None of the control eyes showed relevant abnormalities with Scheimpflug imaging. Conclusions: By screening the posterior corneal surface with 360-degree Scheimpflug imaging, subtle inflammatory retrocorneal deposits can be detected and recorded during consecutive follow-up visits. Hence, Scheimpflug imaging may have the potential to become a diagnostic tool for early detection of upcoming allograft rejection in asymptomatic DMEK eyes, that is, before the immune response becomes clinically manifest and before substantial endothelial cell damage occurs.

[1]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Risk of Immunologic Rejection Episodes after Discontinuing Topical Corticosteroids. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[2]  I. Dapena,et al.  Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[3]  Silke Oellerich,et al.  Endothelial cell changes as an indicator for upcoming allograft rejection following descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  Evidence of Donor Corneal Endothelial Cell Migration From Immune Reactions Occurring After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2014, Cornea.

[5]  P. Hamrah,et al.  Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics , 2013, Journal of clinical & cellular immunology.

[6]  E. G. Groeneveld-van Beek,et al.  Standardized ‘no‐touch’ donor tissue preparation for DALK and DMEK: harvesting undamaged anterior and posterior transplants from the same donor cornea , 2013, Acta ophthalmologica.

[7]  S. Natarajan,et al.  Graft Rejection following descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: features, risk factors, and outcomes. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[9]  M. Terry,et al.  Graft rejection after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: graft survival and endothelial cell loss. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[10]  I. Dapena,et al.  Incidence of Early Allograft Rejection After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[11]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  D. Ponzin,et al.  Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2010, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  M. Claesson,et al.  Ten-Year Follow-up of Graft Survival and Visual Outcome After Penetrating Keratoplasty in Sweden , 2009, Cornea.

[14]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Descemet ’ s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty : Safety and Outcomes , 2022 .

[15]  C. Jordan,et al.  Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part one: clinical signs and symptoms , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  C. Jordan,et al.  Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Corneal Transplant Rejection Rate and Severity After Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2007, Cornea.

[18]  D. De Bacquer,et al.  Factors influencing the decline in endothelial cell density after corneal allograft rejection. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[20]  B. Seitz,et al.  Risk factors for corneal allograft rejection: intermediate results of a prospective normal-risk keratoplasty study , 2002, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.