Sequence-specific solvent accessibilities of protein residues in unfolded protein ensembles.

Protein stability cannot be understood without the correct description of the unfolded state. We present here an efficient method for accurate calculation of atomic solvent exposures for denatured protein ensembles. The method used to generate the ensembles has been shown to reproduce diverse biophysical experimental data corresponding to natively and chemically unfolded proteins. Using a data set of 19 nonhomologous proteins containing from 98 to 579 residues, we report average accessibilities for all residue types. These averaged accessibilities are considerably lower than those previously reported for tripeptides and close to the lower limit reported by Creamer and co-workers. Of importance, we observe remarkable sequence dependence for the exposure to solvent of all residue types, which indicates that average residue solvent exposures can be inappropriate to interpret mutational studies. In addition, we observe smaller influences of both protein size and protein amino acid composition in the averaged residue solvent exposures for individual proteins. Calculating residue-specific solvent accessibilities within the context of real sequences is thus necessary and feasible. The approach presented here may allow a more precise parameterization of protein energetics as a function of polar- and apolar-area burial and opens new ways to investigate the energetics of the unfolded state of proteins.

[1]  C. Dobson,et al.  Mapping long-range interactions in alpha-synuclein using spin-label NMR and ensemble molecular dynamics simulations. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  M. Karplus,et al.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  The Flory isolated-pair hypothesis is not valid for polypeptide chains: implications for protein folding. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Arto Annila,et al.  On the origin of residual dipolar couplings from denatured proteins. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Kang Chen,et al.  Conformation of the backbone in unfolded proteins. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[6]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  Foldon, the natural trimerization domain of T4 fibritin, dissociates into a monomeric A-state form containing a stable beta-hairpin: atomic details of trimer dissociation and local beta-hairpin stability from residual dipolar couplings. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  C. Pace,et al.  Hydrogen bonding stabilizes globular proteins. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Andrew D. Robertson,et al.  Protein Structure and the Energetics of Protein Stability. , 1997, Chemical reviews.

[9]  A. Shrake,et al.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  D. Shortle,et al.  Persistence of Native-Like Topology in a Denatured Protein in 8 M Urea , 2001, Science.

[11]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[12]  P. Y. Chou,et al.  Conformational parameters for amino acids in helical, beta-sheet, and random coil regions calculated from proteins. , 1974, Biochemistry.

[13]  A. Bax,et al.  Direct measurement of distances and angles in biomolecules by NMR in a dilute liquid crystalline medium. , 1997, Science.

[14]  A. Fersht,et al.  The folding of an enzyme. I. Theory of protein engineering analysis of stability and pathway of protein folding. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  W. Saenger,et al.  Residue solvent accessibilities in the unfolded polypeptide chain. , 1992, Biophysical journal.

[16]  H. Kono,et al.  Stability analysis for the cavity‐filling mutations of the Myb DNA‐binding domain utilizing free‐energy calculations , 2000, Proteins.

[17]  Eran Eyal,et al.  Importance of solvent accessibility and contact surfaces in modeling side‐chain conformations in proteins , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  M. Levitt A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  E. Freire Structural thermodynamics: prediction of protein stability and protein binding affinities. , 1993, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[20]  Gerard J A Kroon,et al.  Structural characterization of unfolded states of apomyoglobin using residual dipolar couplings. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  S Vajda,et al.  Discrimination of near‐native protein structures from misfolded models by empirical free energy functions , 2000, Proteins.

[22]  Pau Bernadó,et al.  A structural model for unfolded proteins from residual dipolar couplings and small-angle x-ray scattering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G. Rose,et al.  Hydrophobicity of amino acid residues in globular proteins. , 1985, Science.

[24]  Abhishek K. Jha,et al.  Statistical coil model of the unfolded state: resolving the reconciliation problem. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[26]  J. Sancho,et al.  A double-deletion method to quantifying incremental binding energies in proteins from experiment: example of a destabilizing hydrogen bonding pair. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[27]  C. Griesinger,et al.  Release of long-range tertiary interactions potentiates aggregation of natively unstructured alpha-synuclein. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  A M Lesk,et al.  Interior and surface of monomeric proteins. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  D. Goldenberg Computational simulation of the statistical properties of unfolded proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  G D Rose,et al.  Modeling unfolded states of peptides and proteins. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[31]  Hoang T. Tran,et al.  Reconciling observations of sequence-specific conformational propensities with the generic polymeric behavior of denatured proteins. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[32]  G. Rose,et al.  Reassessing random-coil statistics in unfolded proteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  J. Thornton,et al.  Influence of proline residues on protein conformation. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  D. Shortle,et al.  Characterization of long-range structure in the denatured state of staphylococcal nuclease. I. Paramagnetic relaxation enhancement by nitroxide spin labels. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Temperature dependence of the hydrophobic interaction in protein folding. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Determination of an ensemble of structures representing the denatured state of the bovine acyl-coenzyme a binding protein. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[38]  Yuji Sugita,et al.  How can free energy component analysis explain the difference in protein stability caused by amino acid substitutions? Effect of three hydrophobic mutations at the 56th residue on the stability of human lysozyme. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[39]  P. Privalov Stability of proteins: small globular proteins. , 1979, Advances in protein chemistry.

[40]  Andrew L. Lee,et al.  Direct Demonstration of Structural Similarity between Native and Denatured Eglin C † , 2004 .

[41]  M. Blackledge,et al.  Defining long-range order and local disorder in native alpha-synuclein using residual dipolar couplings. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[42]  G. Rose,et al.  Modeling unfolded states of proteins and peptides. II. Backbone solvent accessibility. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[43]  S Doniach,et al.  Changes in biomolecular conformation seen by small angle X-ray scattering. , 2001, Chemical reviews.

[44]  K. Dill Dominant forces in protein folding. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[45]  W. Kauzmann Some factors in the interpretation of protein denaturation. , 1959, Advances in protein chemistry.

[46]  Robin S. Dothager,et al.  Random-coil behavior and the dimensions of chemically unfolded proteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  C. Chothia Structural invariants in protein folding , 1975, Nature.

[48]  D. Shortle The denatured state (the other half of the folding equation) and its role in protein stability , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[49]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Thermodynamics of protein folding: a microscopic view. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.