Automated modal parameter-based anomaly detection under varying wind excitation

Wind-induced operational variability is one of the major challenges for structural health monitoring of slender engineering structures like aircraft wings or wind turbine blades. Damage sensitive features often show an even bigger sensitivity to operational variability. In this study a composite cantilever was subjected to multiple mass configurations, velocities and angles of attack in a controlled wind tunnel environment. A small-scale impact damage was introduced to the specimen and the structural response measurements were repeated. The proposed damage detection methodology is based on automated operational modal analysis. A novel baseline preparation procedure is described that reduces the amount of user interaction to the provision of a single consistency threshold. The procedure starts with an indeterminate number of operational modal analysis identifications from a large number of datasets and returns a complete baseline matrix of natural frequencies and damping ratios that is suitable for subsequent anomaly detection. Mahalanobis distance-based anomaly detection is then applied to successfully detect the damage under varying severities of operational variability and with various degrees of knowledge about the present operational conditions. The damage detection capabilities of the proposed methodology were found to be excellent under varying velocities and angles of attack. Damage detection was less successful under joint mass and wind variability but could be significantly improved through the provision of the currently encountered operational conditions.

[1]  Álvaro Cunha,et al.  Structural health monitoring of a stress-ribbon footbridge , 2013 .

[2]  R. B. Testa,et al.  Modal Analysis for Damage Detection in Structures , 1991 .

[3]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  Samit Ray-Chaudhuri,et al.  Fundamental mode shape and its derivatives in structural damage localization , 2013 .

[5]  Victoria J. Hodge,et al.  A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[6]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Online automatic identification of the modal parameters of a long span arch bridge , 2009 .

[7]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[8]  A. M. R. Ribeiro,et al.  A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials , 2006 .

[9]  Babak Moaveni,et al.  Environmental effects on the identified natural frequencies of the Dowling Hall Footbridge , 2011 .

[10]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Vibration based Structural Health Monitoring using output-only measurements under changing environment , 2008 .

[11]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[12]  C. Braun,et al.  Operational Modal Analysis of a wing excited by transonic flow , 2016 .

[13]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Review of Structural Health Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature 1996-2001. , 2002 .

[14]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Development and validation of an automated operational modal analysis algorithm for vibration-based monitoring and tensile load estimation , 2015 .

[15]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[16]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads , 2007 .

[17]  Keith Worden,et al.  Features for damage detection with insensitivity to environmental and operational variations , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Earl H. Dowell,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Study on Aeroelastic Response of High-Aspect-Ratio Wings , 2001 .

[19]  G. Jelicic,et al.  Automatic Operational Modal Analysis for Aeroelastic Applications , 2015 .

[20]  D. Cox,et al.  An Analysis of Transformations , 1964 .

[21]  Carlo Rainieri,et al.  Near real-time tracking of dynamic properties for standalone structural health monitoring systems , 2011 .

[22]  Patrick Guillaume,et al.  Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines using automated operational modal analysis , 2014 .

[23]  Arnaud Deraemaeker,et al.  On the use of the Mahalanobis squared-distance to filter out environmental effects in structural health monitoring , 2014 .

[24]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Support vector domain description , 1999, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[25]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Fully automated (operational) modal analysis , 2012 .

[26]  Filipe Magalhães,et al.  Vibration based structural health monitoring of an arch bridge: From automated OMA to damage detection , 2012 .

[27]  Edwin Reynders,et al.  Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification , 2014 .

[28]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  One-year monitoring of the Z24-Bridge : environmental effects versus damage events , 2001 .

[29]  Jean-Jacques Sinou,et al.  A review of damage detection and health monitoring of mechanical systems from changes in the measurement of linear and non-linear vibrations , 2009 .

[30]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability , 2011 .

[31]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective , 2012 .

[32]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .