Phase errors in diffraction-limited imaging: contrast limits for sparse aperture masking

Bispectrum phase, closure phase and their generalisation to kernel-phase are all independent of pupil-plane phase errors to first-order. This property, when used with Sparse Aperture Masking (SAM) behind adaptive optics, has been used recently in high-contrast observations at or inside the formal diffraction limit of large telescopes. Finding the limitations to these techniques requires an understanding of spatial and temporal third-order phase effects, as well as effects such as time-variable dispersion when coupled with the non-zero bandwidths in real observations. In this paper, formulae describing many of these errors are developed, so that a comparison can be made to fundamental noise processes of photon- and background-noise. I show that the current generation of aperture-masking observations of young solar-type stars, taken carefully in excellent observing conditions, are consistent with being limited by temporal phase noise and photon noise. This has relevance for plans to combine pupil-remapping with spatial filtering. Finally, I describe calibration strategies for kernel-phase, including the optimised calibrator weighting as used for LkCa 15, and the restricted kernel-phase POISE technique that avoids explicit dependence on calibrators.

[1]  C. A. Haniff,et al.  Closure phase in high-resolution optical imaging , 1986, Nature.

[2]  P. Tuthill,et al.  Michelson Interferometry with the Keck I Telescope , 2000 .

[3]  Olivier Absil,et al.  On the sensitivity of closure phases to faint companions in optical long baseline interferometry , 2012, 1204.3721.

[5]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  KERNEL PHASE IN FIZEAU INTERFEROMETRY , 2010 .

[6]  J. G. Robertson,et al.  Starlight demonstration of the Dragonfly instrument: an integrated photonic pupil-remapping interferometer for high-contrast imaging , 2012, 1210.0603.

[7]  A. Lagrange,et al.  Sparse aperture masking at the VLT. I. Faint companion detection limits for the two debris disk stars HD 92945 and HD 141569 , 2011, 1107.1426.

[8]  Albert A. Michelson,et al.  Measurement of Jupiter's Satellites by Interference , 1891, Nature.

[9]  Michael J. Ireland,et al.  OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON COMPANIONS INSIDE OF 10 AU IN THE HR 8799 PLANETARY SYSTEM , 2011 .

[10]  R. Narayan,et al.  Maximum Entropy Image Restoration in Astronomy , 1986 .

[11]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  Direct detection of the brown dwarf GJ 802B with adaptive optics masking interferometry , 2006 .

[12]  Etienne Artigau,et al.  A New Algorithm for Point-Spread Function Subtraction in High-Contrast Imaging: A Demonstration with Angular Differential Imaging , 2007, astro-ph/0702697.

[13]  M. Ireland,et al.  LkCa 15: A YOUNG EXOPLANET CAUGHT AT FORMATION? , 2011, 1110.3808.

[14]  Michael J. Ireland,et al.  KECK LASER GUIDE STAR ADAPTIVE OPTICS MONITORING OF THE M8+L7 BINARY LHS 2397aAB: FIRST DYNAMICAL MASS BENCHMARK AT THE L/T TRANSITION , 2009, 0904.2573.

[15]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  Mapping the Shores of the Brown Dwarf Desert. I. Upper Scorpius , 2008 .

[16]  K. J. Burns,et al.  FIRST, a fibered aperture masking instrument I. First on-sky test results , 2012, 1203.5075.

[17]  R. Soummer,et al.  DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF EXOPLANETS AND DISKS USING PROJECTIONS ON KARHUNEN–LOÈVE EIGENIMAGES , 2012, 1207.4197.

[18]  Shrinivas R. Kulkarni,et al.  Self-noise in interferometers - radio and infrared , 1989 .

[19]  Frantz Martinache,et al.  MAPPING THE SHORES OF THE BROWN DWARF DESERT. III. YOUNG MOVING GROUPS , 2011, 1109.5900.