An Overview of Testing Procedures and Approaches for Identifying Endocrine Disrupting Substances

Concern over the potential effects of exposure to endocrine disrupting substances (EDS) has resulted in recommendations for the development of specific endocrine and reproductive tests for assessment and regulation of industrial chemicals and effluents. This document consolidates and summarizes the current approaches taken by international agencies and scientific organizations for testing and screening EDS in mammals and wildlife. The material has been gathered from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development meeting reports, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Endocrine Disruptor Screening and Testing Advisory Committee and Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program reports, and summaries of various meetings prepared by Canadian and U.S. representatives. There are commonalties between programs of individual countries and the international scientific groups in which they participate. In general, these international scientific organizations have envisioned tiered groups of tests. The first tier is composed of less complex tests and short-term assays (acute exposures) that are very responsive to EDS (and have a low ‘false-negative’ rate). Higher tiers contain longer tests encompassing partial and full lifecycles of organisms with assessment of functional reproductive and developmental endpoints. Compounds are less expensively screened in the first tier, and move on to more complex and expensive higher-tier tests only if necessary. We document the proposed EDS tests in mammals and wildlife (birds, fish, amphibians and invertebrates) and overview the European Union’s approach to EDS research, monitoring and risk assessment. We conclude with a summary of the main recommendations from Canada’s interagency workshop to develop priorities and proposed actions for EDS.

[1]  Rosalind,et al.  Research needs for the risk assessment of health and environmental effects of endocrine disruptors: a report of the U.S. EPA-sponsored workshop. , 1996, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  Gordon S. Blair,et al.  Overview of the Workshop , 1993, NOSSDAV.

[3]  A. Lucas The Canadian Environmental Protection Act , 1987 .

[4]  Nancy D. Denslow,et al.  Overview of a workshop on screening methods for detecting potential (anti‐) estrogenic/androgenic chemicals in wildlife , 1998 .

[5]  L. Folmar,et al.  Development of a Research Strategy for Assessing the Ecological Risk of Endocrine Disruptors , 1997 .

[6]  R. Tyl,et al.  Endocrine Screening Methods Workshop report: detection of estrogenic and androgenic hormonal and antihormonal activity for chemicals that act via receptor or steroidogenic enzyme mechanisms. , 1997, Reproductive toxicology.

[7]  FROM THE COMMISSION on the precautionary principle , 2022 .

[8]  T. Iguchi Hormonal Chaos: The Scientific and Social Origins of the Environmental Endocrine Hypothesis , 2000, Nature Medicine.

[9]  Dianne Dumanoski,et al.  Our Stolen Future , 1996 .

[10]  R. K. Meyer,et al.  Myotrophic Activity of 19-Nortestosterone and Other Steroids Determined by Modified Levator Ani Muscle Method.∗ , 1953, Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine.

[11]  M. Servos,et al.  A Canadian Perspective on Endocrine Disrupting Substances in the Environment , 2001 .