This paper considers pedagogical implications of Vygotsky's project expansively reconstructed on the grounds of the notion that collaborative purposeful transformation of the world is the principled grounding for teaching–learning and development. Using a transformative ontology of continuous historical Becoming through answerable deeds in which cultural tools are seen as omnipresent, I argue that knowing and learning are rendered meaningful through their embedding as tools in identity development that represents an activist project of forming and carrying out purposeful life agenda aimed at contributing to social practices. Therefore, teaching–learning needs to integrate knowledge revealed: (a) as stemming out of social practice – as its constituent tools; (b) through social practice – where students need to rediscover these tools through their own active pursuit, efforts and inquiry; and (c) for social practice – where knowledge and ‘facts’ are rendered meaningful in light of their possible use in activities significant to students, that is, engendered by and engendering their identities.
[1]
A. Stetsenko,et al.
From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) project
,
2008
.
[2]
A. Stetsenko,et al.
Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity
,
2005
.
[3]
J. Shea.
National Science Education Standards
,
1995
.
[4]
Ann L. Brown,et al.
How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.
,
1999
.
[5]
J. Gibson.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
,
1979
.
[6]
A. Stetsenko,et al.
The Self in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory
,
2004
.
[7]
I. Arievitch,et al.
A Potential for an Integrated View of Development and Learning: Galperin's Contribution to Sociocultural Psychology
,
2003
.