Defects data and design optimization of gating system are a great challenge in casting. Most significant factors contributing to the volumetric changes and defects are pouring temperature, time, filling pattern, gating system, and casting geometry. The optimized design of gating system facilitates the smooth filling of the mold without air entrapment, material flow hindrance. Conventionally, the foundry method includes design calculations, best practices, and the tedious hit-and-trial method to get the optimum design of pattern/mold for defect-free casting. The design iterations and improvements directly affect the development cost and time, and one of the great challenges of the foundry method is to reduce this time and cost. The numerical simulation techniques embedded in casting simulation software are a powerful tool to overcome these challenges. It predicts the factors such as filling pressure, velocity, cooling rate, hot spots, and inside porosity. This article describes the design, simulation, experimental results, and design improvements for the complex geometries in the sand casting process. Impeller is selected as test case. The gating system was initially designed by using the text book mathematical relations and best practices recommendations. To study the predicted results of effected parameters, MAGMASOFT Software was used as a simulation tool. Three design modifications of mold design were studied. The effect of design including location and size of risers, gates on parameters such as filling pattern, pressure and velocity, cooling rate, solidification and defects such as air entrapment, hot spot, and porosity were studied. The predicted results were then compared with experimental data, and an excellent agreement between them was reported. The article highlighted the effectiveness of simulation to reach an optimal design of mold by passing the costly hit-and-trial conventional practice in the foundry industry and shows the effectiveness of simulations in time compression of casting pattern/development.
[1]
Steven R Schmid Kalpakjian,et al.
Manufacturing Engineering and Technology
,
1991
.
[2]
Chen Kang.
Application of the software ProCAST in the casting of solidification simulation
,
2006
.
[3]
A. Rajadurai,et al.
Simulation of casting solidification and its grain structure prediction using FEM
,
2005
.
[4]
M. Jolly,et al.
A multiple-gate runner system for gravity casting
,
2009
.
[5]
M.S. Kulkarni,et al.
Optimization of Continuous Casting Using Simulation
,
2005
.
[6]
D. R. Gunasegaram,et al.
Identification of critical factors affecting shrinkage porosity in permanent mold casting using numerical simulations based on design of experiments
,
2009
.
[7]
H. Fu,et al.
Application of numerical simulation technique to casting process of valve block
,
2009
.
[8]
S. Seifeddine,et al.
Prediction of mechanical properties of cast aluminium components at various iron contents
,
2010
.
[9]
William Pao,et al.
Alternative techniques for casting process simulation
,
2004
.
[10]
D. Ferguson,et al.
A look at physical simulation of metallurgical processes, past, present and future
,
2009
.
[11]
N. Jawahar,et al.
Process factor optimization for controlling pull-down defects in iron castings
,
2009
.
[12]
Luoxing Li,et al.
Simulation Study on the LPDC Process for Thin-Walled Aluminum Alloy Casting
,
2009
.