Applying clinical guidelines in general practice: a qualitative study of potential complications

BackgroundClinical guidelines for single diseases often pose problems in general practice work with multimorbid patients. However, little research focuses on how general practice is affected by the demand to follow multiple guidelines. This study explored Norwegian general practitioners’ (GPs’) experiences with and reflections upon the consequences for general practice of applying multiple guidelines.MethodsQualitative focus group study carried out in Mid-Norway. The study involved a purposeful sample of 25 Norwegian GPs from four pre-existing groups. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and analyzed using systematic text condensation, i.e. applying a phenomenological approach.ResultsThe GPs’ responses clustered around two major topics: 1) Complications for the GPs of applying multiple guidelines; and, 2) Complications for their patients when GPs apply multiple guidelines. For the GPs, applying multiple guidelines created a highly problematic situation as they felt obliged to implement guidelines that were not suited to their patients: too often, the map and the terrain did not match. They also experienced greater insecurity regarding their own practice which, they admitted, resulted in an increased tendency to practice ‘defensive medicine’. For their patients, the GPs experienced that applying multiple guidelines increased the risk of polypharmacy, excessive non-pharmacological recommendations, a tendency toward medicalization and, for some, a reduction in quality of life.ConclusionsThe GPs experienced negative consequences when obliged to apply a variety of single disease guidelines to multimorbid patients, including increased risk of polypharmacy and overtreatment. We believe patient-centered care and the GPs’ courage to non-comply when necessary may aid in reducing these risks. Health care authorities and guideline developers need to be aware of the potential negative effects of applying a single disease focus in general practice, where multimorbidity is highly prevalent.

[1]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Jan Heyrman,et al.  THE EUROPEAN DEFINITION OF GENERAL PRACTICE / FAMILY MEDICINE , 2002 .

[3]  H. van den Bussche,et al.  Epidemiological strategies for adapting clinical practice guidelines to the needs of multimorbid patients , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[4]  S. Hill,et al.  Expanding Disease Definitions in Guidelines and Expert Panel Ties to Industry: A Cross-sectional Study of Common Conditions in the United States , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[5]  S. Sofaer.  Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? , 1999, Health services research.

[6]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  S. Yardley,et al.  Lived experiences of multimorbidity: An interpretative meta-synthesis of patients’, general practitioners’ and trainees’ perceptions , 2015, Chronic illness.

[8]  R. Payne,et al.  Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care. , 2014, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[9]  J. Sleath.  In pursuit of normoglycaemia: the overtreatment of type 2 diabetes in general practice. , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Drug-disease and drug-drug interactions: systematic examination of recommendations in 12 UK national clinical guidelines , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  L. Getz,et al.  Current European guidelines for management of arterial hypertension: Are they adequate for use in primary care? Modelling study based on the Norwegian HUNT 2 population , 2009, BMC family practice.

[12]  Ray Moynihan,et al.  Using Evidence to Combat Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Evaluating Treatments, Tests, and Disease Definitions in the Time of Too Much , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[13]  S. Mercer,et al.  Challenges of managing people with multimorbidity in today’s healthcare systems , 2015, BMC Family Practice.

[14]  S. Krokstad,et al.  Co- and multimorbidity patterns in an unselected Norwegian population: cross-sectional analysis based on the HUNT Study and theoretical reflections concerning basic medical models , 2014 .

[15]  S. Wyke,et al.  Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study , 2012, The Lancet.

[16]  A. Helvik,et al.  General practitioners' experiences with multiple clinical guidelines: A qualitative study from Norway , 2015 .

[17]  David L. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't (reprinted from BMJ, vol 312, pg 71-72, 1996) , 2007 .

[18]  L. Borgquist,et al.  Problems and challenges in relation to the treatment of patients with multimorbidity: General practitioners’ views and attitudes* , 2015, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[19]  B. Starfield,et al.  Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. , 2005, The Milbank quarterly.

[20]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Margaret McCartney: Have we given guidelines too much power? , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  S. Kvale.  The Qualitative Research Interview , 1983 .

[23]  M. Sandelowski.  Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[24]  M. Agar.  Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative , 1988 .

[25]  Uta Boehm,et al.  Advanced Focus Group Research , 2016 .

[26]  A. Wu,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. , 2005, JAMA.

[27]  A. J. Vetlesen.  Perception, Empathy, and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance , 1993 .

[28]  A. Schroeder,et al.  Doing More vs. Doing Good: Aligning Our Ethical Principles From the Personal to the Societal. , 2015, JAMA pediatrics.

[29]  G. Westert,et al.  General practitioners' preferences for interventions to improve guideline adherence. , 2014, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[30]  W. Rogers,et al.  The challenge of overdiagnosis begins with its definition , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  P. Bower,et al.  Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[32]  James Woodcock,et al.  A Framework for Crafting Clinical Practice Guidelines that are Relevant to the Care and Management of People with Multimorbidity , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[33]  K. Malterud.  Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis , 2012, Scandinavian journal of public health.

[34]  R. Witzburg.  Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology , 1999 .

[35]  L. Getz,et al.  [General practitioners who do not follow practice guidelines--may they have reasons not to?]. , 2008, Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening.

[36]  Anders Grimsmo,et al.  Development of a patient-centred care pathway across healthcare providers: a qualitative study , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[37]  G. Casadei,et al.  Continuing Medical Education in six European countries: a comparative analysis. , 2010, Health policy.

[38]  A. Giorgi,et al.  A Qualitative Effort to Describe Experience Scientifically Review ofThe descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach , 2009, History & Philosophy of Psychology.

[39]  N. Steel,et al.  A review of clinical practice guidelines found that they were often based on evidence of uncertain relevance to primary care patients☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[40]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Guidelines for people not for diseases: the challenges of applying UK clinical guidelines to people with multimorbidity. , 2013, Age and ageing.

[41]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[42]  J. Bensing,et al.  Bridging the gap. The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. , 2000, Patient education and counseling.

[43]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. , 2015, JAMA internal medicine.

[44]  Judith Smith,et al.  The effect of L-dopa on the potentiation of radiation damage to human melanoma cells. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[45]  L. Getz,et al.  Medicine's perception of reality - a split picture: critical reflections on apparent anomalies within the biomedical theory of science. , 2016, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[46]  K. Chalkidou.  About the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence - NICE. , 2013, Acta medica portuguesa.

[47]  C. Bradley,et al.  What to give the patient who has everything? A qualitative study of prescribing for multimorbidity in primary care. , 2015, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.