The construction of meaning in design-driven projects: a paradox initiated process

ABSTRACT In a world of ever-increasing products and services, companies are forced to think differently and find new approaches to bring meaningful and differentiating products to the market. In many cases, they have to go beyond the functional features in order to win the customers’ hearts and attention. Design-driven innovation is acknowledged as a way to create new meaningful experiences to the users – not driven by market demands or technology development but by experience and the emotional parameters of the solution-to-be. Despite an increasing interest in design-driven innovation, the process of how new meanings are constructed is still a neglected area in existing design research. This paper explores how five Danish companies in diverse industries constructed new product meanings. The study indicates that 1) innovation of meaning starts from a paradox in an existing product-user relationship – often experienced by the designer 2) the central point for meanings’ construction is the user’s experience of the product, and 3) meaning is constructed in respect to a number of different product aspects including e.g. experience, interaction and expression.

[1]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[2]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean , 2009 .

[3]  P. Desmet,et al.  Framework of product experience , 2007 .

[4]  Elzbieta T. Kazmierczak.  Design as Meaning Making: From Making Things to the Design of Thinking , 2003, Design Issues.

[5]  R. Verganti.  Design as brokering of languages: Innovation strategies in Italian firms , 2010 .

[6]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Design-Driven Laboratories: Organization and Strategy of Laboratories Specialized in the Development of Radical Design-Driven Innovations , 2009 .

[7]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[8]  Marianne W. Lewis.  Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide , 2000 .

[9]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[10]  Mairi Maclean,et al.  Mobilising differential visions for new product innovation , 2012 .

[11]  Richard Buchanan,et al.  Wicked Problems in Design Thinking , 1992 .

[12]  Åsa Öberg.  Striving for meaning - a study of innovation processes , 2015 .

[13]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[14]  Paul Hekkert,et al.  Vision in Design: A Guidebook for Innovators , 2011 .

[15]  Nathan Crilly,et al.  Do Users Know What Designers Are Up To? Product Experience and the Inference of Persuasive Intentions , 2011 .

[16]  D. Norman.  Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[17]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[18]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Design Problems and Design Paradoxes , 2006, Design Issues.

[19]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Strategies of Innovation and Imitation of Product Languages , 2007 .

[20]  L. Argote,et al.  Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration , 2011 .

[21]  Sara L. Beckman,et al.  Framing Innovation: Negotiating Shared Frames During Early Design Phases , 2007 .

[22]  Lucia Rampino,et al.  The Innovation Pyramid: A Categorization of the Innovation Phenomenon in the Product-design Field , 2011 .

[23]  A. Shani,et al.  Vision transformation through radical circles: Enhancing innovation capability development☆ , 2016 .

[24]  Jonas Magnusson,et al.  Designing Innovation of Meanings – A Competitive Advantage , 2011 .

[25]  R. Verganti.  Overcrowded: Designing Meaningful Products in a World Awash with Ideas , 2017 .

[26]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[27]  Judith Hills,et al.  The semantic turn: A new foundation for design , 2008 .

[28]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Design as brokering of languages. The role of designers in the innovation strategy of Italian firms , 2003 .

[30]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Collaborative Strategies in Design-intensive Industries: Knowledge Diversity and Innovation , 2010 .

[31]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[32]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  The Three Paradigms of HCI , 2007 .

[33]  C. H. Dorst,et al.  Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design , 2015 .

[34]  Marcel Urner,et al.  Frame Reflection Toward The Resolution Of Intractable Policy Controversies , 2016 .