Combining observational techniques to constrain convection in evolved massive star models

Abstract Recent stellar evolution computations indicate that massive stars in the range ~ 20-30 M⊙ are located in the blue supergiant (BSG) region of the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram at two different stages of their life: immediately after the main sequence (MS, group 1) and during a blueward evolution after the red supergiant phase (group 2). From the observation of the pulsationnal properties of a subgroup of variable BSGs (α Cyg variables), one can deduce that these stars belongs to group 2. It is however difficult to simultaneously fit the observed surface abundances and gravity for these stars, and this allows to constrain the physical processes of chemical species transport in massive stars. We will show here that the surface abundances are extremely sensitive to the physics of convection, particularly the location of the intermediate convective shell that appears at the ignition of the hydrogen shell burning after the MS. Our results show that the use of the Ledoux criterion to determine the convective regions in the stellar models leads to a better fit of the surface abundances for α Cyg variables than the Schwarzschild one.

[1]  G. Meynet,et al.  The puzzle of the CNO abundances of α Cygni variables resolved by the Ledoux criterion , 2013, 1311.4744.

[2]  F. Martins,et al.  A comparison of evolutionary tracks for single Galactic massive stars , 2013, 1310.7218.

[3]  G. Meynet,et al.  Evolution of blue supergiants and α Cygni variables: puzzling CNO surface abundances , 2013, 1305.2474.

[4]  C. Meakin,et al.  TURBULENT CONVECTION IN STELLAR INTERIORS. III. MEAN-FIELD ANALYSIS AND STRATIFICATION EFFECTS , 2012, 1212.6365.

[5]  N. Przybilla,et al.  Quantitative spectroscopy of Galactic BA-type supergiants I. Atmospheric parameters , , 2012, 1207.0308.

[6]  P. Massey,et al.  Grids of stellar models with rotation - II. WR populations and supernovae/GRB progenitors at Z = 0.014 , 2012, 1203.5243.

[7]  E. Guinan,et al.  ASTEROSEISMOLOGY OF THE NEARBY SN-II PROGENITOR: RIGEL. I. THE MOST HIGH-PRECISION PHOTOMETRY AND RADIAL VELOCITY MONITORING , 2012, 1201.0843.

[8]  C. Georgy Yellow supergiants as supernova progenitors: an indication of strong mass loss for red supergiants? , 2011, 1111.7003.

[9]  N. Mowlavi,et al.  Grids of stellar models with rotation - I. Models from 0.8 to 120 M⊙ at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014) , 2011, 1110.5049.

[10]  S. Adelman,et al.  A FIVE-YEAR SPECTROSCOPIC AND PHOTOMETRIC CAMPAIGN ON THE PROTOTYPICAL α CYGNI VARIABLE AND A-TYPE SUPERGIANT STAR DENEB , 2010, 1009.5994.

[11]  G. Meynet,et al.  Mixing of CNO-cycled matter in massive stars , 2010, 1005.2278.

[12]  N. Kaltcheva,et al.  The Carina spiral feature: Strömgren-β photometry approach II. Distances and space distribution of the O and B stars , 2010 .

[13]  Universidad de Concepcion,et al.  Quantitative Spectroscopy of 24 A Supergiants in the Sculptor Galaxy NGC 300: Flux-weighted Gravity-Luminosity Relationship, Metallicity, and Metallicity Gradient , 2008, 0803.3654.

[14]  S. Adelman,et al.  Photometric Variability of the B8Iae Supergiant Variable HD 199478 (HR 8020) , 2008 .

[15]  J. Puls,et al.  Bright OB stars in the Galaxy - IV. Stellar and wind parameters of early to late B supergiants , 2007, 0711.1110.

[16]  N. Przybilla,et al.  Quantitative Spectroscopy of Deneb , 2007, 0712.0040.

[17]  C. Meakin,et al.  Turbulent Convection in Stellar Interiors. I. Hydrodynamic Simulation , 2006, astro-ph/0611315.

[18]  R. Kudritzki,et al.  On the Photometric Variability of Blue Supergiants in NGC 300 and Its Impact on the Flux-weighted Gravity-Luminosity Relationship , 2003, astro-ph/0309336.

[19]  D. Vanbeveren,et al.  The WR and O-type star population predicted by massive star evolutionary synthesis , 1998 .

[20]  F. V. Leeuwen,et al.  HIPPARCOS photometry of 24 variable massive stars (alpha Cygni variables) , 1998 .