The changing decision patterns of the consumer in a decentralized smart grid

The well-regulated Swiss electricity market is subject to far-reaching transitions towards an intelligent network. These include a shift of responsibility, as the consumer comes to play an active role in electricity management. While previous research suggests that the consumer acts according to rational choice or non-cooperative game theory, this is not a sufficient justification for consumer decision-making in a socio-techno-logical environment. To this end, this empirical research elaborates on the decision-making patterns supported by the technological change. The findings suggest that to a certain extent, diffusion of decentralized generation and storage create new responsibilities for a micro trader apart from consumption. Central for trading is the “security of supply” value and any perceived gains and losses in the value outcome entails switching between risk-averse and risk-seeking behavior.

[1]  Taylor Moore,et al.  Emerging Markets for Distributed Resources , 1998, Distributed Generation & Alternative Energy Journal.

[2]  Agence pour l'Energie Nucléaire.  Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2005 , 2005 .

[3]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and personality, 3rd ed. , 1987 .

[4]  E. Dunlop,et al.  Potential of solar electricity generation in the European Union member states and candidate countries , 2007 .

[5]  Dieter Bohn.  Decentralised energy systems: state of the art and potentials , 2005 .

[6]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[7]  Daniel Pérez Palomar,et al.  Demand-Side Management via Distributed Energy Generation and Storage Optimization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Agent-based micro-storage management for the Smart Grid , 2010, AAMAS.

[9]  Horace Herring,et al.  Energy efficiency—a critical view , 2006 .

[10]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Demand side management: Benefits and challenges ☆ , 2008 .

[11]  F. Geels.  From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[12]  A. Maslow.  Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[13]  Vincent W. S. Wong,et al.  Autonomous Demand-Side Management Based on Game-Theoretic Energy Consumption Scheduling for the Future Smart Grid , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[14]  Stephan Koch,et al.  Provision of Load Frequency Control by PHEVs, Controllable Loads, and a Cogeneration Unit , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[15]  D. Kahneman.  Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[16]  H. Rui,et al.  Synthetic medium voltage grids for the assessment of Smart Grid techniques , 2012, 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe).

[17]  John H. Holland,et al.  Studying Complex Adaptive Systems , 2006, J. Syst. Sci. Complex..

[18]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[19]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[20]  Stephanie,et al.  The Crowd Energy Concept , 2014 .

[21]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  The transformation of technological regimes , 2003 .

[22]  P. H. Baker,et al.  Regulatory frameworks for decentralised energy , 2008 .

[23]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  S. Mitter,et al.  Dynamic Pricing and Stabilization of Supply and Demand in Modern Electric Power Grids , 2010, 2010 First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications.