Integrating supply, flow and demand to enhance the understanding of interactions among multiple ecosystem services.

A comprehensive understanding of the relationships among ecosystem services (ES) is important for landscape management, decision-making and policy development, but interactions among multiple ES remain under-researched. In particular, earlier studies often did not clearly distinguish between supply, flow and demand. Furthermore, the underlying mechanisms in complex socio-ecological systems remain less examined. In this study, we therefore aimed to assess interactions among eight key ES, adopting a multistep approach. For all ES, we mapped ES supply, flow and demand at the municipality level in the Alpine Space area. We applied correlation analysis and cluster analysis in order to analyse the linkages between ES and to identify bundles of ES. We used random forest analysis to explain the distribution of the ES bundles and to identify important drivers based on socio-ecological variables (e.g. land use/cover, climate, topography and population density). Our results demonstrate that trade-offs and synergies varied greatly for supply, flow and demand. We identified five ES bundles, distinguishing hotspots of ES supply and demand. Twelve socio-ecological variables correctly predicted the membership of 81% of the municipalities to the ES bundles. Our results suggest that a limited number of socio-ecological variables can explain the majority of the distribution of ES bundles in the landscape. Considering the spatial relationships between mountain regions and their surrounding lowlands, regional and transnational governance frameworks need to connect areas of multiple ES supply to areas of ES demand, and should account for the different levels and types of ES relationships.

[1]  Martin Volk,et al.  Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales , 2013 .

[2]  Claudia Carvalho-Santos,et al.  Trade-offs and Synergies Between Provisioning and Regulating Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Area in Portugal Affected by Landscape Change , 2016, Mountain Research and Development.

[3]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning , 2017 .

[4]  F. Müller,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets , 2012 .

[5]  Albert V. Norström,et al.  Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services: what variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrström drainage basin? , 2016 .

[6]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region , 2016 .

[7]  Dirk R. Schmatz,et al.  Trade-Offs between Ecosystem Services in a Mountain Region , 2013 .

[8]  Ulrike Tappeiner,et al.  Mapping beneficiaries of ecosystem services flows from Natura 2000 sites , 2014 .

[9]  U. Tappeiner,et al.  Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: insights and open issues , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Willem Bouten,et al.  A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services , 2014 .

[11]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Ecological and Land Use Studies Along Elevational Gradients , 2007 .

[12]  Pisoni Enrico,et al.  Downscaling methodology to produce a high resolution gridded emission inventory to support local/city level air quality policies , 2017 .

[13]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[14]  Guy N. Brock,et al.  clValid , an R package for cluster validation , 2008 .

[15]  F. Müller,et al.  Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification , 2014 .

[16]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative , 2010 .

[17]  Adrienne Grêt-Regamey,et al.  Mountain Ecosystem Services: Who Cares? , 2012 .

[18]  Jacqueline Loos,et al.  Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability , 2017 .

[19]  U. Tappeiner,et al.  Future impacts of changing land-use and climate on ecosystem services of mountain grassland and their resilience , 2017, Ecosystem services.

[20]  Claude Meisch,et al.  Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings , 2017, Ecosystem Services.

[21]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Bundles of ecosystem (dis)services and multifunctionality across European landscapes. , 2017 .

[22]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[23]  S. Lautenbach,et al.  A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services , 2014, bioRxiv.

[24]  G. Dematteis Polycentric urban regions in the Alpine space , 2009 .

[25]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria , 2007 .

[26]  Georg Kindermann,et al.  Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes - The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies , 2015 .

[27]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  The Bagplot: A Bivariate Boxplot , 1999 .

[28]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services , 2006 .

[29]  Francis Turkelboom,et al.  Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps , 2015 .

[30]  U. Walz,et al.  Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: Providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics , 2012 .

[31]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape , 2014 .

[32]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[33]  Georgina M. Mace,et al.  Creating win-wins from trade-offs? Ecosystem services for human well-being: A meta-analysis of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies in the real world , 2014 .

[34]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  Linking ecosystem services with landscape history , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  V. Bell,et al.  The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  I. Guyon,et al.  Detecting stable clusters using principal component analysis. , 2003, Methods in molecular biology.

[37]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Unpacking ecosystem service bundles : Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services , 2017 .

[38]  Karin Frank,et al.  Interregional flows of ecosystem services: Concepts, typology and four cases , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[39]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape , 2015, AMBIO.

[40]  U. Tappeiner,et al.  Linking long-term landscape dynamics to the multiple interactions among ecosystem services in the European Alps , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  T. D. Mitchell,et al.  Ecosystem Service Supply and Vulnerability to Global Change in Europe , 2005, Science.

[42]  E. Bennett,et al.  Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery , 2013 .

[43]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[45]  P. Verburg,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives , 2015 .

[46]  Juergen Kreyling,et al.  Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns , 2015 .

[47]  Koukal Tatjana,et al.  Development of Harmonized Indicators and Estimation Procedures for Forests with Protective Functions against Natural Hazards in the Alpine Space , 2010 .

[48]  R. Marston Land, Life, and Environmental Change in Mountains , 2008 .

[49]  Berta Martín-López,et al.  An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services , 2014 .

[50]  Robert Huber,et al.  Future of Mountain Agriculture in the Alps , 2013 .

[51]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  Roy Haines-Young,et al.  National Parks, buffer zones and surrounding lands: Mapping ecosystem service flows , 2013 .

[53]  Martin Volk,et al.  Towards systematic analyses of ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies : Main concepts, methods and the road ahead , 2017 .

[54]  A. Prasad,et al.  Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction , 2006, Ecosystems.

[55]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  On the Effects of Scale for Ecosystem Services Mapping , 2014, PloS one.

[56]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  K. Chan,et al.  Human impacts and ecosystem services: Insufficient research for trade-off evaluation , 2015 .

[58]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Dissimilarity Plots: A Visual Exploration Tool for Partitional Clustering , 2011 .

[59]  U. Tappeiner,et al.  Using land use/land cover trajectories to uncover ecosystem service patterns across the Alps , 2017, Regional Environmental Change.

[60]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Characteristic trajectories of ecosystem services in mountains , 2017 .

[61]  R. Biggs,et al.  Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use , 2015 .

[62]  Claire Brown,et al.  National Ecosystem Assessments in Europe: A Review , 2016, Bioscience.