Using quality of life measures in the clinical setting

This is the second in a series of five articles In modern medicine the traditional way of assessing change in patients has been to focus on laboratory or clinical tests. At its most simple this involves measuring pulse, blood pressure, and temperature, and carrying out physical examinations. At more complex levels it may include haematological analysis, computed tomography, radiography, organ function tests, genetic analysis, and other investigations. While these give important information about the disease, especially about chronic and progressive diseases, it is impossible to separate disease from an individual's personal and social context. No illness exists in a vacuum. One way of capturing the personal and social context of patients is to use quality of life measures.1 These are accepted as outcome measures in clinical research but are rarely used in routine clinical practice, despite the fact that Florence Nightingale was one of the first clinicians to insist on measuring the outcome of routine care to evaluate treatment.2 This article reviews the challenges of using quality of life measures in clinical practice including selecting appropriate measures, analysing data, providing feedback, interpreting results, and incorporating these measures into clinical decision making. Practical ways of resolving the tension between the need for approaches suitable in the clinical encounter and the highly individualised nature of quality of life are also examined. #### Summary points Using quality of life measures in clinical practice ensures that treatment and evaluations focus on the patient rather than the disease The measures are potentially useful in both the clinical encounter and in quality improvement They are not a substitute for measures of disease outcomes and may not always be the most appropriate patient centred outcome to assess Measures developed for research often cannot easily be used in clinical practice Measures that form an integral part of treatment planning …

[1]  L. Kalra,et al.  Who should measure quality of life? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  I. Higginson,et al.  Are quality of life measures patient centred? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  A. J. Carr,et al.  Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  R. Mannion,et al.  Organisational culture and quality of health care , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[5]  G. Thornicroft,et al.  Are routine outcome measures feasible in mental health? , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[6]  P. Maguire,et al.  Physical and psychological needs of patients dying from colo-rectal cancer , 1999, Palliative medicine.

[7]  I. Higginson,et al.  Outcome measures for routine use in dementia services: some practical considerations. , 1997, Quality in health care : QHC.

[8]  I. Higginson,et al.  Audit in palliative care: does practice change? , 1996, European journal of cancer care.

[9]  A. Carr,et al.  Margaret Holroyd Prize Essay. A patient-centred approach to evaluation and treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the development of a clinical tool to measure patient-perceived handicap. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[10]  C. Paterson Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey , 1996, BMJ.

[11]  F. Burge Outcomes into Clinical Practice , 1995 .

[12]  A. Garratt,et al.  A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient‐Generated Index , 1994, Medical care.

[13]  D. Osoba,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  H. Davies,et al.  Missing link in the audit cycle. , 1993, Quality in health care : QHC.

[15]  H. McGee,et al.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement , 1992, The Lancet.

[16]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Benefits and obstacles for development of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. , 1992, Medical care.

[17]  R A Deyo,et al.  Strategies for improving and expanding the application of health status measures in clinical settings. A researcher-developer viewpoint. , 1992, Medical care.

[18]  I. Higginson,et al.  Effectiveness of two palliative support teams. , 1992, Journal of public health medicine.

[19]  Eduardo Bruera,et al.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A Simple Method for the Assessment of Palliative Care Patients , 1991, Journal of palliative care.

[20]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[21]  L E Kazis,et al.  Health status reports in the care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1990, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  B. Mount,et al.  Whither hospice evaluation. , 1983, Journal of chronic diseases.

[23]  Teeling Smith,et al.  Measuring the Social Benefits of Medicine , 1983 .