Exploring dynamic multi-level linkages in inter-organizational networks

When an organization pursues the goals specific to its environment, networks are constructed to gain various resources from other collaborators. However, most individual studies on inter-organizational network have taken a simplified view of relationships among member organizations by focusing on a static and single level linkage. This paper proposes a multi-level approach to integrate resource, organization and network levels and explores the relationship between these levels. This enables us to identify a set of important micro, meso and macro linkages between resource, organization and network. Operational measures and results are illustrated via a case study from an incubator system of Xi'an High-tech Park of China. The case study demonstrates that one level triggers the changes of other levels.

[1]  J. McGuire,et al.  The persistence and implications of Japanese keiretsu organization , 2003 .

[2]  Toby E. Stuart.  Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[3]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[4]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[5]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[6]  R. Friedman,et al.  Differentiation of Boundary Spanning Roles: Labor Negotiations and Implications for Role Conflict , 1992 .

[7]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Joint Ventures and Interorganizational Interdependence , 1976 .

[8]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Alliances, External Technology Acquisition, and Discontinuous Technological Change , 1997 .

[9]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[11]  Nicholas Argyres.  EVIDENCE ON THE ROLE OF FIRM CAPABILITIES IN VERTICAL INTEGRATION DECISIONS , 1996 .

[12]  M. V. Valkenburg.  Network Analysis , 1964 .

[13]  Keith G. Provan,et al.  Networks within networks: Service link overlap, organizational cliques, and network effectiveness , 1998 .

[14]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[15]  Douglas E. Shook,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS OF JOB CATEGORIES AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEVELS TO USE OF COMMUNICATION CHANNELS, INCLUDING ELECTRONIC MAIL: A META-ANALYSIS AND EXTENSION* , 1990 .

[16]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[17]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  J. Hagedoorn.  Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Nterorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences , 1993 .

[19]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[20]  C. P. Rao,et al.  Choice of Foreign Market Entry Modes by Service Firms: Role of Market Knowledge , 1990 .

[21]  R. Gulati.  Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[22]  J. Hagedoorn.  Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960 , 2002 .

[23]  S. C. Johnson.  Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[24]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[26]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[27]  Birger Wernerfelt,et al.  The link between resources and type of diversification: Theory and evidence , 1991 .

[28]  N. Nohria,et al.  Global strategic linkages and industry structure , 1991 .

[29]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Size and relatedness of units sold: An agency theory and resource‐based perspective , 1995 .

[30]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[31]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[32]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  External Economies and Economic Progress: The Case of the Microcomputer Industry , 1992, Business History Review.

[33]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[34]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms , 2004 .

[35]  Emmanuel Lazega,et al.  Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: a case study , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[36]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures , 1999 .

[37]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[38]  B Kogut.  Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[39]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[41]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[42]  M. Feldman.  The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[43]  M. Santoro.  Success breeds success , 2000 .

[44]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[45]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[46]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[47]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis , 1988 .

[48]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[50]  B. Kogut.  Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[51]  Mark Rogers,et al.  Network density and R&D spillovers , 2004 .

[52]  R. Gulati.  Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[53]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Autonomy in a Social Topology , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[55]  Christina L. Ahmadjian,et al.  Keiretsu Networks and Corporate Performance in Japan , 1996 .

[56]  Mario Benassi,et al.  The Dark Side of Social Capital , 1999 .

[57]  E. Perotti,et al.  The governance structure of the Japanese financial keiretsu , 1994 .

[58]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[59]  David Knoke,et al.  How Organizational Field Networks Shape Interorganizational Tie-Formation Rates , 2002 .

[60]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Strategic alliances as social capital: a multidimensional view , 2002 .

[61]  Yoshiko Okubo,et al.  The changing pattern of industrial scientific research collaboration in Sweden , 2000 .

[62]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Customization or Conformity? An Institutional and Network Perspective on the Content and Consequences of TQM Adoption , 1997 .

[63]  Michael Useem,et al.  Classwide Rationality in the Politics of Managers and Directors of Large Corporations in the United States and Great Britain , 1982 .

[64]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[65]  William Richards,et al.  Nonrespondents in Communication Network Studies , 1992 .

[66]  G. Ahuja.  The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[67]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[68]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[69]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  FIRM SIZE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTRALITY IN INDUSTRY-UNIVERSITY INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[70]  H. Ibarra.  Race, Opportunity, And Diversity Of Social Circles In Managerial Networks , 1995 .

[71]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[72]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[73]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[74]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[75]  Margherita Russo,et al.  Technical change and the industrial district: The role of interfirm relations in the growth and transformation of ceramic tile production in Italy , 1985 .

[76]  D. R. White,et al.  Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups , 2003 .

[77]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[78]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[79]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  Networks in transition : How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships , 1998 .

[80]  Doris R. Ryan,et al.  A comparison of three algorithms for finding fundamental cycles in a directed graph , 1981, Networks.

[81]  B. Borys,et al.  Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations , 1989 .

[82]  J. Jarillo.  On strategic networks , 1988 .

[83]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .