How does context influence collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery and evaluation?

BackgroundCollaboration among researchers (clinician, non-clinician) and decision makers (managers, policy-makers, clinicians), referred to as integrated knowledge translation (IKT), enhances the relevance and use of research, leading to improved decision-making, policies, practice, and health care outcomes. However IKT is not widely practiced due to numerous challenges. This research explored how context influenced IKT as a means of identifying how IKT could be strengthened.MethodsThis research investigated IKT in three health services programs for colon cancer screening, prostate cancer diagnosis, and the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Qualitative methods were used to explore contextual factors that influenced how IKT occurred, and its impact. Data were collected between September 1, 2012 and May 15, 2013 from relevant documents, observation of meetings, and interviews with researchers and decision-makers, analyzed using qualitative methods, and integrated.ResultsData were analyzed from 39 documents, observation of 6 meetings, and 36 interviews. IKT included interaction at meetings, joint undertaking of research, and development of guidelines. IKT was most prevalent in one program with leadership, clear goals, dedicated funding and other infrastructural resources, and an embedded researcher responsible for, and actively engaged in IKT. This program achieved a variety of social, research and health service outcomes despite mixed individual views about the value of IKT and the absence of a programmatic culture of IKT. Participants noted numerous challenges including lack of time and incentives, and recommendations to support IKT. A conceptual framework of factors that influence IKT and associated outcomes was generated, and can be used by others to plan or evaluate IKT.ConclusionsThe findings can be applied by researchers, clinicians, managers or policy-makers to plan or improve collaborative decision-making for health services planning, delivery, evaluation or quality improvement. Further research is needed to explore whether these findings are widespread, and further understand how IKT can be optimized.

[1]  M. Gallagher,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Defining the Usefulness of Impact: lessons from a knowledge exchange project involving academics and social work practitioners , 2012 .

[2]  B. Paterson,et al.  A meeting of minds: interdisciplinary research in the health sciences in Canada , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[3]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[4]  A. Langley,et al.  Explaining Diffusion Patterns for Complex Health Care Innovations , 2002, Health care management review.

[5]  Vicky Ward,et al.  Exploring knowledge exchange: a useful framework for practice and policy. , 2012, Social Science & Medicine (1967).

[6]  Anita Kothari,et al.  A critical second look at integrated knowledge translation. , 2013, Health policy.

[7]  B. Swinburn,et al.  The development of a network for community-based obesity prevention: the CO-OPS Collaboration , 2011, BMC public health.

[8]  G. King,et al.  A framework of operating models for interdisciplinary research programs in clinical service organizations. , 2008, Evaluation and program planning.

[9]  K. McDonald.  Considering context in quality improvement interventions and implementation: concepts, frameworks, and application. , 2013, Academic pediatrics.

[10]  C. Estabrooks,et al.  Ingredients for change: revisiting a conceptual framework , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[11]  France Légaré,et al.  Health research funding agencies' support and promotion of knowledge translation: an international study. , 2008, The Milbank quarterly.

[12]  Réjean Landry,et al.  What factors induce health care decision-makers to use clinical guidelines? Evidence from provincial health ministries, regional health authorities and hospitals in Canada. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[13]  I. Graham,et al.  From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  C. Estabrooks,et al.  The Hidden Complexity of Long-Term Care: how context mediates knowledge translation and use of best practices. , 2014, The Gerontologist.

[15]  J Clark,et al.  How to peer review a qualitative manuscript , 2003 .

[16]  J Lomas,et al.  Using 'linkage and exchange' to move research into policy at a Canadian foundation. , 2000, Health affairs.

[17]  A. Booth,et al.  Exploring scale-up, spread, and sustainability: an instrumental case study tracing an innovation to enhance dysphagia care , 2013, Implementation Science.

[18]  Carl Auerbach,et al.  Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis , 2003 .

[19]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  The role of evidence, context, and facilitation in an implementation trial: implications for the development of the PARIHS framework , 2013, Implementation Science.

[20]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Peer Review in Health Sciences , 1999 .

[21]  Maria Jirwe,et al.  Analysing qualitative data. , 2011, Nurse researcher.

[22]  E. Hess,et al.  Development of the capacity necessary to perform and promote knowledge translation research in emergency medicine. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[23]  S. Piñeros,et al.  A qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation of pilot interventions in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Northwest Network. , 2004, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[24]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[25]  Rosaline S Barbour,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  S. Tee,et al.  'Closing the gap'--a partnership approach to community care education for long term conditions. , 2012, Nurse education today.

[27]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[28]  F. Wright,et al.  How can we improve cancer care? A review of interprofessional collaboration models and their use in clinical management. , 2011, Surgical oncology.

[29]  C. Estabrooks,et al.  Influence of Organizational Characteristics and Context on Research Utilization , 2007, Nursing research.

[30]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[31]  A. Oxman,et al.  Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[32]  M. Young,et al.  Health services research , 2008, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[33]  N. Mays,et al.  Health services research in Europe and its use for informing policy , 2011, Journal of health services research & policy.

[34]  Richard Baker,et al.  A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: A systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice , 2013, Implementation Science.

[35]  A. Kothari,et al.  Indicators at the interface: managing policymaker-researcher collaboration , 2011 .

[36]  B. Stevens,et al.  The influence of organizational context on the use of research by nurses in Canadian pediatric hospitals , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[37]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change , 1997 .

[38]  O. Robinson.  Relational Analysis: An Add-On Technique for Aiding Data Integration in Qualitative Research , 2011 .

[39]  A. Hofmeyer,et al.  Researcher-decision-maker partnerships in health services research: Practical challenges, guiding principles , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[40]  M. Barrett,et al.  Balancing exploration and exploitation in transferring research into practice: a comparison of five knowledge translation entity archetypes , 2013, Implementation Science.