Finding the Trustworthiness Nodes from Signed Social Networks

Abstract Online social network services have brought a kind of new lifestyle to the world that is parallel to people’s daily offline activities. Social network analysis provides a useful perspective on a range of social computing applications. Social interaction on the Web includes both positive and negative relationships, which is certainly important to social networks. The authors of this article found that the accuracy of the signs of links in the underlying social networks can be predicted. The trust that other users impart on a node is an important attribute of networks. In this article, the authors present a model to compute the prestige of nodes in a trust-based network. The model is based on the idea that trustworthy nodes weigh more. To fulfill this task, the authors first attempt to infer the attitude of one user toward another by predicting signed edges in networks. Then, the authors propose an algorithm to compute the prestige and trustworthiness where the edge weight denotes the trust score. To prove the algorithm’s effectiveness, the authors conducted experiments on the public dataset. Theoretical analysis and experimental results show that this method is efficient and effective.

[1]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  A clustering coefficient for weighted networks, with application to gene expression data , 2007, AI Commun..

[2]  Paul Van Dooren,et al.  The PageTrust Algorithm: How to rank web pages when negative links are allowed? , 2008, SDM.

[3]  Hector Garcia-Molina,et al.  The Eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks , 2003, WWW '03.

[4]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[5]  Ramanathan V. Guha,et al.  Propagation of trust and distrust , 2004, WWW '04.

[6]  David Liben-Nowell,et al.  The link-prediction problem for social networks , 2007 .

[7]  Christian Bauckhage,et al.  The slashdot zoo: mining a social network with negative edges , 2009, WWW.

[8]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Factor in the neighbors: Scalable and accurate collaborative filtering , 2010, TKDD.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Multiple Relationship Types in Online Communities and Social Networks , 2008, AAAI Spring Symposium: Social Information Processing.

[11]  Lillian Lee,et al.  Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis , 2008, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[12]  Padhraic Smyth,et al.  Algorithms for estimating relative importance in networks , 2003, KDD '03.

[13]  Jiming Liu,et al.  Community Mining from Signed Social Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[14]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[15]  Divyakant Agrawal,et al.  Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks , 2011, WWW.

[16]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[17]  Edo Liberty,et al.  Estimating sizes of social networks via biased sampling , 2011, Internet Math..

[18]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Social Network Analysis , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[19]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Community detection in incomplete information networks , 2012, WWW.

[20]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Friends and foes: ideological social networking , 2008, CHI.