A model for QoS-aware VNF placement and provisioning

Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a promising solution for telecom operators and service providers to improve business agility, by enabling a fast deployment of new services, and by making it possible for them to cope with the increasing traffic volume and service demand. NFV enables virtualization of network functions that can be deployed as virtual machines on general purpose server hardware in cloud environments, effectively reducing deployment and operational costs. To benefit from the advantages of NFV, virtual network functions (VNFs) need to be provisioned with sufficient resources and perform without impacting network quality of service (QoS). To this end, this paper proposes a model for VNFs placement and provisioning optimization while guaranteeing the latency requirements of the service chains. Our goal is to optimize resource utilization in order to reduce cost satisfying the QoS such as end-to-end latency. We extend a related VNFs placement optimization with a fine-grained latency model including virtualization overhead. The model is evaluated with a simulated network and it provides placement solutions ensuring the required QoS guarantees.

[1]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  On orchestrating virtual network functions , 2015, 2015 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM).

[2]  Gerhard Fettweis,et al.  The 5G-Enabled Tactile Internet: Applications, requirements, and architecture , 2016, 2016 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference.

[3]  Thomas Bauschert,et al.  Combined Virtual Mobile Core Network Function Placement and Topology Optimization with Latency Bounds , 2015, 2015 Fourth European Workshop on Software Defined Networks.

[4]  Michal Pioro,et al.  SNDlib 1.0—Survivable Network Design Library , 2010 .

[5]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  Applying NFV and SDN to LTE mobile core gateways, the functions placement problem , 2014, AllThingsCellular '14.

[6]  Petar Popovski,et al.  The METIS 5G System Concept: Meeting the 5G Requirements , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Wolfgang Kellerer,et al.  A Virtual SDN-Enabled LTE EPC Architecture: A Case Study for S-/P-Gateways Functions , 2013, 2013 IEEE SDN for Future Networks and Services (SDN4FNS).

[8]  Javid Taheri,et al.  Analysis of Network Latency in Virtualized Environments , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[9]  Cristina Cervello-Pastor,et al.  On the optimal allocation of virtual resources in cloud computing networks , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[10]  Guy Pujolle,et al.  QoS-Aware VNF Placement Optimization in Edge-Central Carrier Cloud Architecture , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[11]  Sachin Katti,et al.  ProCel: smart traffic handling for a scalable software EPC , 2014, HotSDN.

[12]  Joseph Naor,et al.  Near optimal placement of virtual network functions , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM).

[13]  Lucian Suciu,et al.  Enabling network programmability in LTE/EPC architecture using OpenFlow , 2014, 2014 12th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt).

[14]  Jing Zhu,et al.  Bandwidth guaranteed virtual network function placement and scaling in datacenter networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE 34th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC).

[15]  Raouf Boutaba,et al.  ViNEYard: Virtual Network Embedding Algorithms With Coordinated Node and Link Mapping , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.