Insula and Striatum Mediate the Default Bias

Humans are creatures of routine and habit. When faced with situations in which a default option is available, people show a consistent tendency to stick with the default. Why this occurs is unclear. To elucidate its neural basis, we used a novel gambling task in conjunction with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Behavioral results revealed that participants were more likely to choose the default card and felt enhanced emotional responses to outcomes after making the decision to switch. We show that increased tendency to switch away from the default during the decision phase was associated with decreased activity in the anterior insula; activation in this same area in reaction to “switching away from the default and losing” was positively related with experienced frustration. In contrast, decisions to choose the default engaged the ventral striatum, the same reward area as seen in winning. Our findings highlight aversive processes in the insula as underlying the default bias and suggest that choosing the default may be rewarding in itself.

[1]  C. Anderson The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result from Reason and Emotion , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Sabrina M. Tom,et al.  The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making Under Risk , 2007, Science.

[3]  S. Quartz,et al.  Human Insula Activation Reflects Risk Prediction Errors As Well As Risk , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Role for Subthalamic Nucleus Neurons in Switching from Automatic to Controlled Eye Movement , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[7]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Medicine. Do defaults save lives? , 2003, Science.

[8]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[9]  Dirk J. Heslenfeld,et al.  Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent , 2005, NeuroImage.

[10]  T. Robbins,et al.  Differential effects of insular and ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions on risky decision-making , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Brain Systems Mediating Aversive Conditioning: an Event-Related fMRI Study , 1998, Neuron.

[12]  K. Fliessbach,et al.  Social Comparison Affects Reward-Related Brain Activity in the Human Ventral Striatum , 2007, Science.

[13]  Paul J Laurienti,et al.  The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  E. Phelps,et al.  Neural mechanisms mediating optimism bias , 2007, Nature.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dissociable Roles of Ventral and Dorsal Striatum in Instrumental Conditioning , 2004, Science.

[16]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Pieters,et al.  The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The Construction of Preference: Do Defaults Save Lives? , 2006 .

[20]  Stephen M Fleming,et al.  Overcoming status quo bias in the human brain , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  A. Craig,et al.  How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Altering expectancy dampens neural response to aversive taste in primary taste cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Conjunction revisited , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Benedetto De Martino,et al.  How Choice Reveals and Shapes Expected Hedonic Outcome , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[26]  Corianne Rogalsky,et al.  Increased activation in the right insula during risk-taking decision making is related to harm avoidance and neuroticism , 2003, NeuroImage.

[27]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans , 2004, Nature.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias , 1991 .