Trade-offs and the evolution of life-histories during range expansion.

During range-advance, individuals on the expanding edge of the population face a unique selective environment. In this study, we use a three-trait trade-off model to explore the evolution of dispersal, reproduction and competitive ability during range expansion. We show that range expansion greatly affects the evolution of life-history traits due to differing selection pressures at the front of the range compared with those found in stationary and core populations. During range expansion, dispersal and reproduction are selected for on the expanding population front, whereas traits associated with fitness at equilibrium density (competitive ability) show dramatic declines. Additionally, we demonstrate that the presence of a competing species can considerably reduce the extent to which dispersal is selected upwards at an expanding front. These findings have important implications for understanding both the rate of spread of invasive species and the range-shifting dynamics of native species in response to climate change.

[1]  R. Fisher.  THE WAVE OF ADVANCE OF ADVANTAGEOUS GENES , 1937 .

[2]  J. G. Skellam.  Random dispersal in theoretical populations , 1951, Biometrika.

[3]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[4]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[5]  Brian Charlesworth,et al.  Selection in Density‐Regulated Populations , 1971 .

[6]  J. Roughgarden.  Density‐Dependent Natural Selection , 1971 .

[7]  Madhav Gadgil,et al.  The Concept of r- and K-Selection: Evidence from Wild Flowers and Some Theoretical Considerations , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[8]  R M May,et al.  Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  D. Roff.  THE EVOLUTION OF WING DIMORPHISM IN INSECTS , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  L. Cwynar,et al.  Geographical Variation of Lodgepole Pine in Relation to Population History , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[11]  S. Stearns.  Trade-offs in life-history evolution , 1989 .

[12]  Pierre-Henri Gouyon,et al.  Metapopulation Genetics and the Evolution of Dispersal , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[13]  R. Denno,et al.  Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. , 1997, Annual review of entomology.

[14]  Y. Michalakis,et al.  Evolutionarily stable dispersal rate in a metapopulation with extinctions and kin competition , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly's range margin , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  D. Roff.  Life History, Evolution of , 2001 .

[17]  James S. Clark,et al.  Invasion by Extremes: Population Spread with Variation in Dispersal and Reproduction , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[18]  D. Roff,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF TRADE‐OFFS: EFFECTS OF INBREEDING ON FECUNDITY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE CRICKET GRYLLUS FIRMUS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  H. Mooney,et al.  The evolutionary impact of invasive species , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  E. Siemann,et al.  Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species , 2001 .

[21]  D. Roff,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF TRADE-OFFS: EFFECTS OF INBREEDING ON FECUNDITY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE CRICKET GRYLLUS FIRMUS , 2001 .

[22]  L. Conradt,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins , 2001 .

[23]  Rebecca E. Irwin,et al.  Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory , 2002 .

[24]  Justin M. J. Travis,et al.  Dispersal evolution during invasions , 2002 .

[25]  I. Hanski,et al.  Population history and life history influence the migration rate of female Glanville fritillary butterflies , 2002 .

[26]  G. Yohe,et al.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems , 2003, Nature.

[27]  C. Dytham,et al.  Evolutionary trade-offs between reproduction and dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  J. Lambrinos.  HOW INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION INFLUENCE CONTEMPORARY INVASION DYNAMICS , 2004 .

[29]  D. Reznick,et al.  The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution , 2004, Genetica.

[30]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Variation in migration propensity among individuals maintained by landscape structure , 2004 .

[31]  O. Phillips,et al.  Extinction risk from climate change , 2004, Nature.

[32]  Caz M Taylor,et al.  The spatial spread of invasions: new developments in theory and evidence , 2004 .

[33]  H. G. Davis.  r-Selected Traits in an Invasive Population , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[34]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  Dispersal-related life-history trade-offs in a butterfly metapopulation. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[35]  Richard Shine,et al.  Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Karin Johst,et al.  Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[37]  C. Dytham,et al.  Modelling and analysing evolution of dispersal in populations at expanding range boundaries , 2007 .

[38]  D. Roff,et al.  The evolution of trade‐offs: where are we? , 2007, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[39]  T. Hovestadt,et al.  The relative contribution of individual and kin selection to the evolution of density-dependent dispersal rates , 2007 .

[40]  H. Andrén,et al.  Composition of an avian guild in spatially structured habitats supports a competition–colonization trade-off , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Justin M. J. Travis,et al.  Landscape structure and boundary effects determine the fate of mutations occurring during range expansions , 2008, Heredity.

[42]  D. Roff,et al.  Male sand crickets trade‐off flight capability for reproductive potential , 2008, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[43]  A. Johansson,et al.  Seasonal polyphenism and developmental trade-offs between flight ability and egg laying in a pierid butterfly , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  M. Leishman,et al.  Reproductive output of invasive versus native plants. , 2008 .

[45]  S. Keller,et al.  History, chance and adaptation during biological invasion: separating stochastic phenotypic evolution from response to selection. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[46]  J. Travis,et al.  The Frequency of Fitness Peak Shifts Is Increased at Expanding Range Margins Due to Mutation Surfing , 2008, Genetics.

[47]  Richard Shine,et al.  Reid’s Paradox Revisited: The Evolution of Dispersal Kernels during Range Expansion , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[48]  A. Suarez,et al.  The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[49]  Tim G Benton,et al.  Accelerating invasion rates result from the evolution of density-dependent dispersal. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[50]  B. Phillips.  The evolution of growth rates on an expanding range edge , 2009, Biology Letters.