Deducing of Optimal Machine Learning Algorithms for Heterogeneity

For defining the optimal machine learning algorithm, the decision was not easy for which we shall choose. To help future researchers, we describe in this paper the optimal among the best of the algorithms. We built a synthetic data set and performed the supervised machine learning runs for five different algorithms. For heterogeneity, we identified Random Forest, among others, to be the best algorithm.

[1]  Sylvie Chevalier,et al.  Pore-Scale Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Oil-Water Flow in Carbonate Rock with Variable Wettability , 2015 .

[2]  Hadi Belhaj,et al.  Carbonate Rock Type Matrix RocMat, The Ultimate Rock Properties Catalogue , 2013 .

[3]  Igor Varfolomeev,et al.  An Application of Deep Neural Networks for Segmentation of Microtomographic Images of Rock Samples , 2019, Comput..

[4]  Tadesse Weldu Teklu,et al.  Hybrid Artificial Intelligence and Conventional Empirical Approach for improved Prediction of Log-Derived Permeability of Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir , 2010 .

[5]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Mohamed Sassi,et al.  Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination , 2021, ArXiv.

[7]  Omar Al-Farisi,et al.  Electrical Resistivity and Gamma-Ray Logs: Two Physics for Two Permeability Estimation Approaches in Abu Dhabi Carbonates , 2004 .

[8]  Mohamed Sassi,et al.  Machine Learning for 3D Image Recognition to Determine Porosity and Lithology of Heterogeneous Carbonate Rock , 2019, Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019.

[9]  John W. Fisher,et al.  Learning from Examples with Information Theoretic Criteria , 2000, J. VLSI Signal Process..

[10]  Omar Al-Farisi,et al.  Revelation of Carbonate Rock Typing—The Resolved Gap , 2009 .

[11]  Omar Al-Farisi,et al.  Hybrid Log-Derived Permeability Prediction Model for a Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir with Tarmat Layers Considering Different Levels of Cutoffs , 2010 .

[12]  Wayne L. Winston,et al.  Microsoft Excel Data Analysis and Business Modeling , 2004 .

[13]  David H. Wolpert,et al.  Stacked generalization , 1992, Neural Networks.

[14]  V. Kvasnicka,et al.  Neural and Adaptive Systems: Fundamentals Through Simulations , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  Xing Xu,et al.  Cretaceous age for the feathered dinosaurs of Liaoning, China , 1999, Nature.

[16]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[17]  Andreas Müller,et al.  Introduction to Machine Learning with Python: A Guide for Data Scientists , 2016 .

[18]  Glenn Fung,et al.  On the Dangers of Cross-Validation. An Experimental Evaluation , 2008, SDM.

[19]  Zhaohui Zheng,et al.  Stochastic gradient boosted distributed decision trees , 2009, CIKM.

[20]  Tie-Yan Liu,et al.  LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree , 2017, NIPS.

[21]  Shruti Mishra,et al.  Machine learning in a data-limited regime: Augmenting experiments with synthetic data uncovers order in crumpled sheets , 2018, Science Advances.

[22]  Omar Al Farisi,et al.  Quantification of Fracture Permeability From Micro Resistivity Logs in Offshore Abu Dhabi Reservoir , 2006 .

[23]  Martin J. Blunt,et al.  Reconstruction of three-dimensional porous media using generative adversarial neural networks , 2017, Physical review. E.

[24]  Philippe Robert,et al.  Sparse Multi-Channel Variational Autoencoder for the Joint Analysis of Heterogeneous Data , 2019, ICML.

[25]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  Metainference: A Bayesian inference method for heterogeneous systems , 2015, Science Advances.

[26]  Janina Decker,et al.  Modern Business Statistics With Microsoft Excel , 2016 .