Quantum Annealing for Constrained Optimization

Recent advances in quantum technology have led to the development and manufacturing of experimental programmable quantum annealers that promise to solve certain combinatorial optimization problems of practical relevance faster than their classical analogues. The applicability of such devices for many theoretical and real-world optimization problems, which are often constrained, is severely limited by the sparse, rigid layout of the devices' quantum bits. Traditionally, constraints are addressed by the addition of penalty terms to the Hamiltonian of the problem, which in turn requires prohibitively increasing physical resources while also restricting the dynamical range of the interactions. Here, we propose a method for encoding constrained optimization problems on quantum annealers that eliminates the need for penalty terms and thereby reduces the number of required couplers and removes the need for minor embedding, greatly reducing the number of required physical qubits. We argue the advantages of the proposed technique and illustrate its effectiveness. We conclude by discussing the experimental feasibility of the suggested method as well as its potential to appreciably reduce the resource requirements for implementing optimization problems on quantum annealers, and its significance in the field of quantum computing.

[1]  G. Florio,et al.  XX model on the circle , 2008, 0801.1394.

[2]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Quantum annealing correction with minor embedding , 2015, 1507.02658.

[3]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity , 1981 .

[4]  Alexander Elgart,et al.  The Adiabatic Theorem of Quantum Mechanics , 1998 .

[5]  Ryan Babbush,et al.  What is the Computational Value of Finite Range Tunneling , 2015, 1512.02206.

[6]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Adiabatic approximation with exponential accuracy for many-body systems and quantum computation , 2008, 0808.2697.

[7]  M. Ruskai,et al.  Bounds for the adiabatic approximation with applications to quantum computation , 2006, quant-ph/0603175.

[8]  Matthew French,et al.  Experimental quantum annealing: case study involving the graph isomorphism problem , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Size dependence of the minimum excitation gap in the quantum adiabatic algorithm. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[10]  Vicky Choi,et al.  Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design , 2010, Quantum Inf. Process..

[11]  E. Farhi,et al.  A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem , 2001, Science.

[12]  Rosenbaum,et al.  Quantum annealing of a disordered magnet , 1999, Science.

[13]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Tunneling spectroscopy using a probe qubit , 2012, 1210.6310.

[14]  A. Young,et al.  First-order phase transition in the quantum adiabatic algorithm. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[15]  H. Nishimori,et al.  Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model , 1998, cond-mat/9804280.

[16]  Tosio Kato On the Adiabatic Theorem of Quantum Mechanics , 1950 .

[17]  Jeremy Frank,et al.  Parametrized Families of Hard Planning Problems from Phase Transitions , 2014, AAAI.

[18]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Bryan O'Gorman,et al.  A case study in programming a quantum annealer for hard operational planning problems , 2014, Quantum Information Processing.

[20]  Itay Hen,et al.  Exponential Complexity of the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm for certain Satisfiability Problems , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  E. Lieb,et al.  Two Soluble Models of an Antiferromagnetic Chain , 1961 .

[22]  L. Clark,et al.  Ramsey numbers and adiabatic quantum computing. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[23]  Lane H. Clark,et al.  Graph isomorphism and adiabatic quantum computing , 2013, ArXiv.

[24]  I. Hen Excitation gap from optimized correlation functions in quantum Monte Carlo simulations. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[25]  Vicky Choi,et al.  Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: I. The parameter setting problem , 2008, Quantum Inf. Process..

[26]  Andrew Lucas,et al.  Ising formulations of many NP problems , 2013, Front. Physics.

[27]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Quantum annealing with manufactured spins , 2011, Nature.

[28]  J. Doll,et al.  Quantum annealing: A new method for minimizing multidimensional functions , 1994, chem-ph/9404003.