Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture

I will describe how orthographic processing acts as a central interface between visual and linguistic processing during reading, and as such can be considered to be the ‘mid-level vision’ of reading research. In order to make this case, I first summarize the evidence in favour of letter-based word recognition before examining work investigating how orthographic similarities among words influence single word reading. I describe how evidence gradually accumulated against traditional measures of orthographic similarity and the associated theories of orthographic processing, forcing a reconsideration of how letter-position information is represented by skilled readers. Then, I present the theoretical framework that was developed to explain these findings, with a focus on the distinction between location-specific and location-invariant orthographic representations. Finally, I describe work extending this theoretical framework in two main directions: first, to the realm of reading development, with the aim to specify the key changes in the processing of letters and letter strings that accompany successful learning to read, and second, to the realm of sentence reading, in order to specify how orthographic information can be processed across several words in parallel, and how skilled readers keep track of which letters belong to which words.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[2]  Colin J Davis,et al.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.

[3]  Isabelle Bülthoff,et al.  Face format at encoding affects the other-race effect in face memory. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[4]  Simon P. Tiffin-Richards,et al.  Children's and adults' parafoveal processes in German: Phonological and orthographic effects , 2015 .

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[6]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[7]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Resolving the locus of cAsE aLtErNaTiOn effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked priming , 2015, Cognition.

[8]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Letter Perception , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Joël Pynte,et al.  What determines the eyes’ landing position in words? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[11]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[12]  James S Adelman,et al.  Letters in time and retinotopic space. , 2011, Psychological review.

[13]  S. Andrews,et al.  Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: individual differences in masked form priming. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Linked linear mixed models: A joint analysis of fixation locations and fixation durations in natural reading , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[15]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography , 2008 .

[16]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Deciphering CAPTCHAs: What a Turing Test Reveals about Human Cognition , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  J. Pynte,et al.  Visual and linguistic determinants of the eyes' initial fixation position in reading development. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[18]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  S. Lupker,et al.  Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆ , 2004 .

[20]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. , 1992 .

[21]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Edge-Aligned Embedded Word Activation Initiates Morpho-orthographic Segmentation , 2017 .

[22]  M. Pickering,et al.  An experimental approach to linguistic representation , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  An ERP investigation of location invariance in masked repetition priming , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  What is special about orthographic processing , 2014 .

[25]  Wei Zhou,et al.  Lexical and sublexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  K. Yokosawa,et al.  Rapid Extraction of Gist From Visual Text and Its Influence on Word Recognition , 2011, The Journal of general psychology.

[27]  J. Fagard,et al.  Mechanisms of attention in reading parafoveal words: a cross-linguistic study in children. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[28]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  References and Notes , 2022 .

[29]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An event-related potentials (ERP) investigation , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.

[30]  J. Grainger,et al.  On the time-course of adjacent and non-adjacent transposed-letter priming , 2014, Journal of cognitive psychology.

[31]  P. Paz-Alonso,et al.  The Impact of Literacy on Position Uncertainty , 2015, Psychological science.

[32]  K. Forster,et al.  REPETITION PRIMING AND FREQUENCY ATTENUATION IN LEXICAL ACCESS , 1984 .

[33]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Effects of word length on eye movement control: The evidence from Arabic , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  J. Grainger,et al.  An Electrophysiological Study of the Effects of Orthographic Neighborhood Size on Printed Word Perception , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter String Processing and Visual Short-Term Memory , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  M Mason,et al.  Recognition time for letters and nonletters: effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  Consonants and vowels contribute differently to visual word recognition: ERPs of relative position priming. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[39]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Initial Fixation Location Effects in Reading Hebrew Words , 1999 .

[41]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Modelling reading development through phonological decoding and self-teaching: implications for dyslexia , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Commentary on Section 3 – Moving Eyes and Reading Words: How Can a Computational Model Combine the Two? , 2003 .

[43]  Katherine J. Midgley,et al.  On the time course of letter perception: A masked priming ERP investigation , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  J HolcombPhillip,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition , 2006 .

[45]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Orthographic regularity gradually modulates saccade amplitudes in reading , 2004 .

[46]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Integration of Parafoveal Orthographic Information during Foveal Word Reading: beyond the sub-lexical level? , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency , 2008 .

[48]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[49]  J. Bowers,et al.  Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a hat in that? , 2005 .

[50]  Martin H Fischer,et al.  Serial and parallel processes in eye movement control: Current controversies and future directions , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of Phonological and Orthographic Neighbourhood Density Interact in Visual Word Recognition , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[52]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  An ERP investigation of orthographic priming with relative-position and absolute-position primes , 2009, Brain Research.

[53]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition , 1998 .

[54]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does location uncertainty in letter position coding emerge because of literacy training? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  G. V. van Orden A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading. , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[56]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[57]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The front end of visual word recognition , 2012 .

[58]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-Letter Confusability Effects in Masked Form Priming , 2003 .

[59]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Raeding Wrods With Jubmled Lettres , 2006, Psychological science.

[60]  Katherine J. Midgley,et al.  Interactions in the neighborhood: Effects of orthographic and phonological neighbors on N400 amplitude , 2017, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[61]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Eye movements guided by morphological structure: Evidence from the Uighur language , 2014, Cognition.

[62]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The Time Course of Orthographic and Phonological Code Activation , 2006 .

[63]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Semantic preview benefit during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Mindless reading: Eye-movement characteristics are similar in scanning letter strings and reading texts , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[66]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[67]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal-foveal overlap can facilitate ongoing word identification during reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Transposed-letter effects in reading: evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[70]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  J Grainger,et al.  The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[72]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: an ideal-observer model of reading. , 1997, Psychological review.

[73]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient , 1990, Nature.

[74]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[75]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Shared neighborhood effects in masked orthographic priming , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[76]  James J. Clark,et al.  Word ambiguity and the optimal viewing position in reading , 1999, Vision Research.

[77]  Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al.  Object Recognition , 2008, Computer Vision.

[78]  D. Share Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition , 1995, Cognition.

[79]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[80]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Adaptation of the human visual system to the statistics of letters and line configurations , 2015, NeuroImage.

[81]  David E. Rumelhart,et al.  Toward an interactive model of reading. , 1994 .

[82]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[83]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Deep Learning of Orthographic Representations in Baboons , 2014, PloS one.

[84]  Sally Andrews,et al.  From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing , 2006 .

[85]  Elizabeth R Schotter,et al.  Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[86]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[87]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[88]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Effects of Masked Homophone Primes , 1994 .

[89]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read , 2012, Cognition.

[90]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[91]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[92]  J. Pynte,et al.  Word-shape and word-lexical-frequency effects in lexical-decision and naming tasks , 2003 .

[93]  Kate Nation,et al.  How does orthographic learning happen , 2006 .

[94]  K. Rastle,et al.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[95]  A. Guérin-Dugué,et al.  An analysis of reading skill development using E-Z Reader , 2015, Journal of cognitive psychology.

[96]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[97]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Transposed-Letter Effects Reveal Orthographic Processing in Baboons , 2013, Psychological science.

[98]  Marianna D. Eddy,et al.  Orthographic and phonological processing in developing readers revealed by ERPs. , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[99]  Reem Abu Mallouh,et al.  In Defense of Position Uncertainty , 2015, Psychological science.

[100]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of baseword frequency and orthographic neighborhood size in pseudohomophone naming , 2000 .

[101]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[102]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  The sentence superiority effect revisited , 2017, Cognition.

[103]  J. Changeux,et al.  Les neurones de la lecture , 2007 .

[104]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[105]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[106]  D. Green,et al.  Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[107]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Letters, Numbers, and Symbols to Character Transpositions , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[108]  J C Ziegler,et al.  Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: still a challenge for current word recognition models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[109]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Orthographic familiarity influences initial eye fixation positions in reading , 2004 .

[110]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[111]  P. W. Kerr,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words , 1987, Vision Research.

[112]  Jonathan Grainger Orthographic Processing and Reading , 2016 .

[113]  H. Blythe Developmental Changes in Eye Movements and Visual Information Encoding Associated With Learning to Read , 2014 .

[114]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  A Note on the Informativeness of Parts of Words , 1958 .

[115]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Visual constraints in written word recognition: evidence from the optimal viewing-position effect , 2005 .

[116]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. , 2004, Psychological review.

[117]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.

[118]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[119]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[120]  T. Nazir,et al.  Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[121]  S. Andrews Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[122]  J Grainger,et al.  Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[123]  S. Zdravković,et al.  Side flankers produce less crowding, but only for letters , 2015, Cognition.

[124]  Michele Scaltritti,et al.  Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[125]  Trevor Brothers,et al.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[126]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[127]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[128]  S. M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[129]  S. Andrews Lexical Retrieval and Selection Processes: Effects of Transposed-Letter Confusability , 1996 .

[130]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[131]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration and inter-letter spacing on letter-in-string identification. , 2014, Acta Psychologica.

[132]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[133]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Watching the Word Go by: On the Time-course of Component Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[134]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Interactive Activation Accounts of Morphological Decomposition: Finding the Trap in Mousetrap? , 1999, Brain and Language.

[135]  V. Csépe,et al.  Adaptive specialization in position encoding while learning to read. , 2017, Developmental science.

[136]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition. , 2008 .

[137]  K. Rayner,et al.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[138]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[139]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[140]  J. Grainger,et al.  Phonology and Orthography in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Masked Non-Word Priming , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[141]  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia,et al.  Orthographic Coding in Illiterates and Literates , 2014, Psychological science.

[142]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading transposed text: effects of transposed letter distance and consonant-vowel status on eye movements , 2014, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[143]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[144]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception , 2004 .

[145]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? , 1992 .

[146]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[147]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[148]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Are Transposition Effects Specific to Letters? , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[149]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Orthographic and phonological contributions to reading development: tracking developmental trajectories using masked priming. , 2014, Developmental psychology.

[150]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How Initial Fixation Position Influences Visual Word Recognition: A Comparison of French and Arabic , 1996, Brain and Language.

[151]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[152]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Protein Analysis Meets Visual Word Recognition: A Case for String Kernels in the Brain , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[153]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A Thousand Words Are Worth a Picture , 2015, Psychological science.

[154]  Eckart Scheerer,et al.  Early German approaches to experimental reading research: The contributions of Wilhelm Wundt and Ernst Meumann , 1981 .

[155]  J. Ziegler,et al.  MROM-p: An Interactive Activation, Multiple Readout Model of Orthographic and Phonological Processes in Visual Word Recognition , 2013 .

[156]  Lynn Huestegge,et al.  Oculomotor and linguistic determinants of reading development: A longitudinal study , 2009, Vision Research.

[157]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Tests of a model of multi-word reading: effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[158]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming , 1991 .

[159]  J. M. Cattell THE TIME IT TAKES TO SEE AND NAME OBJECTS , 1886 .

[160]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[161]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths , 2000, Psychological research.

[162]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[163]  J. Grainger,et al.  Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[164]  Kristi A. Kiyonaga,et al.  The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. , 1993, Psychological science.

[165]  J. Grainger,et al.  Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[166]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. , 2013, Developmental review : DR.

[167]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Parafoveal preview effects depend on both preview plausibility and target predictability , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[168]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[169]  A. Jacobs,et al.  On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[170]  Philip T Quinlan,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word identification , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[171]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Morphological structure influences the initial landing position in words during reading Finnish , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[172]  Casimir J. H. Ludwig,et al.  The visual system supports online translation invariance for object identification , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[173]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[174]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[175]  George Wolford,et al.  Retinal location and string position as important variables in visual information processing , 1974 .

[176]  Kevin Diependaele,et al.  Derivational morphology and skilled reading: an empirical overview , 2012 .

[177]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[178]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical Effects of Shifting Letter Position in Letter Strings of Varying Length , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[179]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[180]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[181]  Florian Hutzler,et al.  A similar correction mechanism in slow and fluent readers after suboptimal landing positions , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[182]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Masked priming from orthographic neighbors: an ERP investigation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[183]  J. Grainger,et al.  Priming word recognition with orthographic neighbors: effects of relative prime-target frequency. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[184]  Colin J. Davis,et al.  SOLAR versus SERIOL revisited , 2010 .

[185]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Does “whole-word shape” play a role in visual word recognition? , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[186]  Can masked priming effects be obtained with words? , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[187]  L. E. Krueger A Theory of Perceptual Matching , 1978 .

[188]  J. Ziegler,et al.  A developmental investigation of the first-letter advantage. , 2016, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[189]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[190]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[191]  J. Grainger,et al.  The "electrophysiological sandwich": a method for amplifying ERP priming effects. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[192]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Developmental eye-tracking research in reading: Introduction to the special issue , 2015 .

[193]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[194]  J. Grainger,et al.  Integrating Orthographic Information Across Time and Space , 2018 .

[195]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading , 2017, PloS one.

[196]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[197]  Richard Shillcock,et al.  Serial and parallel processing in reading: Investigating the effects of parafoveal orthographic information on nonisolated word recognition , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[198]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[199]  K. Rayner Eye Guidance in Reading: Fixation Locations within Words , 1979, Perception.

[200]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[201]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Both-edges representation of letter position in reading , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[202]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Erp Correlates of Transposed-letter Priming Effects: the Role of Vowels versus Consonants , 2022 .

[203]  Séverine Casalis,et al.  Language proficiency and morpho-orthographic segmentation , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[204]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Effects of number, complexity, and familiarity of flankers on crowded letter identification. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[205]  Fabienne Chetail,et al.  Reconsidering the role of orthographic redundancy in visual word recognition , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[206]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Visual and Phonological Codes in Letter and Word Recognition: Evidence from Incremental Priming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[207]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Letter-case information and the identification of brand names. , 2015, British journal of psychology.

[208]  Jeesun Kim,et al.  A behavioral database for masked form priming , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[209]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters , 2004 .

[210]  Chris Davis,et al.  The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: interference effects from a masked prime , 1991 .

[211]  Clive Frankish,et al.  SIHGT and SUNOD: The role of orthography and phonology in the perception of transposed letter anagrams , 2007 .

[212]  Ronan G. Reilly,et al.  Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[213]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A Vision of Reading , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[214]  M. Sigman,et al.  The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[215]  Manuel Perea,et al.  A challenging dissociation in masked identity priming with the lexical decision task. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[216]  J. Grainger Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. , 1990 .

[217]  J. Grainger,et al.  Evidence for Letter-Specific Position Coding Mechanisms , 2013, PloS one.

[218]  R. Radach,et al.  Eye movements in developing readers: A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading , 2014 .

[219]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[220]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Word length and landing position effects during reading in children and adults , 2009, Vision Research.

[221]  S. Lupker,et al.  Masked inhibitory priming in english: evidence for lexical inhibition. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[222]  F. Meunier,et al.  Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing , 2005 .

[223]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Temporal Integration of Information in Orthographic Priming , 1999 .

[224]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[225]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On Coding Non-Contiguous Letter Combinations , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[226]  L E Krueger,et al.  A theory of perceptual matching. , 1978, Psychological review.

[227]  C. Whitney How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[228]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Do irregular letter combinations attract readers' attention? Evidence from fixation locations in words. , 1995 .

[229]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. , 1987 .