Bayesian inference for source determination with applications to a complex urban environment

Abstract The problem of determining the source of an emission from the limited information provided by a finite and noisy set of concentration measurements obtained from real-time sensors is an ill-posed inverse problem. In general, this problem cannot be solved uniquely without additional information. A Bayesian probabilistic inferential framework, which provides a natural means for incorporating both errors (model and observational) and prior (additional) information about the source, is presented. Here, Bayesian inference is applied to find the posterior probability density function of the source parameters (location and strength) given a set of concentration measurements. It is shown how the source–receptor relationship required in the determination of the likelihood function can be efficiently calculated using the adjoint of the transport equation for the scalar concentration. The posterior distribution of the source parameters is sampled using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The inverse source determination method is validated against real data sets acquired in a highly disturbed flow field in an urban environment. The data sets used to validate the proposed methodology include a water-channel simulation of the near-field dispersion of contaminant plumes in a large array of building-like obstacles (Mock Urban Setting Trial) and a full-scale field experiment (Joint Urban 2003) in Oklahoma City. These two examples demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach for inverse source determination.

[1]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  Numerical modelling of the turbulent flow developing within and over a 3-d building array, part ii: a mathematical foundation for a distributed drag force approach , 2005 .

[2]  John D. Wilson,et al.  A re-examination of the integrated horizontal flux method for estimating volatilisation from circular plots , 1992 .

[3]  M. Sohn,et al.  Rapidly Locating and Characterizing Pollutant Releases in Buildings , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[4]  Lars-Erik De Gear Sniffing out clandestine tests , 1996, Nature.

[5]  Katherine von Stackelberg,et al.  Estimation of fugitive lead emission rates from secondary lead facilities using hierarchical Bayesian models. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  R. T. Cox Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation , 1990 .

[7]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  Progress and challenges in the development of physically-based numerical models for prediction of flow and contaminant dispersion in the urban environment , 2006 .

[8]  E. Jaynes Probability theory : the logic of science , 2003 .

[9]  B. Kosović,et al.  Source Inversion for Contaminant Plume Dispersion in Urban Environments Using Building-Resolving Simulations , 2005 .

[10]  K Jerry Allwine Urban Dispersion Processes Investigated During the Joint Urban 2003 Study in Oklahoma City , 2004 .

[11]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Backward-Time Lagrangian Stochastic Dispersion Models and Their Application to Estimate Gaseous Emissions , 1995 .

[12]  Yuri N. Skiba,et al.  On a method of detecting the industrial plants which violate prescribed emission rates , 2003 .

[13]  Lennart Robertson Extended back-trajectories by means of adjoint equations , 2004 .

[14]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Concentration Fluctuation Measurements in a Plume Dispersing Through a Regular Array of Obstacles , 2004 .

[15]  P. Gregory Bayesian Logical Data Analysis for the Physical Sciences: A Comparative Approach with Mathematica® Support , 2005 .

[16]  Janusz A. Pudykiewicz,et al.  APPLICATION OF ADJOINT TRACER TRANSPORT EQUATIONS FOR EVALUATING SOURCE PARAMETERS , 1998 .

[17]  Mustafa M. Aral,et al.  Identification of Contaminant Source Location and Release History in Aquifers , 2001 .

[18]  Frédéric Hourdin,et al.  Sub‐surface nuclear tests monitoring through the CTBT Xenon Network , 2000 .

[19]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  A method for enforcing parameter nonnegativity in Bayesian inverse problems with an application to contaminant source identification , 2003 .

[20]  Sylvia Richardson,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice , 1997 .

[21]  Arye Nehorai,et al.  Landmine detection and localization using chemical sensor array processing , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[22]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Validation of Bayesian Inference for Emission Source Distribution Reconstruction Using the Joint Urban 2003 and European Tracer Experiments , 2006 .

[23]  Eugene Yee,et al.  Comparison of Wind-tunnel and Water-channel Simulations of Plume Dispersion through a Large Array of Obstacles with a Scaled Field Experiment , 2006 .

[24]  Len-Fu W. Chang,et al.  Relative source contribution analysis using an air trajectory statistical approach , 2002 .

[25]  C. Skordis,et al.  Fast and reliable Markov chain Monte Carlo technique for cosmological parameter estimation , 2005 .

[26]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[27]  Hubert B. Keller,et al.  Source localization by spatially distributed electronic noses for advection and diffusion , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.