The effect of electron acceptor variations on the behaviour of Thiosphaera pantotropha and Paracoccus denitrificans in pure and mixed cultures

The competitive advantages provided by a capacity for aerobic denitrification have been tested by comparing Thiosphaera pantotropha (which denitrifies aerobically and anaerobically), with a strain of Paracoccus denitrificans (which only denitrifies under anaerobic conditions) in acetate-limited chemostats. A comparison of μ-Cs curves based on Ks and μmax measurements indicated that Pa. denitrificans could be expected to dominate mixtures of the two species at high growth rates when the dissolved oxygen was above 80% of air saturation and NH3 was the sole source of nitrogen. The comparison also suggested t that at lower growth rates, lower dissolved oxygen tensions, and/or in the presence of nitrate, Tsa. pantotropha should have the competitive advantage. Chemostat experiments with mixtures of the two species showed that Tsa. pantotropha did, indeed, dominate the population when expected. However, when Pa. denitrificans was expected to dominate, only a small increase in the Pa. denitrificans numbers was possible before Tsa. pantotropha formed a biofilm on the walls of the chemostat instead of washing out, and was again able to out-compete Pa. denitrificans for acetate. Experiments with axenic chemostat cultures subjected to aerobic/anaerobic switches showed that Tsa. pantotropha, with its constitutive denitrifying system, was able to adjust smoothly to the changing environmental conditions and thus continued to grow. Pa. denitrificans does not have constitutive denitrifying enzymes, and could consequently not adjust its metabolism to the lack of oxygen rapidly enough. It therefore washed out at a rate equivalent to the dilution rate.

[1]  E. W. V. van Niel,et al.  Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification in Aerobic Chemostat Cultures of Thiosphaera pantotropha , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  J. Kuenen,et al.  Heterotrophic Nitrification in Thiosphaera-Pantotropha - Oxygen-Uptake and Enzyme Studies , 1988 .

[3]  J. Kuenen,et al.  Ecology of nitrification and denitrification , 1988 .

[4]  G. Muyzer,et al.  A Combined Immunofluorescence-DNA-Fluorescence Staining Technique for Enumeration of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans in a Population of Acidophilic Bacteria , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  J. J. Heijnen Biological Industrial waste-water treatment minimizing biomass Production and maximizing biomass Concentration , 1984 .

[6]  J. Kuenen,et al.  Thiosphaera pantotropha gen. nov. sp. nov., a Facultatively Anaerobic, Facultatively Autotrophic Sulphur Bacterium , 1983 .

[7]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The basis of the control of nitrate reduction by oxygen in Paracoccus denitrificans , 1981 .

[8]  D. Kell,et al.  Estimation with an ion-selective electrode of the membrane potential in cells of Paracoccus denitrificans from the uptake of the butyltriphenylphosphonium cation during aerobic and anaerobic respiration. , 1981, The Biochemical journal.

[9]  B. F. Taylor,et al.  New Facultative Thiobacillus and a Reevaluation of the Heterotrophic Potential of Thiobacillus novellus , 1969, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  D. Nicholas,et al.  Aerobic and anaerobic respiration in Micrococcus denitrificans. , 1969, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[11]  J. E. Scott,et al.  A RAPID AND PRECISE METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF UREA , 1960, Journal of clinical pathology.

[12]  D. Frear,et al.  Spectrophotometric Method for Determining Hydroxylamine Reductase Activity in Higher Plants , 1955 .

[13]  J. Goa A micro biuret method for protein determination; determination of total protein in cerebrospinal fluid. , 1953, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[14]  J. Monod,et al.  Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes , 1942 .