Quantitative evaluation of radiation-induced changes in sperm morphology and chromatin distribution.

Sperm head cytometry provides a useful assay for the detection of radiation-induced damage in mouse germ cells. Exposure of the gonads to radiation is known to lead to an increase of diploid and higher polyploid sperm and of sperm with head shape abnormalities. In the pilot studies reported here quantitative analysis of the total DNA content, the morphology, and the chromatin distribution of mouse sperm was performed. The goal was to evaluate the discriminative power of features derived by high resolution image cytometry in distinguishing sperm of control and irradiated mice. Our results suggest that besides the induction of the above mentioned variations in DNA content and shape of sperm head, changes of the nonhomogeneous chromatin distribution within the sperm may also be used to quantify the radiation effect on sperm cells. Whereas the chromatin distribution features show larger variations for sperm 21 days after exposure (dpr), the shape parameters seem to be more important to discriminate sperm 35 dpr. This may be explained by differentiation processes, which take place in different stages during mouse spermatogenesis.

[1]  W. Göhde,et al.  Radiation-induced diploid spermatids in mice. , 1989, International journal of radiation biology.

[2]  Heinrich Niemann,et al.  Klassifikation von Mustern , 1983 .

[3]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image processing , 1971 .

[4]  D. Pinkel.  Cytometric Analysis of Mammalian Sperm for Induced Morphologic and DNA Content Errors , 1984 .

[5]  W. Göhde,et al.  Mammalian Spermatogenesis as a Biological Dosimeter for Ionizing Radiation , 1984 .

[6]  W. R. Bruce,et al.  Abnormalities in the shape of murine sperm after acute testicular x-irradiation. , 1974, Mutation research.

[7]  Gledhill Bl.  Studies on the DNA content, dry mass and optical area of morphologically normal and abnormal bull spermatozoal heads. , 1966 .

[8]  G. Burger,et al.  SPECIMEN CLASSIFICATION IN CYTOMETRY: AN INTERCOMPARISON OF VARIOUS MEANS OF DECISION MAKING , 1986 .

[9]  M. Melamed,et al.  Detection of Male Reproductive Abnormalities by Flow Cytometry Measurements of Testicular and Ejaculated Germ Cells , 1984 .

[10]  J. F. Mayer,et al.  Spermatogenesis in the mouse. I. Autoradiographic studies of nuclear incorporation and loss of 3H-amino acids , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  A. Wyrobek.  The Induction of Sperm-shape Abnormalities in Mice and Humans. , 1978 .

[12]  P. S. Guraya.  Biology of Spermatogenesis and Spermatozoa in Mammals , 1987, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[13]  E. Oakberg.  A new concept of spermatogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse and its relationship to genetic effects. , 1971, Mutation research.

[14]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[15]  A. Rademaker,et al.  The relationship between sperm chromosomal abnormalities and sperm morphology in humans. , 1988, Mutation research.

[16]  G. Burger,et al.  Geräte zur quantitativen Mikroskopie , 1988 .

[17]  W. R. Bruce,et al.  Chromosomal abnormalities and the morphology of mouse sperm heads. , 1975, Canadian journal of genetics and cytology. Journal canadien de genetique et de cytologie.