The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals

The article employs deep log analysis (DLA) techniques, a more sophisticated form of transaction log analysis, to demonstrate what usage data can disclose about information seeking behaviour of virtual scholars - academics, and researchers. DLA works with the raw server log data, not the processed, pre-defined and selective data provided by journal publishers. It can generate types of analysis that are not generally available via proprietary web logging software because the software filters out relevant data and makes unhelpful assumptions about the meaning of the data. DLA also enables usage data to be associated with search/navigational and/or user demographic data, hence the name 'deep'. In this connection the usage of two digital journal libraries, those of Emerald Insight, and Blackwell Synergy are investigated. The information seeking behaviour of nearly three million users is analyzed in respect to the extent to which they penetrate the site, the number of visits made, as well as the type of items and content they view. The users are broken down by occupation, place of work, type of subscriber ("Big Deal", non-subscriber, etc.), geographical location, type of university (old and new), referrer link used, and number of items viewed in a session.

[1]  Zhongdong Zhang.  Evaluating electronic journals services and monitoring their usage by means of WWW server log file analysis , 1998 .

[2]  M. HamidR.Jamali,et al.  The use and users of scholarly e-journals: a review of log analysis studies , 2005, Aslib Proc..

[3]  David Nicholas,et al.  Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis , 2005, J. Documentation.

[4]  Anthony Watkinson,et al.  Digital journals, Big Deals and online searching behaviour: a pilot study , 2003, Aslib Proc..

[5]  David Nicholas,et al.  A user evaluation of subject based information gateways: case study ADAM , 2001, Aslib Proc..

[6]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Opening the digital box: what deep log analysis can tell us about our digital journal users , 2004 .

[7]  Emilio Noguera,et al.  Usability of E-Journals and Preference for the Virtual Periodicals Room: a Survey of Mathematics Faculty and Graduate Students , 2003 .

[8]  Dianne Nelson,et al.  The uptake of electronic journals by academics in the UK, their attitudes towards them and their potential impact on scholarly communication , 2001 .

[9]  Peter Williams,et al.  Digital consumer health information and advisory services in the UK: a user evaluation and sourcebook , 2004 .

[10]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Collaboratory for Research on Electronic Work. Analysis of JSTOR: The Impact on Scholarly Practice of Access to On-Line Journal Archives , 1997 .

[11]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  Patterns in Electronic Journal Usage: Challenging the Composition of Geographic Consortia , 2002 .

[12]  Oliver Obst.  Patterns and costs of printed and online journal usage. , 2003, Health information and libraries journal.

[13]  Ken Eason,et al.  Patterns of use of electronic journals , 2000, J. Documentation.

[14]  Ken Eason,et al.  The use and usefulness of functions in electronic journals: the experience of the SuperJournal Project , 2000 .

[15]  Philip M. Davis.  Information-seeking behavior of chemists: A transaction log analysis of referral URLs , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  How Electronic Journals Are Changing Patterns of Use , 2004 .

[17]  E. Smith.  Changes in Faculty Reading Behaviors: The Impact of Electronic Journals on the University of Georgia , 2003 .

[18]  Richard Ekman,et al.  Technology and scholarly communication , 1999 .

[19]  Rhian Thomas,et al.  Trends in Use of Electronic Journals in Higher Education in the UK - Views of Academic Staff and Students , 2003, D Lib Mag..

[20]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Digital libraries: Situating use in changing information infrastructure , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[21]  Panagiotis Georgiou,et al.  A user-oriented evaluation of digital libraries: case study the "electronic journals" service of the library and information service of the University of Patras, Greece , 2002, Aslib Proc..

[22]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines , 2003, J. Documentation.

[23]  David Pullinger,et al.  Electronic Journals and User Behaviour: Learning for the Future from the Superjournal Project , 2002 .

[24]  Schubert Foo,et al.  A study of graduate student end-users' use and perception of electronic journals , 2000, Online Inf. Rev..

[25]  Hao-Ren Ke,et al.  Exploring behavior of E-journal users in science and technology: Transaction log analysis of Elsevier's ScienceDirect OnSite in Taiwan , 2002 .

[26]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Electronic Journals: How User Behaviour is Changing , 2001 .

[27]  Peter Williams,et al.  Re-appraising information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: Bouncers, checkers, returnees and the like , 2004, J. Documentation.

[28]  David Nicholas,et al.  Evaluating consumer website logs: a case study of The Times/The Sunday Times website , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Philip M. Davis.  For Electronic Journals, Total Downloads Can Predict Number of Users , 2004 .

[30]  Philip M. Davis,et al.  An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry: Making inferences about user behavior , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[31]  Diann Rusch-Feja,et al.  Evaluation of Usage and Acceptance of Electronic Journals: Results of an Electronic Survey of Max Planck Society Researchers including Usage Statistics from Elsevier, Springer, and Academic Press , 1999, D Lib Mag..

[32]  Donna Harman,et al.  Information Processing and Management , 2022 .

[33]  Ann Apps,et al.  Studying E-Journal User Behavior Using Log Files , 2000 .

[34]  Patrick Teskey,et al.  The acceptance of electronic journals in UK higher education , 2001 .

[35]  Elka Tenner Mls,et al.  End-User Acceptance of Electronic Journals , 2008 .

[36]  Carol Tenopir.  Online Serials Heat Up , 2002 .

[37]  Nila A Sathe,et al.  Print versus electronic journals: a preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[38]  Rivkah K. Sass.  Marketing the Worth of Your Library. , 2002 .

[39]  Paul F. Burton,et al.  Electronic journals: a study of usage and attitudes among academics , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[40]  Paola Gargiulo.  Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy , 2003 .

[41]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies , 2003 .