3D-Printed Piezoelectric Porous Bioactive Scaffolds and Clinical Ultrasonic Stimulation Can Help in Enhanced Bone Regeneration

This paper presents a comprehensive effort to develop and analyze first-of-its-kind design-specific and bioactive piezoelectric scaffolds for treating orthopedic defects. The study has three major highlights. First, this is one of the first studies that utilize extrusion-based 3D printing to develop design-specific macroporous piezoelectric scaffolds for treating bone defects. The scaffolds with controlled pore size and architecture were synthesized based on unique composite formulations containing polycaprolactone (PCL) and micron-sized barium titanate (BaTiO3) particles. Second, the bioactive PCL-BaTiO3 piezoelectric composite formulations were explicitly developed in the form of uniform diameter filaments, which served as feedstock material for the fused filament fabrication (FFF)-based 3D printing. A combined method comprising solvent casting and extrusion (melt-blending) was designed and deemed suitable to develop the high-quality PCL-BaTiO3 bioactive composite filaments for 3D printing. Third, clinical ultrasonic stimulation (US) was used to stimulate the piezoelectric effect, i.e., create stress on the PCL-BaTiO3 scaffolds to generate electrical fields. Subsequently, we analyzed the impact of scaffold-generated piezoelectric stimulation on MC3T3 pre-osteoblast behavior. Our results confirmed that FFF could form high-resolution, macroporous piezoelectric scaffolds, and the poled PCL-BaTiO3 composites resulted in the d33 coefficient in the range of 1.2–2.6 pC/N, which is proven suitable for osteogenesis. In vitro results revealed that the scaffolds with a mean pore size of 320 µm resulted in the highest pre-osteoblast growth kinetics. While 1 Hz US resulted in enhanced pre-osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and spreading, 3 Hz US benefited osteoblast differentiation by upregulating important osteogenic markers. This study proves that 3D-printed bioactive piezoelectric scaffolds coupled with US are promising to expedite bone regeneration in orthopedic defects.

[1]  S. Bhaduri,et al.  Patient-specific 3D printed Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) dental implant system. , 2022, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[2]  P. Sikder,et al.  Fused Filament Fabrication-3D Printing of Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) Spinal Fusion Cages , 2022, Materials Letters.

[3]  P. Capparé,et al.  Full Arch Implant-Prosthetic Rehabilitation in Patients with Type I Diabetes Mellitus: Retrospective Clinical Study with 10 Year Follow-Up , 2022, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[4]  J. Owusu-Danquah,et al.  Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Porous Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) Orthopedic Scaffolds , 2022, JOM.

[5]  P. Sikder,et al.  In-house processing of 3D printable polyetheretherketone (PEEK) filaments and the effect of fused deposition modeling parameters on 3D-printed PEEK structures , 2022, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[6]  P. Sikder,et al.  A Comprehensive Analysis on the Processing-Structure-Property Relationships of Fdm-Based 3-D Printed Polyetheretherketone (Peek) Structures , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  S. Bhaduri,et al.  Influence of Fused Deposition Modelling Nozzle Temperature on the Rheology and Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed β-Tricalcium Phosphate (TCP)/Polylactic Acid (PLA) Composite , 2022, Polymers.

[8]  Jimin Chen,et al.  3D printing of porous scaffolds BaTiO3 piezoelectric ceramics and regulation of their mechanical and electrical properties , 2021, Ceramics International.

[9]  Shujun Li,et al.  In Vitro Study on the Piezodynamic Therapy with a BaTiO3-Coating Titanium Scaffold under Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Stimulation. , 2021, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[10]  Lin Wu,et al.  Improved activity of MC3T3-E1 cells by the exciting piezoelectric BaTiO3/TC4 using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound , 2021, Bioactive materials.

[11]  S. Bhaduri,et al.  Fused Filament Fabrication (Three-Dimensional Printing) of Amorphous Magnesium Phosphate/Polylactic Acid Macroporous Biocomposite Scaffolds. , 2021, ACS applied bio materials.

[12]  S. La Rocca,et al.  A simplified digital workflow for the prosthetic finishing of implant rehabilitations: a case report. , 2021, Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents.

[13]  C. Shuai,et al.  Graphene-assisted barium titanate improves piezoelectric performance of biopolymer scaffold. , 2020, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[14]  D. Khare,et al.  Electrical stimulation and piezoelectric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering applications. , 2020, Biomaterials.

[15]  Zheng Guo,et al.  Electroactive barium titanate coated titanium scaffold improves osteogenesis and osseointegration with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for large segmental bone defects , 2020, Bioactive materials.

[16]  Zheng Guo,et al.  Fabrication of piezoelectric porous BaTiO3 scaffold to repair large segmental bone defect in sheep , 2020, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[17]  M. Liberatore,et al.  Bioactive amorphous magnesium phosphate-polyetheretherketone composite filaments for 3D printing. , 2020, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  D. Vashaee,et al.  Manufacturing and characterization of mechanical, biological and dielectric properties of hydroxyapatite-barium titanate nanocomposite scaffolds , 2020, Ceramics International.

[19]  Hermann Seitz,et al.  3D Printing of Piezoelectric Barium Titanate-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Interconnected Porosity for Bone Tissue Engineering , 2020, Materials.

[20]  S. Bhaduri,et al.  Fabrication and evaluation of 3-D printed PEEK scaffolds containing Macropores by design , 2020 .

[21]  Nam-Trung Nguyen,et al.  Porous scaffolds for bone regeneration , 2020 .

[22]  M. Gardner,et al.  Translational medicine: Challenges and new orthopaedic vision (Mediouni-Model) , 2020 .

[23]  Q. Shubhra,et al.  Piezoelectric Nano‐Biomaterials for Biomedicine and Tissue Regeneration , 2020, Advanced Functional Materials.

[24]  J. Ong,et al.  Silver (Ag) doped magnesium phosphate microplatelets as next-generation antibacterial orthopedic biomaterials. , 2020, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[25]  S. Bhaduri,et al.  Processing-structure-property correlations of crystalline antibacterial magnesium phosphate (newberyite) coatings and their in vitro effect , 2019, Surface and Coatings Technology.

[26]  S. Bhaduri,et al.  Conventionally Sintered Hydroxyapatite–Barium Titanate Piezo-Biocomposites , 2019, Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals.

[27]  J. Esteve,et al.  Permanently hydrophilic, piezoelectric PVDF nanofibrous scaffolds promoting unaided electromechanical stimulation on osteoblasts. , 2019, Nanoscale.

[28]  Dongjie Jiang,et al.  Self-powered implantable electrical stimulator for osteoblasts’ proliferation and differentiation , 2019, Nano Energy.

[29]  Huaidong Jiang,et al.  Piezoelectric nylon-11 nanoparticles with ultrasound assistance for high-efficiency promotion of stem cell osteogenic differentiation. , 2019, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[30]  H. Gu,et al.  An intelligent material for tissue reconstruction: The piezoelectric property of polycaprolactone/barium titanate composites , 2019, Materials Letters.

[31]  C. Shuai,et al.  Functionalized BaTiO3 enhances piezoelectric effect towards cell response of bone scaffold. , 2019, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[32]  Eshwar Reddy Cholleti.  A Review on 3D printing of piezoelectric materials , 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

[33]  R. Liang,et al.  4D Printing based piezoelectric composite for medical applications , 2018, Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics.

[34]  Sie Chin Tjong,et al.  Graphene Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Biocompatibility, and Cytotoxicity , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[35]  I. Buj-Corral,et al.  3D Printing of Porous Scaffolds with Controlled Porosity and Pore Size Values , 2018, Materials.

[36]  V. Goel,et al.  Single-Phase, Antibacterial Trimagnesium Phosphate Hydrate Coatings on Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implants by Rapid Microwave Irradiation Technique. , 2018, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[37]  P. Sikder,et al.  Smart Injectable Self-Setting Monetite Based Bioceramics for Orthopedic Applications , 2018, Materials.

[38]  H. Madry,et al.  RETRACTED ARTICLE: A review of translational medicine. The future paradigm: how can we connect the orthopedic dots better? , 2018, Current medical research and opinion.

[39]  M. Kameda,et al.  Electrical Stimulation Enhances Migratory Ability of Transplanted Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in a Rodent Ischemic Stroke Model , 2018, Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry.

[40]  T. Webster,et al.  The Investigation of ZnO/Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Nanocomposites with Improved Mechanical, Piezoelectric, and Antimicrobial Properties for Orthopedic Applications. , 2018, Journal of biomedical nanotechnology.

[41]  Clarisse Ribeiro,et al.  In-vivo demonstration of the suitability of piezoelectric stimuli for bone reparation , 2017 .

[42]  Xuliang Deng,et al.  Built‐In Electric Fields Dramatically Induce Enhancement of Osseointegration , 2017 .

[43]  T. Trzepieciński,et al.  Synthesis of Barium Titanate Piezoelectric Ceramics for Multilayer Actuators (MLAs) , 2017 .

[44]  Michael Jaffe,et al.  Three-dimensional piezoelectric fibrous scaffolds selectively promote mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[45]  Namdev More,et al.  Piezoelectric material - A promising approach for bone and cartilage regeneration. , 2017, Medical hypotheses.

[46]  Jaume Esteve,et al.  Electromechanical Nanogenerator–Cell Interaction Modulates Cell Activity , 2017, Advanced materials.

[47]  Kang Zhao,et al.  Fabrication and in vitro biological properties of piezoelectric bioceramics for bone regeneration , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[48]  L. Qian,et al.  Polarization of an electroactive functional film on titanium for inducing osteogenic differentiation , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[49]  A. Hezma,et al.  Spectroscopic studies and thermal properties of PCL/PMMA biopolymer blend , 2016 .

[50]  Michael Jaffe,et al.  Piezoelectric materials for tissue regeneration: A review. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[51]  Kaushik Chatterjee,et al.  Perovskite ceramic nanoparticles in polymer composites for augmenting bone tissue regeneration , 2014, Nanotechnology.

[52]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Aligned porous barium titanate/hydroxyapatite composites with high piezoelectric coefficients for bone tissue engineering. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[53]  B. Park,et al.  Fabrication and characteristics of anti-inflammatory magnesium hydroxide incorporated PLGA scaffolds formed with various porogen materials , 2014, Macromolecular Research.

[54]  M. Lavine,et al.  Biomaterials. Introduction. , 2012, Science.

[55]  Leonardo Ricotti,et al.  Preparation, characterization and in vitro testing of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid/barium titanate nanoparticle composites for enhanced cellular proliferation , 2011, Biomedical microdevices.

[56]  R. Guo,et al.  Dielectric and Pyroelectric Properties of HAp-BaTiO3 Composites , 2011 .

[57]  Dong-Woo Cho,et al.  Evaluating cell proliferation based on internal pore size and 3D scaffold architecture fabricated using solid freeform fabrication technology , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[58]  I. G. Turner,et al.  Electrically Active Bioceramics: A Review of Interfacial Responses , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[59]  K. Uchino.  The Development of Piezoelectric Materials and the New Perspective , 2010 .

[60]  Min Zhao,et al.  Electrical fields in wound healing-An overriding signal that directs cell migration. , 2009, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[61]  A. Imhof,et al.  A general approach for monodisperse colloidal perovskites, Chemistry of Materials , 2009 .

[62]  Christopher R Bowen,et al.  An in vitro study of electrically active hydroxyapatite-barium titanate ceramics using Saos-2 cells , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[63]  Tzong‐Ming Wu,et al.  Isothermal crystallization kinetics and thermal behavior of poly(ɛ-caprolactone)/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites , 2007 .

[64]  J. Chaudhuri,et al.  Dielectric and piezoelectric properties of hydroxyapatite-BaTiO3 composites , 2006 .

[65]  M. Zayzafoon.  Calcium/calmodulin signaling controls osteoblast growth and differentiation , 2006, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[66]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[67]  C. McCaig,et al.  Wound healing in rat cornea: the role of electric currents , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[68]  G W Hastings,et al.  Electrical effects in bone. , 1988, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[69]  C. Andrew L. Bassett,et al.  Generation of Electric Potentials by Bone in Response to Mechanical Stress , 1962, Science.