Publications, Patents, and the Market for University Inventions

This paper examines factors that influence the likelihood of a university invention being licensed. Inventors’ prior academic output is positively correlated with the likelihood that their new technologies will be licensed, but is uncorrelated with the payments specified by the license contract or the returns of the technology to the university. This suggests that inventors’ academic status attracts the attention of potential licensees, but does not necessarily change their inferences about the quality of technologies for sale. Additionally, patent grants are associated with significant increases in the rate at which technologies are licensed and are most important for inexperienced inventors.

[1]  Alberto Di Minin,et al.  Commercializing the laboratory: the relationship between faculty patenting and publishing , 2004 .

[2]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[3]  James J. Anton,et al.  Expropriation and Inventions: Appropriable Rents in the Absence of Property Rights , 1994 .

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: assessing the importance of experience and connectivity , 2003 .

[5]  Waverly W. Ding,et al.  The Impact of Academic Patenting on the Rate, Quality and Direction of (Public) Research Output , 2009 .

[6]  Daniel W. Elfenbein,et al.  Contract Structure and Performance of Technology Transfer Agreements : Evidence from University Licenses , 2004 .

[7]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[8]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age , 1997 .

[9]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[10]  Lee G. Branstetter,et al.  Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Increase International Technology Transfer? Empirical Evidence from U.S. Firm-Level Panel Data , 2004 .

[11]  Michael R. Darby,et al.  GEOGRAPHICALLY LOCALIZED KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVERS OR MARKETS? , 1998 .

[12]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  S. Shane.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Selling University Technology: Patterns from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[14]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[15]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Disclosure and licensing of University inventions: 'The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with' , 2003 .

[16]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[17]  R. Zeckhauser.  The challenge of contracting for technological information. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  Stanley M. Besen,et al.  An Introduction to the Law and Economics of Intellectual Property , 1991 .

[19]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[20]  Moshe Buchinsky.  CHANGES IN THE U.S. WAGE STRUCTURE 1963-1987: APPLICATION OF QUANTILE REGRESSION , 1994 .

[21]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation , 2004 .

[22]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[23]  A. Arora.  Licensing Tacit Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights And The Market For Know-How , 1995 .

[24]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[25]  James J. Anton,et al.  The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Contracting , 2002 .

[26]  Jerry G. Thursby,et al.  Are There Real Effects of Licensing on Academic Research? A Life Cycle View , 2005 .

[27]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  WHO'S PATENTING IN THE UNIVERSITY? EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY OF DOCTORATE RECIPIENTS , 2007 .

[28]  Thomas Hellmann.  Entrepreneurs and the Process of Obtaining Resources , 2007 .

[29]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Management of Innovation , 1994 .

[30]  Brian D. Wright,et al.  Technology Transfer under Asymmetric Information , 1990 .

[31]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[32]  Scott Shane,et al.  The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[33]  T. Khanna,et al.  The Structure of Licensing Contracts , 2003 .

[34]  James J. Anton,et al.  The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Incomplete Contracts ∗ , 1998 .

[35]  Philip E. Auerswald.  Entrepreneurship in the Theory of the Firm , 2006 .

[36]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Are Faculty Critical? Their Role in University-Industry Licensing , 2003 .

[37]  Stakes and Stars: the Effect of Intellectual Human Capital on the Level and Variability of High-Tech Firms&Apos; Market Values , 1999 .

[38]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .