Analysis of correlation between full-waveform metrics, scan geometry and land-cover: an application over forests

Abstract. For a correct use of metrics derived from processing of the full-waveform return signal from airborne laser scanner sensors any correlation which is not related to properties of the reflecting target must be known and, if possible, removed. In the following article we report on an analysis of correlation between several metrics extracted from the full-waveform return signal and scan characteristics (mainly range) and type of land-cover (urban, grasslands, forests). The metrics taken in consideration are the amplitude, normalized amplitude, width (full width at half maximum), asymmetry indicators, left and right energy content, and the cross-section calculated from width and normalized amplitude considering the range effect. The results show that scan geometry in this case does not have a significant impact scans over forest cover, except for range affecting amplitude and width distribution. Over complex targets such as vegetation canopy, other factors such as incidence angle have little meaning, therefore corrections of range effect are the most meaningful. A strong correlation with the type of land-cover is also shown by the distribution of the values of the metrics in the different areas taken in consideration.

[1]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Radiometric Calibration of Full-waveform Small-footprint Airborne Laser Scanners , 2008 .

[2]  J. Shan,et al.  Topographic laser ranging and scanning : principles and processing , 2008 .

[3]  Uwe Soergel,et al.  A Marked Point Process for Modeling Lidar Waveforms , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  J. Reitberger,et al.  Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees , 2008 .

[5]  Frédéric Bretar,et al.  Full-waveform topographic lidar : State-of-the-art , 2009 .

[6]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[7]  Martin Rutzinger,et al.  Detection of building regions using airborne LiDAR : a new combination of raster and point cloud based GIS methods , 2009 .

[8]  R. Reulke,et al.  Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences , 2005 .

[9]  Lori A. Magruder,et al.  Landcover classification of small-footprint, full-waveform lidar data , 2009 .

[10]  Boris Jutzi,et al.  NORMALIZATION OF LIDAR INTENSITY DATA BASED ON RANGE AND SURFACE INCIDENCE ANGLE , 2009 .

[11]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  RETRIEVAL OF THE BACKSCATTER CROSS-SECTION IN FULL-WAVEFORM LIDAR DATA USING B-SPLINES , 2010 .

[12]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Uwe Stilla,et al.  Towards 3D mapping of forests: A comparative study with first/last pulse and full waveform LiDAR data , 2008 .

[14]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Urban vegetation detection using radiometrically calibrated small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data , 2012 .

[15]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[16]  Tomas Brandtberg.  Classifying individual tree species under leaf-off and leaf-on conditions using airborne lidar , 2007 .

[17]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Forest Delineation Based on Airborne LIDAR Data , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Object-Based Point Cloud Analysis of Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Urban Vegetation Classification , 2008, Sensors.

[19]  Robert Nowak,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Full-Waveform Lidar Algorithms , 2011 .