From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience

Interactive immersive entertainment, or videogame playing, has emerged as a major entertainment and educational medium. As research and development initiatives proliferate, educational researchers might benefit by developing more grounded theories about them. This article argues for framing game play as a designed experience. Players’ understandings are developed through cycles of performance within the gameworlds, which instantiate particular theories of the world (ideological worlds). Players develop new identities both through game play and through the gaming communities in which these identities are enacted. Thus research that examines game-based learning needs to account for both kinds of interactions within the game-world and in broader social contexts. Examples from curriculum developed for Civilization III and Supercharged! show how games can communicate powerful ideas and open new identity trajectories for learners.

[1]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[2]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Experience and Education. , 1974 .

[3]  M. Apple.  Ideology and the Curriculum , 1981 .

[4]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Paul R. Thompson.  AUTHOR! , 1982, The Lancet.

[6]  D. Sharp.  British Broadcasting Corporation , 1984 .

[7]  Chris Crawford,et al.  The Art of Computer Game Design , 1984 .

[8]  E. Mitchell.  The Dynamics of Family Interaction Around Home Video Games , 1985 .

[9]  Christopher Spencer,et al.  Learning a new area with and without the use of tactile maps: a comparative study , 1985 .

[10]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  THE MIND'S EYE IN CHESS , 1988 .

[11]  Eugene F. Provenzo,et al.  Video Kids: Making Sense of Nintendo , 1991 .

[12]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[13]  David Sheff,et al.  Game over: how Nintendo zapped an American industry, captured your dollars, and enslaved your children , 1993 .

[14]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  Gender Swapping on the Internet , 1993 .

[15]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[16]  B. Asher.  The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[17]  E. Hutchins.  Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[18]  J. Casti.  Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science , 1996 .

[19]  Michael J. Berson.  Effectiveness of Computer Technology in the Social Studies: A Review of the Literature , 1996 .

[20]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[21]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[22]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[23]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Interaction and grammar: “When I come down I'm in the domain state”: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists , 1996 .

[24]  Karen Milton,et al.  A Renaissance of the Renaissance--Using HyperStudio for Research Projects. , 1996 .

[25]  Warren C. Hope.  It's Time to Transform Social Studies Teaching , 1996 .

[26]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Interaction and grammar: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[27]  I. McMillan,et al.  Changing Minds , 2000 .

[28]  Kenneth D. Forbus.  Using Qualitative Physics to Create Articulate Educational Software , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[29]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[30]  Barbara S. Page.  Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[31]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Principles of Self-Organization: Learning as Participation in Autocatakinetic Systems , 1999 .

[32]  P. Hakkarainen.  Perspectives on activity theory: Play and motivation , 1999 .

[33]  L. E. Leidy,et al.  Guns, germs and steel: The fates of human societies , 1999 .

[34]  J. Hagan,et al.  Children and Electronic Games: A Comparison of Parents' and Children's Perceptions of Children's Habits and Preferences in a United States Sample , 1999, Psychological reports.

[35]  Michael Leyton,et al.  Theory of Design , 2001 .

[36]  Edward Castronova,et al.  Virtual Worlds: A First-Hand Account of Market and Society on the Cyberian Frontier , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[37]  Peter Comber,et al.  BBC News Online , 2002 .

[38]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Cultural Framing of Computer/Video Games , 2002, Game Stud..

[39]  A. McFarlane,et al.  Report on the educational use of games , 2002 .

[40]  P. Humphreys.  Convergence: The Journal of Research into New Media Technologies , 2002 .

[41]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[42]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Video games in education , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Games Simul..

[43]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Design Principles of Next-Generation Digital Gaming for Education. , 2003 .

[44]  Sherry Turkle.  From Powerful Ideas to PowerPoint , 2003 .

[45]  Navigating World History: Historians Create a Global past , 2003 .

[46]  K. Squire,et al.  HARNESSING THE POWER OF GAMES IN EDUCATION , 2003 .

[47]  R. Beck.  Navigating World History: Historians Create A Global Past , 2003 .

[48]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  The Video Game Lightning Rod , 2003 .

[49]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[50]  David Leheny.  The Rules of Play , 2003 .

[51]  Mark R. Mine,et al.  Building a massively multiplayer game for the million: Disney's Toontown Online , 2003, CIE.

[52]  Cory Ondrejka.  Living on the Edge: Digital Worlds Which Embrace the Real World , 2004 .

[53]  John C. Beck,et al.  Got Game: How the Gamer Generation Is Reshaping Business Forever , 2004 .

[54]  D. Shaffer.  Pedagogical Praxis: The Professions as Models for Postindustrial Education , 2004, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[55]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Learning in Massively Multiplayer Online Games , 2004, ICLS.

[56]  안태경.  Social Science Research Network , 2005 .

[57]  Rebecca W. Black.  Access and Affiliation: The Literacy and Composition Practices of English‐Language Learners in an Online Fanfiction Community , 2005 .

[58]  Katie Salen,et al.  The Game Design Reader: A Rules of Play Anthology , 2005 .

[59]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Educating the fighter: buttonmashing, seeing, being , 2005 .

[60]  Steven Johnson,et al.  Everything Bad Is Good for You , 2005 .

[61]  Rebecca W. Black,et al.  Researching literacy as tool, place, and way of being , 2005 .

[62]  J. Gee.  Why Video Games Are Good for Your Soul: Pleasure and Learning , 2005 .

[63]  J. Gee,et al.  Video Games and the Future of Learning , 2005 .

[64]  Clark Aldrich,et al.  Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences , 2005 .

[65]  Kieran Walsh,et al.  Everything bad is good for you , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[66]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Fostering Scientific Habits of Mind in the Context of Online Play , 2006, ICLS.

[67]  M. Cole,et al.  Cultural Historical Activity Theory and the Expansion of Opportunities for Learning After School , 2008 .

[68]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Environmental Detectives—the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations , 2008 .