Three-Dimensional Map of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Detachment

Abstract Purpose To develop, validate, and apply a neural network for quantification of endothelial corneal graft detachment using anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Design Training and validation of a neural network and application within a prospective cohort. Participants Patients two weeks after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Methods Investigators manually labeled the posterior cornea and the graft in cross-sectional images of rotational AS-OCT scans in the training and validation set. Neural networks for image segmentation were trained to identify the area of graft detachment on cross-sectional images. The best-performing neural network with the lowest misclassification (Youden index) and highest spatial overlap with the ground truth (Dice coefficient) was selected and evaluated in a separate dataset. Three-dimensional maps of the area and volume of graft detachment were calculated. For application, the neural network’s rating on the percent detachment was compared with slit-lamp-based ratings of cornea specialists on the same day as the AS-OCT took place. Main Outcome Measures Youden index and Dice coefficient. Results Neural networks were trained on 27 AS-OCT scans with 6912 labeled images. Among 48 combinations of probability thresholds and epoch states, the best-performing neural network had a Youden index of 0.99 with a Dice coefficient of 0.78, indicating low misclassification and good spatial overlap on individual image segmentation. In the validation set unknown to the neural network with 20 scans (5120 images), the Youden index was 0.85 with a Dice coefficient of 0.73, and a high overall performance compared to the manually-labeled ground truth (R2 = 0.90). In the application set with 107 eyes, the neural network estimated the mean percent detachment larger than the cornea specialist (mean difference, 8.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 6.2–10.2). Masked review of 42 AS-OCTs with more than ±10 percentage points difference in ratings showed that clinician underestimated the true detachment in cases with significant detachment requiring intervention. Conclusions Deep learning-based segmentation of AS-OCT images quantified the percent and the volume of DMEK graft detachment with high precision. Fully automated three-dimensional quantification of graft detachment is highly sensitive, particularly in corneas with a significant amount of detachment, and may support decision making.

[1]  Jack Bresenham,et al.  Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter , 1965, IBM Syst. J..

[2]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[3]  F. Price,et al.  Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five‐year follow‐up , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  S. Chaurasia,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined With Epithelial Debridement and Mitomycin-C Application for Fuchs Dystrophy With Preoperative Subepithelial Fibrosis or Anterior Basement Membrane Dystrophy , 2014, Cornea.

[5]  Mitko Veta,et al.  Quantifying Graft Detachment after Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks , 2020, Translational vision science & technology.

[6]  E. Agrón,et al.  Retinal Specialist versus Artificial Intelligence Detection of Retinal Fluid from OCT , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[7]  N. Congdon,et al.  Real-Time Imaging of Incision-Related Descemet Membrane Detachment During Cataract Surgery , 2020, JAMA ophthalmology.

[8]  M. Walland Detachment of Descemet’s Membrane , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[9]  A. Agarwal,et al.  A new clinico-tomographic classification and management algorithm for Descemet's membrane detachment. , 2015, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[10]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Prevention and management of graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Taher K Eleiwa,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of 3-Dimensional Thickness of the Endothelium-Descemet Complex in Fuchs' Endothelial Cell Corneal Dystrophy. , 2020, Ophthalmology.

[12]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[13]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning , 2019, Journal of Big Data.

[14]  T. Reinhard,et al.  Vertical Scrolling Axis of Corneal Endothelial Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2020, Cornea.

[15]  Mackool Rj,et al.  Descemet membrane detachment. , 1977, Archives of ophthalmology.

[16]  Nima Tajbakhsh,et al.  UNet++: Redesigning Skip Connections to Exploit Multiscale Features in Image Segmentation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Daniel B. Zander,et al.  Rotational alignment of corneal endothelial grafts and risk of graft detachment after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a double‐masked pseudo‐randomized study , 2021, Acta ophthalmologica.

[18]  R. Jain,et al.  Outcomes of repeat descemetopexy in post-cataract surgery descemet membrane detachment. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[19]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[20]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[21]  N. Gerber-Hollbach,et al.  Influence of Intraoperative Air Tamponade Time on Graft Adherence in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2018, Cornea.

[22]  Sebastian Siebelmann,et al.  Detection of graft detachments immediately following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing time domain and spectral domain OCT , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[23]  V. Polo,et al.  Evaluation of Early Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography , 2016, Cornea.

[24]  M. Treder,et al.  Using Deep Learning in Automated Detection of Graft Detachment in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Pilot Study , 2018, Cornea.

[25]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[26]  Leopold Schmetterer,et al.  Anterior segment optical coherence tomography , 2018, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[27]  I. Dapena,et al.  Predictive value of optical coherence tomography in graft attachment after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[28]  Anthony N Kuo,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[29]  Kyros Moutsouris,et al.  Optical Coherence Tomography, Scheimpflug Imaging, and Slit-Lamp Biomicroscopy in the Early Detection of Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[30]  B. Winkens,et al.  Rebubbling and graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a prospective Dutch registry study , 2021, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[31]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Height‐, extent‐, length‐, and pupil‐based (HELP) algorithm to manage post‐phacoemulsification Descemet membrane detachment , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[32]  C. Cursiefen,et al.  The Cologne rebubbling study: a reappraisal of 624 rebubblings after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty , 2020, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[33]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[34]  D. Meisler,et al.  A combined technique for surgical repair of Descemet's membrane detachments. , 2006, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[35]  Daniel B. Zander,et al.  Predicting Edema Resolution After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Dystrophy Using Scheimpflug Tomography. , 2021, JAMA ophthalmology.