Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use

Purpose: The aim was to investigate outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use regarding need for assistance when moving around, frequency of mobility-related participation, easiness/difficulty in mobility during participation, and number of participation aspects performed in everyday life. Method: The study was a prospective cohort study, using an instrument focusing on mobility-related participation outcomes of mobility device interventions (NOMO 1.0), at baseline, after 4-months and 1-year use. Results: The results show that the outcomes in terms of participation frequency and easiness in mobility occur in a short time perspective, and that the effects remained stable at 1-year follow-up. The frequency of going for a walk increased most prominently (26%). Even though the majority of the participation aspects were not performed, more often they became easier to perform: 56–91% found that shopping, walking and visiting family/friends were easier. Moreover, independence outdoors and indoors increased. Conclusions: This small study provides knowledge about the outcomes of powered wheelchairs and scooters in terms of mobility and mobility-related participation in real-life situations. The study supports results from former studies, but even so, larger studies are required in order to provide evidence for the effectiveness of powered wheelchairs and scooters. Implications for Rehabilitation Powered wheelchair and scoter interventions increased independence in mobility and easiness in mobility-related participation in everyday life. Easiness in participation can be considered an important follow-up dimension after powered wheelchair and scooter interventions. A 4-month follow-up time after powered wheelchair and scooter intervention seems adequate.

[1]  J. Ware SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide , 2003 .

[2]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Towards an instrument targeting mobility-related participation: Nordic cross-national reliability. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  François Routhier,et al.  Impact of wheelchair acquisition on social participation , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[4]  Luc Noreau,et al.  Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in the Netherlands , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[6]  A. Frank,et al.  Young people's experiences using electric powered indoor – outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): Potential for enhancing users' development? , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[7]  P. Houben Changing Housing for Elderly People and Co-ordination Issues in Europe , 2001 .

[8]  恵子 紀国谷 国際生活機能分類(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF)にみた福祉・保健・医療の専門職協働における連携に関する貢献と課題 , 2007 .

[9]  Marcus J Fuhrer,et al.  Assessing the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology interventions for enhancing mobility , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[10]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Research Design in Clinical Psychology , 2021 .

[11]  A. Frank,et al.  Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[13]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  Social participation attenuates decline in perceptual speed in old and very old age. , 2005, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Gary Kielhofner,et al.  Model of human occupation : theory and application , 1985 .

[15]  Jennifer Balfour,et al.  Just Get Out the Door! Importance of Walking Outside the Home for Maintaining Mobility: Findings from the Women's Health and Aging Study , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  Renzo Andrich,et al.  IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision , 2001 .

[17]  Vienna Lecture,et al.  ON THE EUROPEAN UNION , 2010 .

[18]  I. Pettersson,et al.  The Value of an Outdoor Powered Wheelchair With Regard to the Quality of Life of Persons With Stroke: A Follow-Up Study , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[19]  Dimitris Michailakis,et al.  Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities , 1995, Human Rights and Disabled Persons.

[20]  I. Pettersson,et al.  Lifeworld Perspectives Utilizing Assistive Devices: Individuals, Lived Experience following a Stroke , 2006, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[21]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  Powered Mobility for Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Systematic Review of Outcomes and Appraisal of Published Evidence , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[22]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  A. Frank,et al.  Older adults' use of, and satisfaction with, electric powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[24]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[25]  H Nazirah,et al.  THE APPLICATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH (ICF) BY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(WHO) IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE PRACTICE , 2007 .

[26]  Peter R. Giacobbi,et al.  Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[27]  M. T. J. Buñuales,et al.  La clasificación internacional del funcionamiento de la discapacidad y de la salud (CIF) 2001 , 2002 .

[28]  V. Freedman,et al.  Factors Influencing the Use of Mobility Technology in Community-Based Long-Term Care , 2004, Journal of aging and health.