Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Coherent motion responses of patients with mild to moderate strabismic amblyopia were compared to those of normals using visual-evoked potentials (VEPs). Responses were elicited by dynamic random-dot kinematograms that alternated at 0.83 Hz between globally coherent (left-right) and incoherent (random) motion states. Tuning curves were measured at the first harmonic of the global motion update rate (0.83 Hz) and at the first harmonic of the dot update rate (20 Hz) for spatial displacements 3.1 to 27.9 arcmin (1.6 to 9.3 deg/s). Responses locked to the changes in the global organization of the local direction vectors were an inverted U-shaped function of displacement/speed in the normal-vision observers and in the fellow eyes of the strabismus patients while the tuning function of the amblyopic eyes was shifted to larger displacements/higher speeds. Responses at the dot update rate were reduced in amplitude and altered in timing in both eyes of the patients. The results are consistent with both local and global deficits in motion processing in strabismic amblyopia.

[1]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  Integration of local motion is normal in amblyopia. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  中村 元 Human V5 demonstrated by magnetoencephalography using random dot kinematograms of different coherence levels , 2006 .

[3]  C. Duffy,et al.  Neurophysiological and perceptual correlates of navigational impairment in Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[5]  L. Kiorpes Visual Processing in Amblyopia: Animal Studies , 2006, Strabismus.

[6]  B. Mansouri,et al.  The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  A. Engel,et al.  High-frequency activity in human visual cortex is modulated by visual motion strength. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Human cortical response to incoherent motion on a background of coherent motion , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[9]  Ilona Kovács,et al.  A new test of contour integration deficits in patients with a history of disrupted binocular experience during visual development , 2000, Vision Research.

[10]  K. Ohtsuka,et al.  Topographical analysis of motion-triggered visual-evoked potentials in man. , 1999, Japanese journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Peter A. Tass,et al.  Timing of V1/V2 and V5+ activations during coherent motion of dots: An MEG study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[13]  Michael Niedeggen,et al.  Motion evoked brain potentials parallel the consistency of coherent motion perception in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  The global processing deficit in amblyopia involves noise segregation , 2006, Vision Research.

[15]  H Suzuki,et al.  Human cortical area responding to stimuli in apparent motion , 1997, Neuroreport.

[16]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Neuromagnetic correlates of visual motion coherence , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  A. Norcia,et al.  An adaptive filter for steady-state evoked responses. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[18]  H. Remschmidt,et al.  Visual evoked potentials elicited by coherently moving dots in dyslexic children , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  Separate Processing of Different Global-Motion Structures in Visual Cortex Is Revealed by fMRI , 2005, Current Biology.

[20]  T. Buckingham,et al.  Hyperacuity Thresholds for Oscillatory Movement are Abnormal in Strabismic and Anisometropic Amblyopes , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[21]  G. Comi,et al.  IFCN standards for digital recording of clinical EEG. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[22]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[23]  文堂 昌彦 Human Visual Motion Areas Determined Individually by Magnetoencephalography and 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000 .

[24]  R. Hess,et al.  A reduced motion aftereffect in strabismic amblyopia , 1997, Vision Research.

[25]  Kenneth J. Ciuffreda,et al.  AMBLYOPIA: BASIC AND CLINICAL ASPECTS , 1991 .

[26]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Nishida,et al.  Contrast Sensitivity of the Motion System , 1996, Vision Research.

[28]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Is the motion system relatively spared in amblyopia? Evidence from cortical evoked responses , 1996, Vision Research.

[29]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Liu Hongting Contour Integration Deficits in Anisometropic Amblyopia , 2010 .

[31]  L. Kiorpes,et al.  Contour integration in amblyopic monkeys , 2003, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Movshon,et al.  The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Norcia,et al.  Validation study of VEP vernier acuity in normal-vision and amblyopic adults. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  R. Hess,et al.  Motion sensitivity and spatial undersampling in amblyopia , 1993, Vision Research.

[35]  E. Halgren,et al.  Early discrimination of coherent versus incoherent motion by multiunit and synaptic activity in human putative MT+ , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions , 1984, Vision Research.

[37]  S Celebrini,et al.  Microstimulation of extrastriate area MST influences performance on a direction discrimination task. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional Modulation of Motion Integration of Individual Neurons in the Middle Temporal Visual Area , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Hyperacuity and amblyopia , 1982, Nature.

[40]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[41]  O. Braddick,et al.  Brain Areas Sensitive to Coherent Visual Motion , 2001, Perception.

[42]  D. Regan,et al.  Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  Catherine Boden,et al.  Deficient motion perception in the fellow eye of amblyopic children , 2005, Vision Research.

[44]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  The representation of global spatial structure in amblyopia , 2004, Vision Research.

[45]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration in strabismic amblyopia: The sufficiency of an explanation based on positional uncertainty , 1997, Vision Research.

[46]  D. Giaschi,et al.  Deficient maximum motion displacement in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[47]  R. Kakigi,et al.  Magnetic response of human extrastriate cortex in the detection of coherent and incoherent motion , 2000, Neuroscience.

[48]  Robert F Hess,et al.  A residual deficit for global motion processing after acuity recovery in deprivation amblyopia. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[49]  J. Movshon,et al.  Sensitivity to visual motion in amblyopic macaque monkeys , 2006, Visual Neuroscience.

[50]  Ryusuke Kakigi,et al.  Human cortical responses to coherent and incoherent motion as measured by magnetoencephalography , 2002, Neuroscience Research.

[51]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The influences of visibility and anomalous integration processes on the perception of global spatial form versus motion in human amblyopia , 2005, Vision Research.

[52]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Opposite dependencies on visual motion coherence in human area MT+ and early visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[53]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Influence of contrast on foveal and peripheral detection of coherent motion in moving random-dot patterns. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[54]  S. Treue,et al.  The response of neurons in areas V1 and MT of the alert rhesus monkey to moving random dot patterns , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  D. Maurer,et al.  Better perception of global motion after monocular than after binocular deprivation , 2002, Vision Research.

[56]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity to motion signals in extrastriate area MST of the macaque monkey , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[57]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal responses in macaque MT and VIP during motion detection , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  R. Hess,et al.  Contour integration in anisometropic amblyopia , 1998, Vision Research.

[59]  H. Keselman,et al.  The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. , 2001, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[60]  J Anthony Movshon,et al.  The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[61]  M Niedeggen,et al.  Characteristics of visual evoked potentials generated by motion coherence onset. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[62]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Visual Processing in Amblyopia: Human Studies , 2006, Strabismus.