Gender, culture, and mathematics performance

Using contemporary data from the U.S. and other nations, we address 3 questions: Do gender differences in mathematics performance exist in the general population? Do gender differences exist among the mathematically talented? Do females exist who possess profound mathematical talent? In regard to the first question, contemporary data indicate that girls in the U.S. have reached parity with boys in mathematics performance, a pattern that is found in some other nations as well. Focusing on the second question, studies find more males than females scoring above the 95th or 99th percentile, but this gender gap has significantly narrowed over time in the U.S. and is not found among some ethnic groups and in some nations. Furthermore, data from several studies indicate that greater male variability with respect to mathematics is not ubiquitous. Rather, its presence correlates with several measures of gender inequality. Thus, it is largely an artifact of changeable sociocultural factors, not immutable, innate biological differences between the sexes. Responding to the third question, we document the existence of females who possess profound mathematical talent. Finally, we review mounting evidence that both the magnitude of mean math gender differences and the frequency of identification of gifted and profoundly gifted females significantly correlate with sociocultural factors, including measures of gender equality across nations.

[1]  M. Murray Pioneering Women in American Mathematics: The Pre-1940 PhD's , 2010 .

[2]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.

[3]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The development of sex differences , 1966 .

[4]  E. Fennema,et al.  Gender differences in mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[6]  Titu Andreescu,et al.  Cross-cultural analysis of students with exceptional talent in mathematical problem solving , 2008 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Kathleen J. Roth,et al.  What Science Teaching Looks Like: An International Perspective. , 2007 .

[9]  N. Augustine Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future , 2006 .

[10]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  Culture, Gender, and Math , 2008, Science.

[11]  Laura D'Andrea Tyson,et al.  The global gender gap report , 2006 .

[12]  Kelsey E. Medeiros,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers : Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[13]  E. Spelke Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science?: a critical review. , 2005, The American psychologist.

[14]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering , 2007 .

[15]  Stephen Machin,et al.  Global Sex Differences in Test Score Variability , 2008, Science.

[16]  W. Russell Teachers College Record , 1930, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices , 1994 .

[18]  Catherine J. Weinberger Is the Science and Engineering Workforce Drawn from the Far Upper Tail of the Math Ability Distribution ? , 2005 .

[19]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[20]  William G. Vanderbok The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2005 .

[21]  S. Shields Functionalism, Darwinism, and the Psychology of Women , 1975 .

[22]  Andrew M. Penner,et al.  Gender Differences in Extreme Mathematical Achievement: An International Perspective on Biological and Social Factors1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  Donna J. Nelson,et al.  A NATIONAL ANALYSIS OF DIVERSITY IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING FACULTIES AT RESEARCH UNIVERSITIES , 2005 .

[24]  Ray Bert,et al.  Book Review: \IThe World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century\N by Thomas L. Friedman. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005 , 2006 .

[25]  J. Stanley,et al.  Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts. , 1983, Science.

[26]  David P. Baker,et al.  Creating Gender Equality: Cross-National Gender Stratification and Mathematical Performance. , 1993 .

[27]  L. Hedges,et al.  Gender Differences in Variability in Intellectual Abilities: A Reanalysis of Feingold’s Results , 1993 .

[28]  D. Murphey,et al.  The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century , 2006 .

[29]  Wayne Au,et al.  High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis , 2007 .

[30]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[31]  Amy M. Hightower,et al.  Science and Engineering Indicators , 1993 .

[32]  PublicPolicy COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, ENGINEERING, AND PUBLIC POLICY , 1998 .

[33]  Linda E. Brody,et al.  Talent search research: what have we learned? , 2005 .

[34]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance , 2008, Science.

[35]  R. Hambleton National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) , 2009 .

[36]  J. Meece,et al.  Sex Differences in Math Achievement: Toward a Model of Academic Choice. , 1982 .