Design and validation of an improved graphical user interface with the 'Tool ball'.

The purpose of this research is introduce the design of an improved graphical user interface (GUI) and verifies the operational efficiency of the proposed interface. Until now, clicking the toolbar with the mouse is the usual way to operate software functions. In our research, we designed an improved graphical user interface - a tool ball that is operated by a mouse wheel to perform software functions. Several experiments are conducted to measure the time needed to operate certain software functions with the traditional combination of "mouse click + tool button" and the proposed integration of "mouse wheel + tool ball". The results indicate that the tool ball design can accelerate the speed of operating software functions, decrease the number of icons on the screen, and enlarge the applications of the mouse wheel.

[1]  Hongan Wang,et al.  Tilt menu: using the 3D orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces , 2008, CHI.

[2]  Chris W Clegg,et al.  Assessing the value of human factors initiatives. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Gilles Bailly,et al.  Flower menus: a new type of marking menu with large menu breadth, within groups and efficient expert mode memorization , 2008, AVI '08.

[4]  Andreas Sonderegger,et al.  The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Arne Aarås,et al.  An Ergonomic Field Comparison of a Traditional Computer Mouse and a Vertical Computer Mouse in Uninjured Office Workers , 2000 .

[6]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of Some Articulatory and Cognitive Aspects of Marking Menus , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Testing the technology acceptance model across cultures: A three country study , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  An empirical comparison of menu-selection (CUI) and desktop (GUI) computer programs carried out by beginners and experts , 1992 .

[10]  Don Hopkins,et al.  The design and implementation of pie menus , 1991 .

[11]  Tuomas Vaittinen,et al.  Design issues related to pie menus for 5-way joysticks , 2007, Mobility '07.

[12]  James M. Laffey,et al.  Understanding Usability and User Experience of Web-Based 3D Graphics Technology , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  M Fogleman,et al.  Computer mouse use and cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremities. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[14]  Hans van der Heijden,et al.  Factors influencing the usage of websites: the case of a generic portal in The Netherlands , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  User interface directions for the Web , 1999, CACM.

[16]  P. Johnson,et al.  Physical exposure differences between children and adults when using standard and small computer input devices , 2008, Ergonomics.

[17]  Paul K. Wright,et al.  Toolglasses, Marking Menus, and Hotkeys: A Comparison of One and Two-Handed Command Selection Techniques , 2004, Graphics Interface.

[18]  M. Weiser,et al.  An empirical comparison of pie vs. linear menus , 1988, CHI '88.

[19]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Earpod: eyes-free menu selection using touch input and reactive audio feedback , 2007, CHI.

[20]  Paul Atkinson.  The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men: The Computer Mouse in the History of Computing , 2007, Design Issues.

[21]  Alex Chaparro,et al.  The Effects of Selection Technique on Target Acquisition Movements Made with a Mouse , 1998 .

[22]  Angela Lin,et al.  The acceptance and use of a business-to-business information system , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing to Facilitate Browsing: A Look Back at the Hyperties Workstation Browser , 1991, Hypermedia.

[24]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  Fong-Gong Wu,et al.  Design and evaluation approach for increasing stability and performance of touch pens in screen handwriting tasks. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  William Buxton,et al.  The limits of expert performance using hierarchic marking menus , 1993, INTERCHI.

[27]  William Buxton,et al.  User learning and performance with marking menus , 1994, CHI 1994.

[28]  Marco Porta,et al.  Vision-based user interfaces: methods and applications , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[29]  Lajos Kollár.  GUIML, creating dynamic GUI objects using XML , 2003 .

[30]  Jin-Sung Kim,et al.  Exploring the user interface of negotiation support systems from the user acceptance perspective , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Patrick Patterson,et al.  Usability of pointing devices for office applications in a moving off-road environment. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  B. Schneirdeman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[33]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of on-line tax: An empirical study , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[35]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[36]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Changes in applied force to a touchpad during pointing tasks , 2002 .

[37]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[38]  Ralph Kimball,et al.  Designing the Star user interface (1982) , 1989 .

[39]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity , 1999 .

[40]  Yung-Hui Lee,et al.  Design and validation of a desk-free and posture-independent input device. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[41]  D. Rempel,et al.  Effects of computer mouse design and task on carpal tunnel pressure. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[42]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Which interaction technique works when?: floating palettes, marking menus and toolglasses support different task strategies , 2002, AVI '02.

[43]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Exploring the emotional, aesthetic, and ergonomic facets of innovative product on fashion technology acceptance model , 2009, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[44]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  CPN/Tools: A Post-WIMP Interface for Editing and Simulating Coloured Petri Nets , 2001, ICATPN.

[45]  Jack T Dennerlein,et al.  Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[46]  B. Schneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface. Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1992 .