Self-potential observations during hydraulic fracturing

Self-Potential Observations During Hydraulic Fracturing Jeffrey R. Moore Steven D. Glaser University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering 760 Davis Hall Berkeley, CA USA E-mail: moore@ce.berkeley.edu Abstract The self-potential (SP) response during hydraulic fracturing of intact Sierra granite was investigated in the laboratory. Excellent correlation of pressure drop and SP suggests that the SP response is created primarily by electrokinetic coupling. For low pressures, the variation of SP with pressure drop is linear, indicating a constant coupling coefficient (Cc) of -200 mV/MPa. However for pressure drops >2 MPa, the magnitude of the Cc increases by 80% in an exponential trend. This increasing Cc is related to increasing permeability at high pore pressures caused by dilatancy of micro-cracks, and is explained by a decrease in the hydraulic tortuosity. Resistivity measurements reveal a decrease of 2% prior to hydraulic fracturing and a decrease of ~35% after fracturing. An asymmetric spatial SP response created by injectate diffusion into dilatant zones is observed prior to hydraulic fracturing, and in most cases this SP variation revealed the impending crack geometry seconds before failure. At rupture, injectate rushes into the new fracture area where the zeta potential is different than in the rock porosity, and an anomalous SP spike is observed. After fracturing, the spatial SP distribution reveals the direction of fracture propagation. Finally, during tensile cracking in a point load device with no water flow, a SP spike is observed that is caused by contact electrification. However, the time constant of this event is much less than that for transients observed during hydraulic fracturing, suggesting that SP created solely from material fracture does not contribute to the SP response during hydraulic fracturing. 1. Introduction Hydraulic fracturing creates a network of tensile fractures in low-permeability reservoir rock by introducing high fluid pressures at depth in a borehole. Permeability Moore and Glaser, in press JGR, B – 2006JB004373

[1]  T. Ishido,et al.  Electrokinetic phenomena associated with earthquakes , 1976 .

[2]  M. Middleton,et al.  Measurements of streaming potential versus applied pressure for porous rocks , 1997 .

[3]  W. Brace,et al.  Electrical resistivity changes in saturated rocks during fracture and frictional sliding , 1968 .

[4]  D. Lockner,et al.  Changes in complex resistivity during creep in granite , 1986 .

[5]  Shingo Yoshida,et al.  Convection current generated prior to rupture in saturated rocks , 2001 .

[6]  J. Avouac,et al.  Streaming potential measurements 2. Relationship between electrical and hydraulic flow patterns from rock samples during deformation , 1999 .

[7]  H. Morrison,et al.  Earth resistivity, self potential variations, and earthquakes: A negative result for M = 4.0 , 1979 .

[8]  M. Zoback,et al.  The effect of microcrack dilatancy on the permeability of westerly granite , 1975 .

[9]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  Further investigation of the surface charge properties of oxide surfaces in oil-bearing sands and sandstones , 1987 .

[10]  U. Nitsan,et al.  Electromagnetic emission accompanying fracture of quartz-bearing rocks , 1977 .

[11]  A. Revil,et al.  A triple-layer model of the surface electrochemical properties of clay minerals. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  R. Corwin,et al.  The self-potential method in geothermal exploration , 1979 .

[13]  J. Bernaix.  New laboratory methods of studying the mechanical properties of rocks , 1969 .

[14]  P. Sailhac,et al.  Surface electric variations induced by deep hydraulic stimulation: An example from the Soultz HDR site , 2002, Geophysical Research Letters.

[15]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  Permeability of granite under high pressure , 1968 .

[16]  A. Rabinovitch,et al.  An analysis of complex electromagnetic radiation signals induced by fracture , 2003 .

[17]  Fundamentals of streaming potentials in geophysics: Laboratory methods , 1989 .

[18]  Yun Lin,et al.  Stress–strain–electrical resistance effects and associated state equations for uniaxial rock compression , 2004 .

[19]  C. Mann,et al.  Electrical properties of eolian sand and silt , 1994 .

[20]  André Revil,et al.  Streaming potential in porous media: 2. Theory and application to geothermal systems , 1999 .

[21]  L. Onsager.  Reciprocal Relations in Irreversible Processes. II. , 1931 .

[22]  J. A. Franklin,et al.  Suggested method for determining point load strength , 1985 .

[23]  M. Pessel,et al.  Electroosmotic flow and the validity of the classical Darcy equation in silty shales , 2002 .

[24]  P. Sammonds,et al.  Electric potential changes prior to shear fracture in dry and saturated rocks , 1998 .

[25]  Philippe Labazuy,et al.  The volcano‐electric effect , 2003 .

[26]  John W. Pritchett,et al.  Hydrofracture Characterization Using Downhole Electrical Monitoring , 2005 .

[27]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  The streaming potential of liquid carbon dioxide in Berea sandstone , 2004 .

[28]  Shingo Yoshida,et al.  Electric potential changes associated with slip failure of granite: Preseismic and coseismic signals , 1997 .

[29]  S. T. Martner,et al.  THE ELECTROSEISMIC EFFECT , 1959 .

[30]  T. Madden,et al.  The effect of pressure on the electrical resistivity of water‐saturated crystalline rocks , 1965 .

[31]  Marian Smoluchowski,et al.  Contribution à la théorie de l'endosmose électrique et de quelques phénomènes corrélatifs , 1924 .

[32]  Frank Dale Morgan,et al.  Electrokinetic dissipation induced by seismic waves , 1991 .

[33]  P. Reppert,et al.  Temperature-dependent streaming potentials: 2. Laboratory , 2003 .

[34]  T. R. Meyer,et al.  Radio emission associated with rock fracture: Possible application to the Great Chilean Earthquake of May 22, 1960 , 1982 .

[35]  B. T. Brady,et al.  Laboratory investigation of the electrodynamics of rock fracture , 1986, Nature.

[36]  J. Avouac,et al.  Streaming potential measurements 1. Properties of the electrical double layer from crushed rock samples , 1999 .

[37]  M. Gokhberg,et al.  Experimental measurement of electromagnetic emissions possibly related to earthquakes in Japan , 1982 .

[38]  H. F. Morrison,et al.  Self-potential variations preceding earthquakes in central california , 1977 .

[39]  P. Varotsos,et al.  Prediction of the 6.6 Grevena-Kozani earthquake of May 13, 1995 , 1999 .

[40]  Philip H. Nelson,et al.  Well logging for physical properties , 1985 .

[41]  Laurence Jouniaux,et al.  Streaming potential and permeability of saturated sandstones under triaxial stress: Consequences for electrotelluric anomalies prior to earthquakes , 1995 .

[42]  M. Johnston,et al.  A mechanism to explain the generation of earthquake lights , 1983, Nature.

[43]  R. Paillot.  M. SMOLUCHOWSKI. — Contribution à la théorie de l'endosmose électrique et de quelques phénomènes corrélatifs (Bulletin de l'Académie des Sciences de Cracovie; mars 1903) , 1904 .

[44]  J. Shlyapobersky,et al.  Active and passive imaging of hydraulic fractures , 1992 .

[45]  Hideki Mizunaga,et al.  Reservoir monitoring by a 4-D electrical technique , 1999 .

[46]  F. D. Morgan,et al.  Streaming potential properties of westerly granite with applications , 1989 .

[47]  L. Jouniaux,et al.  On the Difficulty of Detecting Streaming Potentials Generated at Depth , 2002 .

[48]  Pride,et al.  Governing equations for the coupled electromagnetics and acoustics of porous media. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[49]  P. Sammonds,et al.  Laboratory studies of electrical potential during rock failure , 2005 .

[50]  M. Nafi Toksöz,et al.  Experimental studies of electrokinetic conversions in fluid‐saturated borehole models , 1999 .

[51]  M. Johnston,et al.  Rapid fluid disruption: A source for self‐potential anomalies on volcanoes , 2001 .

[52]  T. Ishido,et al.  Experimental and theoretical basis of electrokinetic phenomena in rock‐water systems and its applications to geophysics , 1981 .

[53]  A. Watillon,et al.  Potentiel d'écoulement, courant d'écoulement et conductance de surface à l'interface eau-verre , 1970 .

[54]  T. Spies,et al.  Acoustic emission in Rock Mechanics studies , 2000 .

[55]  Bijan Nourbehect,et al.  Irreversible thermodynamic effects in inhomogeneous media and their applications in certain geoelectric problems , 1963 .

[56]  C H Scholz,et al.  Earthquake prediction: a physical basis. , 1973, Science.

[57]  R. Horn,et al.  Contact Electrification and Adhesion Between Dissimilar Materials , 1992, Science.

[58]  Kazuo Oike,et al.  Electromagnetic radiations from rocks , 1985 .

[59]  J. Byerlee,et al.  Magnetic and electric fields associated with changes in high pore pressure in fault zones : Application to the Loma Prieta ULF emissions , 1995 .

[60]  B. T. Brady,et al.  Sources of electromagnetic radiation from fracture of rock samples in the laboratory , 1987 .

[61]  H. Hashimoto,et al.  Emission of charged particles from indentation fracture of rocks , 1990, Nature.

[62]  P. N. Sundaram,et al.  Electrical resistivity changes in rocks during frictional sliding and fracture , 1978 .

[63]  Toshiyuki Tosha,et al.  Zeta potential measured for an intact granite sample at temperatures to 200°C , 2003 .

[64]  J. Berryman.  Poroelastic fluid effects on shear for rocks with soft anisotropy , 2004 .

[65]  David V. Fitterman,et al.  Electrokinetic and magnetic anomalies associated with dilatant regions in a layered Earth , 1978 .

[66]  Liqing Ren,et al.  Interfacial electrokinetic effects on liquid flow in microchannels , 2001 .

[67]  J. Miyakoshi.  Anomalous Time Variation of the Self-Potential in the Fractured Zone of an Active Fault Preceding the Earthquake Occurrence , 1986 .